Essex police interviews of Jeremy Bamber, September 1985...

[mike tesko]

Essex police interviews of Jeremy Bamber, September 1985

Read the questions, and answers, for yourself:-

[mike tesko]

Additional Interview:-

[mike tesko]

Additional interview:-

[mike tesko]

Don't forget that Jeremy was released on bail after all these interviews, and not charged with the murders...

[grahameb]

So Jeremy did NOT leave a loaded gun lying around? He said he "unclipped" the magazine and put it on the side.

[tyler]

He admits in this statement to calling Julie before he called the police.I have always beleived that is what occured. I have read somewhere before that he phoned Julie after the call from his father and said to her "Theres something wrong at the farm,what should I do"? She told him in reply,"do not worry,just go back to bed". He decided to ring the police to be on the safe side.I believe this is what happened,and somehow events have been twisted along the way and that Jeremy has felt he has had to change his version of events to counteract others suspicious theories.He should have just stuck to the truth.

[chochokeira]

Interview records will be updated tomorrow evening - sorry for delay in posting all...

Don't forget that Jeremy was released on bail after all these interviews, and not charged with the murders...

Thanks for posting these, Mike +1

[Jackiepreece]

Unbelievable thats the first I knew about the so called hit man

So Jeremy hadnt seen this guy for months and months and didnt really know him well and we are led to believe Jeremy would out of the blue go off and find this guy and arrange for him to kill all the family

I have never ever heard anything more ridiculous

There must be any number of people who would know that Jeremy had seen the guy nearer the time of the murders

Another fairy story by JM

[mike tesko]

Jeremy provided the police with a means of proving he had received the call in question from his father, and that he had tried to call him back, only to be greeted by a constant engaged tone - and how Jeremy had told the police, how he always used the last number dialled button to always call someone back if engaged, which caused the police to seize Jeremy's answer phone, and audio tapes - the rest is history. Evidence withheld under pii...

[mike tesko]

No official police record exists, as part of file SC/768/85 - to confirm that police seized Jeremy's answer phone, or that they examined its memory, including six audio tapes belonging to it, with a view to proving or confirming that Ralph did call Jeremy, and that Jeremy used the redial button to try to call him back, just like Jeremy had said in one of his police interveiws - all the evidence relating to these matters, was delberately withheld as part of pii, under the original file reference, SC/688/85...

Although they took Jeremy's answer phone and audio tapes to examine them, these items have never been given an official exhibits reference, yet Essex police returned them to Jeremy years after he was convicted - I do not profess to know where these are now, but I do have some documentation to confirm that Essex police had these in their possession about the time of or from his first arrest at the beginning of September 1985...

[shonapugs]

He admits in this statement to calling Julie before he called the police.I have always beleived that is what occured. I have read somewhere before that he phoned Julie after the call from his father and said to her "Theres something wrong at the farm,what should I do"? She told him in reply,"do not worry,just go back to bed". He decided to ring the police to be on the safe side.I believe this is what happened,and somehow events have been twisted along the way and that Jeremy has felt he has had to change his version of events to counteract others suspicious theories.He should have just stuck to the truth.

Hallo, Tyler. Don't forget that Ralph was supposed to have said "come quick, you're sister's gone crazy with a gun." That's a bit more urgent than "something's wrong at the farm."

[tyler]

He admits in this statement to calling Julie before he called the police.I have always beleived that is what occured. I have read somewhere before that he phoned Julie after the call from his father and said to her "Theres something wrong at the farm,what should I do"? She told him in reply,"do not worry,just go back to bed". He decided to ring the police to be on the safe side.I believe this is what happened,and somehow events have been twisted along the way and that Jeremy has felt he has had to change his version of events to counteract others suspicious theories.He should have just stuck to the truth.

Shona,a very good point!
Hallo, Tyler. Don't forget that Ralph was supposed to have said "come quick, you're sister's gone crazy with a gun." That's a bit more urgent than "something's wrong at the farm."

[mike tesko]

Additional interviews by Essex police of Jeremy Bamber in September 1985:-

Please note, that at the end of the interviews, I have posted a copy of DS 21 "Stan" Jones pocketbook cover, which shows that contains all his evidence about his involvement in this case, in pocket book number 49, that started on 5th November 1984 and finished on 7th May 1986 - however, please note that DS Jones, has crossed out the start date, of 5th November 1984, and substituted it with 4th April 1985, which he has also subsequently scribbled out, and replaced that with 5th April 1985, so that the notes in his official pocketbook commenced from 5th April 1985 and concluded on 7th May 1985 - my query is this, what happened top all the original notes contained in this pocketbook, between 5th November 1984 and 4th April 1985?

It is strongly suspected that DS Jones falsified his account in this pocketbook, so as to allow introduction of the silencer being handed to him much earlier by the relatives, than what actually took place, and also to remove any evidence to show that he himself took possession of a silencer from the scene before 9th August 1985 when the keys to whf were handed back to the relatives, and his involvement with Julie Mugford and the relatives in trying to stitch Jeremy up for the murders...

DS Jones is guilty of tampering with his pocketbook entries relating to the relevant periods - if you look closely enough, there is an official ESSEX police stamp, dated, 5th November 1984, onj the front cover, so why do entries contained in it commence on 5th April 1985, some five months later?

Nobody should believe anything DS Jones said or says about this case, because he is a criminal who thinks nothing of falsifying evidence, you only have to look at the evidence on the front cover of his pocketbook (49) and considered the role he played in the finding of the original silencer (SBJ/1) at the scene, and his collusion with Julie Mugford to get her to lie about things to try to get Jeremy convicted of these matters to see and know that he was a disgrace as a police officer...

Why hasn't he been investigated and prosecution for falsifying his pocketbook entries in connection with this investigation?

In my view, he is a SCUMBAG, who should be in prison and the key thrown away...

[shonapugs]

After reading this, all I can say is I hope that none of my children ever give a thought to what they might gain "if my whole family had died."

[shonapugs]

Can it please be noted that my last remark was posted after int 30. A LOT has been edited and added since then.