Author Topic: And 'then' the 'truth in the matter', 'finally became clear'!  (Read 341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
No-one examined, 'the bloodied hand'  / 'fingerprint' stain 'present upon the front lower right hand side', of 'Sheilas  nightdress' to see 'to whom the blood in the stain', belonged to?

This was / is because the replicated prints (thereon) were as a result of 'fingerprint ink' applied by 'DC Henderson' to ' the palm' and 'fingers'  of 'Sheila Caffell'. Matters now have 'taken on a
a new 'journey of destruction' of 'the police' and 'prosecutions case', since, 'it confirms' that 'Sheilas' hands were 'coated in ink' (not blood) and therefore, this 'establishes' and 'proves' that 'DI Cook' and 'PC Bird' told 'deliberate lies' concerning 'whether' or 'not , the matter 'was dealt with adequately enough'?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 02:47:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: And 'then' the 'truth in the matter', 'finally became clear'!
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2022, 12:00:PM »
No-one examined, 'the bloodied hand'  / 'fingerprint' stain 'present upon the front lower right hand side', of 'Sheilas  nightdress' to see 'to whom the blood in the stain', belonged to?

This was / is because the replicated prints (thereon) were as a result of 'fingerprint ink' applied by 'DC Henderson' to ' the palm' and 'fingers'  of 'Sheila Caffell'. Matters now have 'taken on a
a new 'journey of destruction' of 'the police' and 'prosecutions case', since, 'it confirms' that 'Sheilas' hands were 'coated in ink' (not blood) and therefore, this 'establishes' and 'proves' that 'DI Cook' and 'PC Bird' told 'deliberate lies' concerning 'whether' or 'not , the matter 'was dealt with adequately enough'?

The palm and fingerprint stain (if it is ink and not blood) on the front lower right hand side of 'Sheilas nightdress', serves to confirm that 'Sheila' was  ,'fingerprinted at the scene and her body was then staged as a suicide when 'rifle [18]' was [thus] placed onto her body, in an attempt to make the alleged suicide, in her particular circumstances, believable! Everything was running smoothly, untill ' PC Robert Carr' [ a Metropolitan police officer] stuck his nose into the  police  Investigation' when he attended 'Witham police station' on the 11th August 1985, and whilst visiting there he missed  bumping into  'Jeremy '. From then on,  'PC Carr' involved himself in the investigation, and he gave  sensitive information to relatives of the deceased , concerning the number of shots had been inflicted to all five members of the family. Until that time, relatives were under the impression that all victims had been shot once ('a shot' which 'killed them all')..



 
« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 04:38:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: And 'then' the 'truth in the matter', 'finally became clear'!
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2022, 05:48:PM »
'I have  it on good authority', that 'PC Robert Carr' involved himself
 directly 'into the Essex police investigation' from as early as 'the 8th August 1985', when 'he seized a rifle at the crime scene', which had got 'a presence of crushed paint on the end of its barrel'! The rifle in question was 'a [BSA type] .22 pellet gun'. He found 'a scratch mark' on a  'bedside  cabinet', in the 'main bedroom', on 'the same side of the bed' to where 'Sheilas body  was eventually placed'  and 'photographed during a training exercise' referred to as 'Informatives ', and it was 'during this unfolding drama' that 'PC 'Robert Carr' took 'a paint sample'  as a precautionary measure! He handed this paint sample to 'DS Davidson', who gave it the exhibit reference' of 'RC/1', who in turn, handed it to the exhibits officer at the crime scene on that same date! The exhibits officer, made an entry in /on the property record which he was completing  at the scene, on the same date ['8th August 1985']. In point of fact, 'THE rifle with paint particles ingrained into the rifles barrel, came from two different locations, either inside the farmhouse, or otherwise, the 'two paint samples' were 'similar to the light coloured paint' on 'a bedside cabinet', but 'the other coloured paint mark',  which 'was red in colour'!





« Last Edit: August 12, 2022, 05:57:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...