The 'hand Swab evidence' now falls into consideration!
The 'fairy tale claim' that 'DC Hammersley' took 'the fingerprints' of 'Sheila Caffell' at 11.30am [at the scene], and again, at ['Chelmsford mortuary' at around '3.15pm'] on the 'same date' prior to 'autopsy' is 'an invention', since, 'DC Hammersley' was 'not on duty' and 'he did not join the investigation team' at 'the scene', until 'the following day' [8th August 1985] In 'point of fact', 'DC Hammersley' ['for whatever reason'], or 'purpose', he 'took it upon himself' to 'play a substitution role', which 'DC Henderson' had 'performed 'at the scene', on the 'day before' and after 'cleaning' [Sheilas] 'the hands ' in order to take a set of 'blood free handswabs' and 'a fresh set of blood free fingerpints'. There existed ' in point of fact' two versions each, of 'hand swabs' and 'the fingerprints', - (1) a 'set of (a) blood stained' and (b) 'ink contaminated', fingerprints, and (2) - a set of 'uncontaminated handswabs' and ' a set of 'uncontaminated fingerprints', which were passed off as 'only one version of each of the two samples'!!
Any 'fingerprints' taken 'at the scene' by 'DC Hammersley', or 'other wise', would have required 'Sheila Caffells' hands / fingers, to be 'immersed in ink' and 'as such', any 'firearm residue results' [from the 'original fingerprint ink'] and or, 'the handswabs', or 'both' is 'testimony which establishes 'the extent of corruption' in this 'particular reality'!!!
