Two hundred pieces of evidence against Bamber

[lookout]

AE's WS says June bought the bike on the 13th July 1985.

Twenty days before the massacre.

Suspect Bamber stole it around 4th August. Give him enough time to do a trial run. Julie also said she saw it when she was last there. Around 3 days before.

" Suspect ?" Another lie,unless you can prove it. You're full of assumptions !

[Adam]

" Suspect ?" Another lie,unless you can prove it. You're full of assumptions !

The only person that does know is Bamber.

He's always refused to say when he stole June's bike.

He didn't need to steal it until around 4 days before.

[Adam]

We do know June only bought the bike 20 days before the massacre.

Rob saying Bamber stole the bike weeks before was wrong.

[Jane]

Some supporters argue that Bonnet received a call from Nevill,but this is wrong.Nevills call was passed on to Bonnet by West,the log clearly shows this.JBs call however was NEVER passed on to Bonnet.The timings on the two disclosed logs are correct.Bonnet made out his log at 3.26 when west phoned/radiod him,and West made out his log at 3.36 when JB phoned him.The police knew there was a call from Nevill and told this to the relatives,but after some head scratching and seeing the bike at JBs cottage,they set about proving that JB made both calls.

The statements you claim as being factual are sweeping beyond belief, as is your claim to know exactly what happened. I'd say those you're accusing of duplicity made a far better job of proving their case, than do you, of yours.

[lookout]

We do know June only bought the bike 20 days before the massacre.

Rob saying Bamber stole the bike weeks before was wrong.

The bike was bought in the hope that JM would cycle to and fro instead of staying with JB at his Goldhanger house as she, June, didn't believe in co-habiting or anything ungodly.

[snow66!]

The statements you claim as being factual are sweeping beyond belief, as is your claim to know exactly what happened. I'd say those you're accusing of duplicity made a far better job of proving their case, than do you, of yours.

Hiya Jane,nice weather,hope your coping with the heat.Thanks for the reply,although it is a bit harsh. ,at least you have acklowledged my theories,no one else seems very interested,oh except Killingeve who called it fiction.Well you never know,I may just be right Jane,and some day you will be saying wowee,the snowman was right after all.

[Jane]

Hiya Jane,nice weather,hope your coping with the heat.Thanks for the reply,although it is a bit harsh. ,at least you have acklowledged my theories,no one else seems very interested,oh except Killingeve who called it fiction.Well you never know,I may just be right Jane,and some day you will be saying wowee,the snowman was right after all.

Snow, it grieves me to say so, and I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to agree with Killingeve.............but your saving grace may just be that what you say is just tongue in cheek put out for your own amusement? Not that you're likely to let on if it is, eh? 

[Roch]

Some supporters argue that Bonnet received a call from Nevill,but this is wrong.Nevills call was passed on to Bonnet by West,the log clearly shows this.JBs call however was NEVER passed on to Bonnet.The timings on the two disclosed logs are correct.Bonnet made out his log at 3.26 when west phoned/radiod him,and West made out his log at 3.36 when JB phoned him.The police knew there was a call from Nevill and told this to the relatives,but after some head scratching and seeing the bike at JBs cottage,they set about proving that JB made both calls.

If they did anything to prove whether two calls could have been made by the same person from two different locations, then that would suggest that two separate calls were indeed made.

[snow66!]

Snow, it grieves me to say so, and I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to agree with Killingeve.............but your saving grace may just be that what you say is just tongue in cheek put out for your own amusement? Not that you're likely to let on if it is, eh? 

Sorry Jane,it was by no means supposed to be tongue in cheek.I actually thought it explained what possibly happened quite coherently.

[snow66!]

If they did anything to prove whether two calls could have been made by the same person from two different locations, then that would suggest that two separate calls were indeed made.

Hi Roch,that is what I have been asking,what was the importance of timing the routes?If only one call was made that night to the police,and BT didnt record a call from Nev to JB ,the police didn't have to worry if JB drove,biked or walked to and from the Whitehouse.So what exactly were they trying to prove timing the different routes?The only reason I can think of is if evidence of another call existed,either to the police or from Nev to jb.Or am I missing something obvious with all my fiction?

[lookout]

For those who don't believe that Nevill made a call, would it be because of his non-renewed gun licence which had been due prior to the shootings and his reluctance to involve the police at that stage ?

[lookout]

 Two hundred pieces of evidence in defence of Bamber----that EP have retained for nearly 37 years !
From over 600 letters and packs containing information on the case which were sent out to all MP's, ONE had been acknowleged ! David Davis, once Secretary of State was the only MP to reply, with interest, and ONE person in the House of Lords also answered and showed her interest. Everywhere else,it fell on deaf ears as usual.

This is not just JB's case but others too who've been let down by the justice system as 9 out of 10 cases of MOJ's involves the withholding of evidence. Shocking statistics in what is classed as a democratic society.

These are MP's that we the public, put where they are ! Why ? Their sheer ignorance in not affording a reply surely tells us all that their interest in the general public is totally zilch. 

[snow66!]

Two hundred pieces of evidence in defence of Bamber----that EP have retained for nearly 37 years !
From over 600 letters and packs containing information on the case which were sent out to all MP's, ONE had been acknowleged ! David Davis, once Secretary of State was the only MP to reply, with interest, and ONE person in the House of Lords also answered and showed her interest. Everywhere else,it fell on deaf ears as usual.

This is not just JB's case but others too who've been let down by the justice system as 9 out of 10 cases of MOJ's involves the withholding of evidence. Shocking statistics in what is classed as a democratic society.

These are MP's that we the public, put where they are ! Why ? Their sheer ignorance in not affording a reply surely tells us all that their interest in the general public is totally zilch.

Good morning Lookout,are you referring to the letters that Stuart Bower sent to MPs?

[lookout]

Good morning Lookout,are you referring to the letters that Stuart Bower sent to MPs?

No, it wasn't Stuart Bower who sent the letters.

[Cambridgecutie]

" Suspect ?" Another lie,unless you can prove it. You're full of assumptions !

Jeremy Bamber admitted to taking the bike from WHF and keeping it at his house in Goldhanger.

He says he took the bike about a week before the murders happened, without giving a specific date.

He said this during his interviews after becoming a suspect.

He said he took the bike so that Julie could ride it.

So, you make of that what you will.