Two hundred pieces of evidence against Bamber

[Rob_]

Agree he may have attempted an 11 shot massacre. But didn't make it.

I don't go much on this 11 shot thing? but anyway ten shots were plenty if JB had thought about the crime, and with no questions asked about reloads.

[Steve_uk]

If Nevill died first, June inherits everything.

A nightmare scenario for Bamber.

One or both could live another 20 years. Another nightmare for him.

Both nightmares could happen!

But you're forgetting the heartfelt letter written by June to be opened by Sheila and Jeremy after her death.

[Adam]

I don't agree with them Adam. It's misleading to say Jeremy was in a bad position regarding the wills. It would be more accurate to say he was in a better position once he had killed off all the other beneficiaries.

It's not my opinion so nothing to agree/disagree with. It is the situation with the wills. As stated by Bamber.

Do you know what Bamber's & Junes shares in the caravan park were?

[Adam]

Read that when abroad Bamber asked June to send him some more money.

June sent him a plane ticket back to England!

[ILB]

Read that when abroad Bamber asked June to send him some more money.

June sent him a plane ticket back to England!

The most sensible action. My mother would have done the same.

[Rob_]

Read that when abroad Bamber asked June to send him some more money.

June sent him a plane ticket back to England!

I hope that is not one of your 200 hundred pieces of evidence Adam? if it is I now make it 198 pieces 

[Adam]

I hope that is not one of your 200 hundred pieces of evidence Adam? if it is I now make it 198 pieces 

It is not one of my pieces. Although with Sheila, Daniel & Nicholas getting hundreds a week, I'm sure he wasn't pleased.

Still 200. Although probably more.  There is 75 in one document!

[snow66!]

Well now you have made further allegations, namely that Jeremy imitated Nevill on the telephone to police, that Taff Jones changed his stance regarding Jeremy's innocence and therefore covered up a call he knew had been received by one of his junior officers.

Well,remember Taff wasn't in charge by that time Steve.And ask yourself this Steve,why was Bonnets log withheld? Common sense surely tells you that the police would have had a hard time explaining the mistakes and differences in the two logs.

[snow66!]

To the jury.

[snow66!]

When was Bonnets log disclosed?

[Adam]

He was basically tied to the Farm for the duration of his parents' lifetime. It's misleading to say he was in a bad position regarding the wills.

That already puts him in a bad positon.

[lookout]

This is sounding more and more like a work of fiction as Adam goes along, it's shocking !


How about reversing the procedures by discussing what would have happened "IF" JB had indeed committed the murders and done nothing ?
How would that have been solved seeing as there'd been no forensic evidence found  ? Would he have been tried for murder then ?

 

[snow66!]

When was Bonnets log disclosed?

Some supporters argue that Bonnet received a call from Nevill,but this is wrong.Nevills call was passed on to Bonnet by West,the log clearly shows this.JBs call however was NEVER passed on to Bonnet.The timings on the two disclosed logs are correct.Bonnet made out his log at 3.26 when west phoned/radiod him,and West made out his log at 3.36 when JB phoned him.The police knew there was a call from Nevill and told this to the relatives,but after some head scratching and seeing the bike at JBs cottage,they set about proving that JB made both calls.

[snow66!]

It all spiralled from there with JBs odd behaviourBut there was no proof whatsoever against JB at this stage,on the contrary the call from Nevill was on his side.Funny how new evidence suddenly appeared in the nick of time,ie,silencer and scratches after the crime scene was vacated.

[Steve_uk]

Not to mention June adding the church, friends, relatives & the twins to her will.

In Chapter 15 footnote 22 of her book Carol Ann Lee states Jeremy had looked at the wills, fearing that June had left money to the Church, though in fact, she hadn't (Julie's W/S 8/9 September 1985). I've trawled through all statements by Julie on this site but have been unable to find the direct quote.