QC's Bamber timeline.

[Adam]

ILB confirmed to QC 'no alibi = window of opportunity'.

QC won't like that. But he obviously has a timeline & says he believes Bamber would have started earlier than in my timeline - 1.45am.

ILB agreed with my timeline.

Look forward to reading QC's.

[Adam]

QC submitted a Bamber scenario. Eventually.

So must have a timeline.

Just needs to be something basic like my one is.

Bullet points, not waffle.

[Adam]

1.45am:

Leave Cottage.


2.00am:

Enter WHF.
Committ massacre.


2.40am:

Start staging scene.


3.10am:

Ring AM (not confirmed)
Exit WHF.


3.25 - 3.40am:

Arrive home.
Ring police.
Ring Julie.
Wash.
Change.

--------

[Adam]

My timeline is above.

QC refused to accept it, saying it would take Bamber over 25 minutes to cycle back to his cottage.

This has been proved wrong. Wilkinson saying 3 cycle journeys took 6, 10 & 12 minutes.

He has since said my timeline is wrong but has refused to say why. Just saying Bamber would start earlier but then refusing to elaborate.

Despite being a guilter, he has not submitted his own timeline. Hopefully he will do so on this thread when he is next online.

As with his scenarios, better late than never.

[Adam]

It seems that QC is not going to provide a Bamber timeline. Which is disappointing.

He was the first to claim mine was wrong & it would take Bamber at least 25 minutes to cycle home. This has been dismissed.

He continued to say it was wrong although not give any reasons. Except Bamber would start sooner. Of which he did not elaborate.

ILB thinks my timeline is fine. Guess he's right.

[guest29835]

It seems that QC is not going to provide a Bamber timeline. Which is disappointing.

He was the first to claim mine was wrong & it would take Bamber at least 25 minutes to cycle home. This has been dismissed.

He continued to say it was wrong although not give any reasons. Except Bamber would start sooner. Of which he did not elaborate.

ILB thinks my timeline is fine. Guess he's right.

If ILB thinks your timeline is fine, then he must have been smoking the same stuff as you.

[Adam]

If ILB thinks your timeline is fine, then he must have been smoking the same stuff as you.

We actually agree on how long it would take Bamber inside WHF. Me, 70 minutes, you 75 minutes.

After reading Wilkinson's detailed WS, we obviously both agree it would take Bamber around 10 minutes to cycle back.

[guest29835]

We actually agree on how long it would take Bamber inside WHF. Me, 70 minutes, you 75 minutes.

After reading Wilkinson's detailed WS, we obviously both agree it would take Bamber around 10 minutes to cycle back.

I'm sure there's lots we agree about, but our conclusions differ.