Blood Expert 'John Hayward' gave 'evidence at the trial' of 'Jeremy Bamber' which commenced at Chelmsford Crown Court from the 2nd October 1986, during which time he set out what was so significant about his evidence as part of the prosecution's case. He was then cross examined by defence counsel, who questioned him on particular points he had given his conclusions regarding whether or not, the obtained blood group test results associated to a silencer that (he stated) was 'exclusive to Sheila! Which led him to admit, that there was, 'however', a very remote possibility that the resultant blood group evidence, could have involved 'an intimate mixture of Sheila' and 'June Bambers' blood types, but he added that He very much doubted this possibility, as he would have expected 'June Bambers' AK2-1 blood (type), to disguise (or mask) any chance of, Junes 'AK-2-1, enzyme from being absent from the result, by virtue of the fact that the 'Ak2-1' enzyme attributable to 'June', was'/ 'is', much more 'virile', and it would more than likely 'mask' and 'nullify any existence for the presence of 'AK/1', 'associated' with / to 'Sheila'..
The trial judge [justice Drake] 'reminded the jury in his summing up speech, of 'John Haywards' (blood expert), 'testimony', left jurors in no doubt that the prosecution's stance, rather than the defence claim that the b
