Scott Forbes interview

[Fairplay1]

Has anybody seen this interview , all I will say is he holds nothing back , he names the murderer . He says he does not care anymore it's time everything came out and he has done his own book exposing all.  He was involved in Luke's appeals .

The interview can be found on YouTube TS80 Scott Forbes A Long walk to Justice .

Their will be backlash I expect but the guy does not care anymore his agenda is to expose those who covered up and allowed a 14 year old boy to take the fall and get Luke free

[Davie2]

Over 2 hours listening to a blagger accuse innocent people of murder, i could think of better things to be doing with my time. I wonder if he is still abusing female politicians on twitter? Anyway, let me take a wild guess at what he rants about. Will make vast claims about being a lawyer? Rants & raves about MK? Rants & raves about JJ? Probably just about sums it up. Luke was set-up blah blah. It will keep the cult guessing, i suppose, a new book to sell. The fact of the matter is, unless transcripts of interviews etc are made available, then it is utterly pointless, these charlatans have been saying the same nonsense over & over for years. Milking every last penny possible out of it.

I may one day listen to his BS, and pick apart every contradiction he makes. Blagging a story is easy, proving you are right is the hard part, show the people the documents and prove you are right. Na thought so.....

[Fairplay1]

Over 2 hours listening to a blagger accuse innocent people of murder, i could think of better things to be doing with my time. I wonder if he is still abusing female politicians on twitter? Anyway, let me take a wild guess at what he rants about. Will make vast claims about being a lawyer? Rants & raves about MK? Rants & raves about JJ? Probably just about sums it up. Luke was set-up blah blah. It will keep the cult guessing, i suppose, a new book to sell. The fact of the matter is, unless transcripts of interviews etc are made available, then it is utterly pointless, these charlatans have been saying the same nonsense over & over for years. Milking every last penny possible out of it.

I may one day listen to his BS, and pick apart every contradiction he makes. Blagging a story is easy, proving you are right is the hard part, show the people the documents and prove you are right. Na thought so.....

Well the only thing I will say is he is naming and giving the violent background and medical background of the person who lived with Jodi , who did not give evidence or testimony , who was violent to family members on the weeks running up to the murder, who cancelled their mental health appointment on the day Jodi was murdered .  I will be expecting him to take Scott Forbes to court if he is lying or maybe we will only be met by a dignified silence ,  we will have to wait and see

Scott Forbes has worked on his case and been involved with appeals , I know the usual reaction is to character assignate anybody that speaks up for Mr Mitchell Dave but he is taking a huge gamble if he is making it up he will be sued , right .
 Do you think the person he has named which is also known as stocky man who was witnessed by 2 independent witnesses following Jodi on the night of the murder , do u think he will take him to court for outing him as the murderer. I don't actually know the legal implications of naming a person but I will be expecting him to be sued if it's all lies, but that's just my views.

He also speaks a lot about politics in second half , he is very outspoken I will say that

[Davie2]

but he is taking a huge gamble if he is making it up he will be sued

Not really. It's the same old, do you think what he is saying is new? It has all been done to death, whether they say it with their real names or behind screen handles. He is just preaching to the already converted.

We are absolutely past the point of any nonsense they come out with, the only thing that they can come out with, these days, is to release the Mitchell statements. They don't care about consequences, right?

And anyway, was there not a new legal team in place? That wanted everything kept quiet until, they went through things? But yet SF is flapping his gums on YouTube podcasts? Writing books? Can maybe pull the wool over some people's eyes, i find it mind-boggling how easily people can be manipulated, without any evidence presented to them.

[Fairplay1]

With all due respect I find it mind boggling how people can continue to support a complete shambles ( not my words, the liaison officer who gave evidence) of an investigation.

 I find it mind boggling that people can support a fully circumstancial case with no direct forensic evidence of any kind linking Luke Mitchell to the crime.

 I find it mind boggling that 2 boys known to Jodi who dealt drugs to Luke and Jodi were at the very spot at the very time of the murder , I will tell you who has never been identified at the very spot at the very time Luke Mitchell , yeah mind boggling for sure .

 One huge area that my mind boggles out of control that after untold credible experts who support a miscarriage ( sorry prof neither you or mr Parky are expert) , how after all these people with background that can be checked and verified for credibility that support a further assessment of this case as it is filled with problems why people like you just ignore , mind boggling I agree Peace out Professor D
[/quote]

[Davie2]

With all due respect I find it mind boggling how people can continue to support a complete shambles ( not my words, the liaison officer who gave evidence) of an investigation.

 I find it mind boggling that people can support a fully circumstancial case with no direct forensic evidence of any kind linking Luke Mitchell to the crime.

 I find it mind boggling that 2 boys known to Jodi who dealt drugs to Luke and Jodi were at the very spot at the very time of the murder , I will tell you who has never been identified at the very spot at the very time Luke Mitchell , yeah mind boggling for sure .

 One huge area that my mind boggles out of control that after untold credible experts who support a miscarriage ( sorry prof neither you or mr Parky are expert) , how after all these people with background that can be checked and verified for credibility that support a further assessment of this case as it is filled with problems why people like you just ignore , mind boggling I agree Peace out Professor D

Hope you never pre-ordered the new book lol.

[Davie2]

Hope you never pre-ordered the new book lol.

Hook line and sinker...