Is there all that much in this [`Yes'there is] . If Sheila was the last person to be shot[`by whom'] it's very possible that traces of blood from the other victims could've easily be deposited on her nightdress. [`including for the possibility, that 'Sheila' had shot herself, or that she was shot by police on one, or two different occasions']
Regarding the attack on Nevill and June [`which could have been at the hand of 'Sheila' intertwined with the strong possibility, that at some stage, 'Neville' and 'June' attacked eachother, or indeed, that during a police exercise, the police trainees fired live rounds into the bodies of victims who they believed to be dead.][It remains distinctly possible, that 'whilst' carrying out 'the practice of informatives', that when police were reconstructing the position of 'Sheila Caffells' body, that 'the rifle in question discharged a shot' which actually did kill her'! once JB exited the room ['if, he was there'] June could've staggered over to Neville [`and whilst the parents were struggling with one another'] he in turn goes after JB or, of course the following could be true. For example, 'Neville Bamber' managed to get himself downstairs and make a desperate but short telephone call to 'Jeremy' which 'he' terminated the duration of, because, 'Neville' needed to call the police (3.26am) to alert them what had, and was taking place inside the somewhat isolated location of the farmhouse, from where 'Neville' was contacting them from the farmhouse telephone line'.. . Whatever way it happened there is a very distinct possibility of cross contamination of Neville, June and Sheila's blood.[`Yeah', a fair point] I think it would be very surprising if there was no cross contamination of the blood of the victims given the circumstances.[`including, the strong possibility that any cross contaminaction of all their blood types, at the time 'Sheila shot the others'] We simple don't know for sure the order of the murders. So a lot of claims regarding blood groups can't be proved beyond reasonable doubt. 'that' was 'a matter which the jury needed to hear about', and which 'the evidence of such' was' not disclosed' to 'the defense counsel' or 'to the court which tried the matter'...
Also very possible that Sheila was awakened by the commotion 'There was' and is 'no evidence', whatsoever, that 'Sheila' slept 'at all' during 'the evening and the night of 6th/7th August 1985' and could've easily gone into Junes room and would've obviously tried to help June.[`or, as 'the case may be', when 'Sheila' went into the main bedroom intent on shooting 'June' dead..] Again possible contamination.[`or', 'inevitable cross contamination']Shock and horror would've played a massive part in all of this[`which was surely the role' and 'responsibity of the jury', to make 'any judgement upon', but 'they were never given such an opportunity to pass judgement upon' relating 'to this issue'. So both could've been paralysed with fear. 'I guess', the 'same paralysis' and 'fear', on the part of the prosecution', its 'experts', 'police', and 'some members of the public'. If the true circumstances of the multiple contamination of 'Sheila Caffells' nightdress had been disclosed to the defense, the court, and the jury, the verdict would have been totally different!!!
[`Instead, everybody was being told that there was no other persons blood group types on the nightdress [which was not, and is not true!]
JB then returns after the fight with Neville.[`there exists no evidence capable of supporting this narrative! I mean as previously stated I'm not a student of this case but regarding this thread I can't see anything conclusive.['wait and see']
