Sensational 'twist in blood type results' that were found on nightdress [`ND/3']

[Rob_]

Get your act together Rob.

Long quotes won't help you.

How would the nightdress benefit Bamber now. It was tested & available for testing until 1996.

Adam stop letting the village idiot doing your posts 

I will give you a clue:

"In October 2008" and "derived using the latest forensic DNA analysis"

[Adam]

Adam stop letting the village idiot doing your posts 

I will give you a clue:

"In October 2008" and "derived using the latest forensic DNA analysis"

What's 2008 got to do with a box of frogs? The nightdress was disposed of in 1996.

What new evidence could be found on the nightdress?

[Rob_]

What's 2008 got to do with a box of frogs? The nightdress was disposed of in 1996.

What new evidence could be found on the nightdress?

I can't give you any more clues other than the case was solved using the latest technology in 2008.

I can dig lots more examples out Adam but I am sure you will want to do your own research.

[Adam]

I can't give you any more clues other than the case was solved using the latest technology in 2008.

I can dig lots more examples out Adam but I am sure you will want to do your own research.

I know technology is always improving.

What would today's technology discover on the nightdress that could benefit Bamber?

[Rob_]

I know technology is always improving.

What would today's technology discover on the nightdress that would benefit Bamber?

We have discussed this several times before Adam, what was the police so scared of that they destroyed it?

The answer is above!

[Adam]

Besides which my reply to Snow66!'s post was just saying there was nothing sinister in the 1996 disposal.

[Adam]

We have discussed this several times before Adam, what was the police so scared of that they destroyed it?

The answer is above!

The nightdress was tested for -

Damage
Blood.
Oil.
GSR.

----------

Today's technology it can be tested for DNA. But Bamber can just say he's always inside WHF.

[Adam]

Testing for DNA would not really benefit Bamber.

If his DNA is not on the nightdress, it can be said he wore gloves. Or just touched Sheila's skin.

If his DNA is on the nightdress, he has to make excuses.

[mike tesko]

'Sheilas bedroom'

[mike tesko]

Main Bedroom telephone on Sheila Caffells' bed?

[snow66!]

Besides which my reply to Snow66!'s post was just saying there was nothing sinister in the 1996 disposal.

Hi Adam.Dont you think the cops destroyed the night dress because they knew JB wanted to have it DNA tested.Wasnt it because they MAY have known that the other victims blood spray would have been discovered? I dont think the cops were ever that certain of JBs guilt,and who knows,maybe THEY had the dress DNA tested before they destroyed it.Wouldnt they also want to know whose blood was on it? Maybe they found out but it was too late.If they had framed JB thinking he was guilty,it was too late to reverse things without a lot of heads having to roll.Of course some think the cops knew they framed an innocent man in the first place.I just dont know at the moment where the truth lies.

[Adam]

Hi Adam.Dont you think the cops destroyed the night dress because they knew JB wanted to have it DNA tested.Wasnt it because they MAY have known that the other victims blood spray would have been discovered? I dont think the cops were ever that certain of JBs guilt,and who knows,maybe THEY had the dress DNA tested before they destroyed it.Wouldnt they also want to know whose blood was on it? Maybe they found out but it was too late.If they had framed JB thinking he was guilty,it was too late to reverse things without a lot of heads having to roll.Of course some think the cops knew they framed an innocent man in the first place.I just dont know at the moment where the truth lies.

No. But conspiracy theorists will.

How do you know Bamber wanted it DNA tested?  DNA was barely known about in 1996.

The nightdress had already had it's blood tested. All the blood on it was Sheila's.

[Jane]

Adam stop letting the village idiot doing your posts 

I will give you a clue:

"In October 2008" and "derived using the latest forensic DNA analysis"

I can't believe what you've just said, although I appreciate they're not your words. IF this case had truly -TRULY-, been solved in 2008, using the latest and presumably irrefutable technology, which could have been placed, and publicly revealed to having been so, in the hands of the highest authorities in the country, why is JB still behind bars?

This information takes me back to within weeks of joining, as a supporter I'll stress!! to be told that "evidence exists" to see JB walk free!! Not only that, the poster had not only seen it, they HAD it. For weeks, apart from that I was getting bored with being told it, I saw no point in it. Such information should have been placed with the authorities. When I suggested such, to the poster, I was told it would happen when they saw fit!! Made me glad my friends aren't like that!!! Now I take any such claims with a large helping of salt and put them down to wishful thinking.

[mike tesko]

No. But conspiracy theorists will.

How do you know Bamber wanted it DNA tested?  DNA was barely known about in 1996.

The nightdress had already had it's blood tested. All the blood on it was Sheila's.

'For the benefit of everyone', Here are the facts relating to the forensic examination of 'Sheila Caffells' light blue coloured 'nightdress' [exhibit reference 'ND/3', Lab' item no.19], where 'two stains of blood that was present upon her nightdress' produced two conflicting blood group type results. 'Stain 1', and 'Stain 2', produced the following blood group type results:-

301 - blood group type 'A'
2*02 - blood group type 'A'

JF192 - 003 - blood group type '0'
    BB9 - 003 - blood group type 'O'
 BB12 - 2*03 - blood group type 'A'
 BB16 - 2*03 - blood group type 'A'
   BB20 - 003 - blood group type 'O'
 BB21 - 002* - blood group type 'O'
  BB25 -  003 - blood group type 'O'

According to 'forensic scientists' who tested a sample of 'Sheila Caffells' blood, the result they got, was that her blood type 'A1'....

Yet, elsewhere, and documented on  a Lab' record, it states that 'Sheila Caffells' blood type was 'A'..

So, what blood group type was 'Sheila' - blood type 'A1' or blood type 'A'? 

[mike tesko]

'For the benefit of everyone', Here are the facts relating to the forensic examination of 'Sheila Caffells' light blue coloured 'nightdress' [exhibit reference 'ND/3', Lab' item no.19], where 'two stains of blood that was present upon her nightdress' produced two conflicting blood group type results. 'Stain 1', and 'Stain 2', produced the following blood group type results:-

301 - blood group type 'A'
2*02 - blood group type 'A'

JF192 - 003 - blood group type '0'
    BB9 - 003 - blood group type 'O'
 BB12 - 2*03 - blood group type 'A'
 BB16 - 2*03 - blood group type 'A'
   BB20 - 003 - blood group type 'O'
 BB21 - 002* - blood group type 'O'
  BB25 -  003 - blood group type 'O'

According to 'forensic scientists' who tested a sample of 'Sheila Caffells' blood, the result they got, was that her blood type 'A1'....

Yet, elsewhere, and documented on  a Lab' record, it states that 'Sheila Caffells' blood type was 'A'..

So, what blood group type was 'Sheila' - blood type 'A1' or blood type 'A'? 

Wasn't Colin Pitchfork convicted in 1988 through the use of DNA evidence? The nightdress was destroyed in 1996.

Examination of the nightdress seeking blood group type evidence, relating to bloodstains upon it, and the acquired blood group type results was not made available to the defense  at trial [1986], and or, the appeal in 2002. This evidence was withheld from those representing 'Jeremy Bamber' under the opt out rules of, 'Non- Disclosure'...