Sensational 'twist in blood type results' that were found on nightdress [`ND/3']

[mike tesko]

A total of 'five different blood (sample) types' were present upon 'the nightdress [`ND/3'] worn by 'Sheila Caffell, at the time of the shootings!

[mike tesko]

'A' and 'O' blood types were found to be present [when scientifically examined at the laboratory] on the front and back of 'Sheila Caffells', 'light blue nightdress' [`ND/3'] lab' item no.19

[mike tesko]

It therefore remains a very distinctive possibility that 'Sheila Caffells' nightdress [`ND/3'] `LAB ITEM NO. 19' got contaminated with spots and smudges of her victims blood ('A' and 'O') during her attacks upon them!

[lookout]

What can't speak can't lie can it ? Interesting.
It's a foregone conclusion that just the 3 adults present were involved that night and not a 4th, i.e. JB. I've never seen it any other way.

[Rob_]

It's no surprise then that the nightdress was destroyed!

[lookout]

Shocking isn't it Rob ?

[Rob_]

Shocking isn't it Rob ?

Yes terrible Lookout, that dress today would probably solve the case beyond doubt.

[lookout]

Yes terrible Lookout, that dress today would probably solve the case beyond doubt.

Yes, that and quite a few other things too. The deception is unforgiveable. Phone-calls " rolled into one ", 2 silencers " rolled into one "----and so it went on.

[Steve_uk]

Sorry but I don't believe any of this.

[lookout]

Why not Steve ?

[Steve_uk]

Why not Steve ?

It's not included in any of the books on the case for a start. It's never been disclosed on this forum for the ten years I've been here. It's never been raised by any of Jeremy Bamber's legal team hitherto.

[snow66!]

It's not included in any of the books on the case for a start. It's never been disclosed on this forum for the ten years I've been here. It's never been raised by any of Jeremy Bamber's legal team hitherto.

Hi Steve.But what about the nightdress being destroyed just as DNA testing was being widely used.Dosent this make you the slightest bit suspicious?

[lookout]

It's not included in any of the books on the case for a start. It's never been disclosed on this forum for the ten years I've been here.

It's never been raised by any of Jeremy Bamber's legal team hitherto.

Of course it wouldn't be in any of the books as they're mainly anti-Bamber.
I doubt that the team know the half of it as they've only gone so far back in the case.

[Steve_uk]

Hi Steve.But what about the nightdress being destroyed just as DNA testing was being widely used.Dosent this make you the slightest bit suspicious?

Wasn't Colin Pitchfork convicted in 1988 through the use of DNA evidence? The nightdress was destroyed in 1996.

[snow66!]

Wasn't Colin Pitchfork convicted in 1988 through the use of DNA evidence? The nightdress was destroyed in 1996.

Well i suppose that is true Steve.I know the nightdress was examined by forensics in 1985 but probably not DNA tested.Maybe JB only thought to have it DNA tested around 1996 and when the police got wind of this,decided to destroy it.I dont know.Mike will have more idea of the circumstances surrounding the nightdress.