Sheilas Two Shots

[killingeve]

NaughtyNun didn't receive a lifetime ban.  She received a week long ban and returned here 7 years later.

My mistake, it was actually 8 years later.

[Adam]

NaughtyNun didn't receive a lifetime ban.  She received a week long ban and returned here 7 years later.

Yes, NGB did previously say you were able to post. Before you did start posting. 

David is upset that you started posting as a guilter.

Even QC will agree he deserved a permanant ban. Not only was he abusive to other posters, but also to a moderator. More than once.

QC being QC believes permanant equals a few days for him.

Roch said he will clarify when he gets the chance. Hopefully this will be soon to stop confusion on the forum.

[killingeve]

My mistake, it was actually 8 years later.

If I remember/understand correctly NaughtyNun's temp ban was in respect of teasing a bunch of posters about belonging to a knitting circle.  And yet it seems QC was able to make such a comment with apparent impunity:

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10998.msg509557.html#msg509557

Anyway its a beautiful day and the garden is beckoning.

[David1819]

NaughtyNun didn't receive a lifetime ban.  She received a week long ban and returned here 7 years later.

Yes you did receive a lifetime ban. You have made posts on red admitting this.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10913.msg504934.html#msg504934

Your naughtynun account is still banned/locked. 

[snow66!]

Well,i think you need a bit of flamboyance on the forum.And you definitely get that with QC. And Naughty Nuns signiture alone brings a smile to the face [whoever she may or not be]These are people with strong character,and that will no doubt get them into hot water now and again.But they are also very intelligent,and i am sure will not go too far ever again.Dont you think the forum needs certain charachters to liven it up? No doubt there is a thin line between downright abuse and interesting amusing discussion.And remember,let he that is without sin cast the first stone.Ok i know what your going to say,there are forum rules,but to be honest i have not read them myself.

[Adam]

Yes you did receive a lifetime ban. You have made posts on red admitting this.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10913.msg504934.html#msg504934

Your naughtynun account is still banned/locked. 

Quoting JackieD 

[Adam]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10374.msg484682.html#msg484682

[David1819]

Quoting JackieD 

Quoting CambridgeCutie

"I was banned from there, initially for a week for making inoffensive childish comments, despite being told by most that I made a positive contribution.  I was then expected to take the punishment and sit on the naughty step for a week.  Instead I chose to air my grievances on this forum and was then banned for life from the other forum for doing so."

https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3739.msg141212#msg141212

[Adam]

Quoting CambridgeCutie

"I was banned from there, initially for a week for making inoffensive childish comments, despite being told by most that I made a positive contribution.  I was then expected to take the punishment and sit on the naughty step for a week.  Instead I chose to air my grievances on this forum and was then banned for life from the other forum for doing so."

https://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3739.msg141212#msg141212

I stand corrected.

Seems to be confusion. But it was an 8 year gap before she came on here as Cambridgeshirecutie.

QC came back a few days later! As did Scipio, whose permanant ban was quickly reinstated.

Hopefully we will get some clarity on whether permanantly banned posters can return days or years later. 

[David1819]

I stand corrected.

Seems to be confusion. But it was an 8 year gap before she came on here as Cambridgeshirecutie.

QC came back a few days later! As did Scipio, whose permanant ban was quickly reinstated.

Hopefully we will get some clarity on whether permanantly banned posters can return days or years later.

The fact Cambridge came here under a false pretence and wasting everyone's time and making hundreds of posts asking questions she already knew the answers to should itself warrant a ban. She has also been dishonest in post 329 denying ever having a lifetime ban.

She has now gone to the beer garden to get wasted.

[Roch]

Hopefully we will get some clarity on whether permanantly banned posters can return days or years later.

I have already tried to explain this. Also regarding your point about CC - CC was not obligated to wait that length of time in order to return. If you look at the intervening time between then and now, there have probably been any number of bans, none of which will have played out exactly the same.

[Adam]

The fact Cambridge came here under a false pretence and wasting everyone's time and making hundreds of posts asking questions she already knew the answers to should itself warrant a ban. She has also been dishonest in post 329 denying ever having a lifetime ban.

She has now gone to the beer garden to get wasted.

You should have been banned. After ignoring a moderator instruction several times. Sent percifically to you. To not put up offensive pictures.

Anyway, onto Sheila being sedated.

[David1819]

You should have been banned. After ignoring a moderator instruction several times. Sent percifically to you. To not put up offensive pictures.

Anyway, onto Sheila being sedated.

You are in no position to judge who should or shouldn't be banned.

[Adam]

Going by the forensic & circumstantial evidence, it has to be said that Sheila was easy to control.

Forensic: -

She was on Haloperidol.

There is no evidence Sheila put up any resistance.

It was late at night/early morning. Sheila would be drowsy.

Bamber was much stronger.


Circumstantial:-

Pamela Boutflours WS.

Bamber saw Sheila earlier while working.

Bamber saw Sheila at WHF during his reconnaisance.

Bamber was so excited at Sheila's condition, he rang Julie as soon as he got home.

The massacre was carried out, around 3 hours later.

[snow66!]

And talking of Cambridge Cuties past on the forum,i believe that she should never have been banned.After all she was a Nun at the time and was living in a Convent.As such,it should have been the Mother superior who took responsibility for her inaproppriate postsBut no poor Cutie,even after taking her monastic vows was cast out of the Nunnery.She now lives a life of sin,drinking expensive bottles of beer every night,along with other vices,for which she will surely go to hell,poor child.Ithink this will be punishment enough without bringing up her past from time to time,dont you?