why send a text.

[nugnug]

when joi wa late home why di jois mum tet luke instea of phoning him.

[Bubo bubo]

when joi wa late home why di jois mum tet luke instea of phoning him.

She could send the text to more people from her contacts. Quicker than phoning them all.

[nugnug]

She could send the text to more people from her contacts. Quicker than phoning them all.

but he ident tet anybody ele only him.

how did she woul she know he would see the text

the phone might of been switched off he miht of put it own an not have it on him

[Germane]

Because when she sent the text it wasn’t yet, in her mind, an urgent situation Besides, she probably thought LM would not answer it if she called, covering for Jodi. When L phoned Judith to tell her he hadn’t seen jodi, judith immediately became frantic with worry and began calling jodi’s friends to ask if she was there. And then she phoned the police within a few minutes to report Jodi missing.

[nugnug]

Because when she sent the text it wasn’t yet, in her mind, an urgent situation Besides, she probably thought LM would not answer it if she called, covering for Jodi. When L phoned Judith to tell her he hadn’t seen jodi, judith immediately became frantic with worry and began calling jodi’s friends to ask if she was there. And then she phoned the police within a few minutes to report Jodi missing.

she coul of phone the lanline an his mum woudl of answered

[Germane]

I think you are clutching at straws, nugnug. The circumstantial evidence against LM was overwhelming and this is why he was convicted in 2005 and all of his subsequent appeals have failed. The original investigation may not have been perfect, but nor was it a complete debacle. The initial crime scene management could have been better so as to preserve crucial DNA (I actually think the weather conditions worked in LM’s favour and incriminating dna evidence was lost that would have further bolstered the prosecution’s case).

[Germane]

but he ident tet anybody ele only him.

She only sent LM that text message because Jodi had told her earlier at 1650 that she was going to specifically meet Luke and that they would be ‘mucking about up there’ (implying at Easthouses). Jodi had no idea when she arrived home from school that day at 1600 that she would be allowed out before her curfew time of 1800. Judith had grounded Jodi the previous month for skipping school and smoking marijuana, but this had gradually petered out (for example, Jodi was at Luke’s til 2200 on Saturday 28.06.03). Even so, Luke was still allowed to visit Jodi at her house even when she was grounded the previous month. Anyway, as Jodi’s phone was broke she asked for judith’s so she could text him the good news that she was free to come out at 1634 and not after her curfew time of 1800 (the text exchanges between L & J at 1634-1638 were never retrieved). I think we can assume that this young couple arranged to meet at 1700 at the easthouses end of rdp, as they were spotted by AB at the path at 1655, lm had phoned the speaking clock at 1654, and plus SM all but said L wasn’t in the house when he got home at 1640/1650 and wasn’t there when he was on the internet between 1655 -1716.

As I said, Judith had no reason to send that text message to anyone else. She had thought all that evening, from 1650 (when her daughter left the house) through to 2238 (the time she texted LM to tell her daughter to quickly get home) that her daughter was with LM — the boyfriend whom her daughter was seeing on a nightly basis since March ‘03 and whom her daughter considered her first real boyfriend and who she loved. Nothing suspicious about it at all; it was the logical thing to do. Everything the Jones family did that evening was normal and provable. I’m not too sure the same can be said of the Mitchells

[nugnug]

the text was also adressed to jodi why would she send text to luke adressed toj jodi.

[Fairplay1]

I think you are clutching at straws, nugnug. The circumstantial evidence against LM was overwhelming and this is why he was convicted in 2005 and all of his subsequent appeals have failed. The original investigation may not have been perfect, but nor was it a complete debacle. The initial crime scene management could have been better so as to preserve crucial DNA (I actually think the weather conditions worked in LM’s favour and incriminating dna evidence was lost that would have further bolstered the prosecution’s case).

The circumstantial case was over whelming if it was overwhelming every person on the jury would have agreed with the conviction , as we know it was NOT .  Please your faith in a justice system is in my opinion misguided , just do some research on moj in the past and how many times innocent people have to go through appeals and be turned down to eventually get their case overturned. In what way do you feel the case was over whelming.  Was it overwhelming to you to have not a single piece of forensic evidence to either implicate Luke either committing a murder or of clean up after a murder.  Was it overwhelming to you when the STAR WITNESS clearly stated the boy in court was not the man she seen. Maybe you feel overwhelmed by the undisputable evidence used to prove Luke was in the very spot where Jodi was murdered but that can't be right as their was only two people at the spot at the time and that was not Luke Mitchell- was that the bit that makes you feel overwhelmed.  Are you overwhelmed by the police investigation being completed to such a great degree that it leaves you in no doubt. The reason for doubt in this case all these years later is because of that investigation it was OVERWHELMINGLY POOR. What is overwhelmingly clear is this investigation was to a standard that not one credible exper, criminologist , documentary maker has ever touched it and their is reason for that. But I do want to understand why you feel overwhelmed by the evidence used if it's just cherry picking evidence from tabloids that have been proved via appeal docs to have no basis in the trial is devilworshipping , satanism then please don't reply as we are worlds apart in our logical thinking. Please outline for me the indisputable evidence that has you so overwhelmed as I have to understand your level of logic . In my humble opinion with the passage of time and discovery of further areas eg Stocky man, moped boys, unbelievably poor crime scene management and preservation leaves me in no doubt that the case against Luke Mitchell was overwhelmingly poor and unfair, and we owe it to Jodi to bring clarity to the forensic evidence, the undisputable evidence the type that can't be argued with.  Are you aware that their is profiles as yet to be identified found on Jodi body and clothes , why are you not bothered about this type of evidence. Why would Jodi own family not be outraged by this failure to identify who was the last person to leave their body fluid prints on a murder victim , we know it was not Luke so why do you not feel that the forensic analysis in this case undeniable points to OVERWHELMING DOUBT ??

[nugnug]

i belie that tet was sent in te hope he wouldent see it.