Crispy Theory

[lookout]

Thank you.  So Lookout is providing misleading info yet again!

Nope.

[Munksa]

So the male figure is nothing to do with the 'trick of the light/movement' at the window?

Correct!

This is directly from CT website

"Myall reported seeing an 'unidentified male' at this time which ties in with the figure moving in the master bedroom. "

As Roch said Myall saw an unidentified male, different time/place so what CT is saying is this TIES IN with the FIGURE moving. Even CT is saying figure moving NOT a male figure!

They have just morphed two different things into one! But Jeremy's claim that he saw a SILHOUETTE actually WALKING Infront of the window is a new one!

[guest29835]

The Unidentified Male claim is unrelated to the Movement in the Window controversy.

On looking at the trial documents again today, I see that Geoffrey Rivlin, Q.C. did not question PC Myall about the movement in the window, even though it was Myall who actually saw it, not Bews.  I just find that astonishing.  What was the point of asking Bews if he had seen a 'trick of the light'?  Bews saw nothing anyway.

[killingeve]

The Unidentified Male claim is unrelated to the Movement in the Window controversy.

On looking at the trial documents again today, I see that Geoffrey Rivlin, Q.C. did not question PC Myall about the movement in the window, even though it was Myall who actually saw it, not Bews.  I just find that astonishing.  What was the point of asking Bews if he had seen a 'trick of the light'?  Bews saw nothing anyway.

Yeah would have totally altered the outcome of the trial and certainly put the silencer and Julie's testimony into perspective. 

[guest29835]

Yeah would have totally altered the outcome of the trial and certainly put the silencer and Julie's testimony into perspective.

Why couldn't it have altered the outcome of the trial?