Thankyou Grahame, I do appreciate you have some malicious and difficult visitors. I don't quite understand what I did to generate quite such hostility. From what was said it seems that people have been doing a bit of research on me, and if that is the case, I can't quite see how anyone thought I was any of the malicious people I have witnessed on here.
Anyway... I am happy to draw a line in the sand and move on and will forget all posts to date. No hard feelings etc. okay?
For the record, I will just reiterate where I am on this case. I don't know whether JB is guilty or innocent (as I said before, my opinion counts for diddly squat in the scheme of things anyway, so who cares?!), but there are certain things that I can't personally get over (as yet), and they are likely to have been things the jury considered important too, so I am not convinced as yet that their decision should be interfered with. I do accept, as I think everyone does, that the investigation was badly handled and there are unanswered questions - due to the time lapse and destruction of evidence some of these things will remain so unfortunately. I have not seen the content of the current appeal and so do not know precisely the extent of the grounds, so I do not know if there is something out there that will change my mind. However, like many, even if the appeal fails I still want to see the justification for the PII and witholding of documents/evidence. I think that the CCRC knows that they need to nail this case once and for all with a convincing decision, or it will continually come back to haunt them. Which I think is why they are extending the process to cover everything. Obviously if there is a referral then we'll have to wait longer for the answers.
