It's in the COA.
No, it's not. We've been over this before, many times.
In their 2002 judgment, the Court of Appeal say that Sheila was "probably in a sedated state" and the drug she was on was known to have "sedative side effects at the levels prescribed". But the judges had no expert opinion to rely on for these views. Dr. Ferguson, in his statement of 9th. August 1985, states only that the drug would have had a slightly sedating effect, but he doesn't know what the effect was on Sheila because he had not seen her since her dose was lowered.
You have no evidence to say that Sheila was sedated, assuming you even understand what the term 'sedated' means and its significance. Sedated does not mean asleep. There are witnesses to Sheila's general physical state on the 7th. August 1985, but these witnesses give us conflicting accounts.