Demonstration et Chelmsford Police HQ Today

[lookout]

Well, IF they do, it further raises the question of how did a 999 call from Nevill become lost -within minutes- on the very night the call is alleged to have been made. JB wasn't a suspect. They hadn't even seen the crime scene. Mick has suggested that, between them, West and Bonnet decided to lose it in case it was decided to prosecute JB later. Why would they? The two people probably furthest down the pecking order were hardly the ones to take such a momentous decision. I find that idea preposterous.

Nothing was lost, it was mishandled. A complete lack of communication and sheer confusion between officers  after receiving two calls from the same name of Bamber ( two different people ) separate households. Oh the confusion 
If the night in question had been a particularly quiet one before the calls, then there'd have been a mad scramble to begin working.Then came the excuses about the clock being 10 minutes fast-----no it wasn't ( when asked at trial ) it was usually right, to the minute as was the final decision.

[Jane]

Nothing was lost, it was mishandled. A complete lack of communication and sheer confusion between officers  after receiving two calls from the same name of Bamber ( two different people ) separate households. Oh the confusion 
If the night in question had been a particularly quiet one before the calls, then there'd have been a mad scramble to begin working.Then came the excuses about the clock being 10 minutes fast-----no it wasn't ( when asked at trial ) it was usually right, to the minute as was the final decision.

I can't see how such could possibly happen, especially when one is alleged to have been put through as a 999 call. As for the rest, it's a succession of "ifs" which all need to fall into place at exactly the right moment for what you're suggesting to occur. 

[killingeve]

Nothing was lost, it was mishandled. A complete lack of communication and sheer confusion between officers  after receiving two calls from the same name of Bamber ( two different people ) separate households. Oh the confusion 
If the night in question had been a particularly quiet one before the calls, then there'd have been a mad scramble to begin working.Then came the excuses about the clock being 10 minutes fast-----no it wasn't ( when asked at trial ) it was usually right, to the minute as was the final decision.

Wrong as usual!  There was one call only from Bamber to PC West.  Not a scrap of evidence exists to the contrary. 

26. PC West recorded the time of the appellant's call as 3.36 a.m. At trial it was accepted that the officer had misread a digital clock. The officer's contact with Mr Bonnett was recorded as being at 3.26 a.m. and it seems clear that the appellant's call must have been at 3.26 a.m. or very shortly before.

[lookout]

I can't see how such could possibly happen, especially when one is alleged to have been put through as a 999 call. As for the rest, it's a succession of "ifs" which all need to fall into place at exactly the right moment for what you're suggesting to occur.

Didn't Nevill ring 999 before he rang JB ?

[Jane]

Didn't Nevill ring 999 before he rang JB ?

Despite assurances to the contrary, there doesn't seem to be a shred of evidence supporting such. There's also the point that, HAD such a call come through, the independent operator who took the call and put it through, would have recalled and recorded it. Somehow, from being seen as a cock-up being made because police wanted to frame JB, if we take it back to the first few minutes, it changes to simply being a mishandled call. Can it really be seen as being both?

[killingeve]

Didn't Nevill ring 999 before he rang JB ?

When is it going to register that not a scrap of evidence exists that anyone called anyone other than Bamber calling PC West. 

[JackieD]

She has removed her Facebook profile. But Caroline was friends with her when her profile was active. Remember when she uploaded photos of all JBs letters on the floor?

😊😊😊

[JackieD]

VERY difficult for her considering Carol Ann doesn't have a Facebook account. Not that I want to show you as being a spiteful, lying *-*-*

Threats and lies again from Jane the troll

[JackieD]

Video update from today's demonstration.  Link below is to Peter Tatchell giving some lady police officer the third degree because she won't accept the letter from him.  Not sure what point Mr Tatchell is trying to make.  Police officers aren't postmen, but anyway, make of it what you will.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64zjyCaO4ec

The letter needs to be sent special delivery
Someone has to sign for the letter and then you can go on your lap top and see who has signed for it hi

[Jane]

Threats and lies again from Jane the troll

Where have I lied? Where have I threatened you?

[JackieD]

VERY difficult for her considering Carol Ann doesn't have a Facebook account. Not that I want to show you as being a spiteful, lying *-*-*

Jane Trolling and again threatening again

Thank you David