Nevill's call to Bamber. What was Sheila doing?

[killingeve]

Like most people, answering such a call would put the fear of God into you knowing that Sheila had been unpredictable in the past when Nevill's calls for assistance had been needed, so hesitation would be the norm in some while getting their head together to ring back for more information and as RJ pointed out when JB tried to ring back he found the phone engaged which would have been Nevill ringing the police at that time.

When did Mr Bamber make a call for assistance prior to Bamber's claims of such a call on 7th Aug?

[JackieD]

Facts. I know Mugford is a prolific liar with a long criminal history and as the main prosecution witness who failed to be cross examined sufficiently in the witness box there is a need for every note, statement etc to be scrutinised by the CCRC.  With this evidence too hand along with the latest information regarding when the NOTW deal was signed there will be clear evidence if this conviction is unsafe. This case has cost millions and now the commissioners must do the right thing.

[JackieD]

When did Mr Bamber make a call for assistance prior to Bamber's claims of such a call on 7th Aug?

Boring

[killingeve]

Boring

Not as boring as your repetitive attacks on the chief prosection witness. 

[lookout]

When did Mr Bamber make a call for assistance prior to Bamber's claims of such a call on 7th Aug?

I don't know when----dates or times or anything, only that it's been said on the forum. I think even JB himself has mentioned it or someone else on his behalf.

[killingeve]

I don't know when----dates or times or anything, only that it's been said on the forum. I think even JB himself has mentioned it or someone else on his behalf.

I thought you hade improved recently but now you're reverting to type and just flooding the board with rubbish. 

Someone saying something on the forum doesn't make it anything like factually correct.  If you can't back it up with a statement or such like don't bother or I will start taking screen shots and make a case for a ban.  Its unfair on those who produce a source. 

[lookout]

I thought you hade improved recently but now you're reverting to type and just flooding the board with rubbish. 

Someone saying something on the forum doesn't make it anything like factually correct.  If you can't back it up with a statement or such like don't bother or I will start taking screen shots and make a case for a ban.  Its unfair on those who produce a source.

For goodness sake----you're not in the courtroom now ! What's your problem ? A ban for forgetting something ?

[killingeve]

For goodness sake----you're not in the courtroom now ! What's your problem ? A ban for forgetting something ?

What's your objective in flooding the board with unsupported nonsense? 

[lookout]

What's your objective in flooding the board with unsupported nonsense?

I think you're getting confused. It's Adam who floods the forum with his boring repetitive posts which are spaced to make it look a lot.

Do show me where I've " flooded the board ".

[killingeve]

I think you're getting confused. It's Adam who floods the forum with his boring repetitive posts which are spaced to make it look a lot.

Do show me where I've " flooded the board ".

You've made 45k plus posts!  You post day in day out without any regard for quality.  Its quality that counts not quantity.  Going forward can you please check the veracity of what it is you're claiming before you post. Or at the very least pose it as a question rather than a statement of fact.  If you're looking for social interaction then may I politely suggest coffee mornings or if you prefer online then forums dedicated to benign subjects such as cooking and gardening.  Talking of which I am off to do the latter.

[Roch]

You post day in day out without any regard for quality.

TBF, there is more to quality than insisting on links being included in every post. Nor is quality assured by an over heavy reliance upon the 2002 appeal. Likewise, quality cannot be assured by constantly going out of your way to give the police and prosecution every benefit of the doubt, every leeway, every excuse, every interpretation benign.

That being said, I'm not saying that every single post you make lacks quality.

[JackieD]

For goodness sake----you're not in the courtroom now ! What's your problem ? A ban for forgetting something ?

Just another weirdo with nothing better to do. So sad obviously has issues

[Adam]

When did Mr Bamber make a call for assistance prior to Bamber's claims of such a call on 7th Aug?

Lookout has often said Nevill had previously phoned Bamber for assistance with Sheila. Even Bamber has never said this.

I don't know why Lookout makes things up with all her posts.

[guest29835]

You've made 45k plus posts!  You post day in day out without any regard for quality.  Its quality that counts not quantity.  Going forward can you please check the veracity of what it is you're claiming before you post. Or at the very least pose it as a question rather than a statement of fact.  If you're looking for social interaction then may I politely suggest coffee mornings or if you prefer online then forums dedicated to benign subjects such as cooking and gardening.  Talking of which I am off to do the latter.

Lookout has done nothing to you and I see no excuse for this outburst.

[lookout]

Lookout has done nothing to you and I see no excuse for this outburst.

Thankyou for that QC.