Author Topic: Julie does not sound to sure?  (Read 10342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2021, 12:19:PM »




Steve, he had the brass neck to state on national TV that he'd hoped for a reconciliation. He had no intentions with all the females he was knocking off ! Even on his wedding night.
The wedding night anecdote is unsubstantiated. Sheila was admittedly very difficult to live with, which is why Colin rightly chose to leave the marital home. I might add that none of the Caffells were remotely materialistic in nature, in sharp contrast to the predator who is Jeremy Bamber.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2021, 12:20:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2021, 01:06:PM »
The wedding night anecdote is unsubstantiated. Sheila was admittedly very difficult to live with, which is why Colin rightly chose to leave the marital home. I might add that none of the Caffells were remotely materialistic in nature, in sharp contrast to the predator who is Jeremy Bamber.





In his book, he'd wished Sheila dead because she leant on him a lot. He got his wish, didn't he ?
 I notice he didn't tell anyone that, except probably to Sheila ! That alone would have been on her mind and besides everything else in her life, would definitely have had a bearing on what happened.

This dead beat also left Sheila and the twins during an affair he had. The twins were about 5 months old.
His idea of marriage with the daughter of wealthy parents, was to make sure that there were plenty of babies for Sheila so that he could continue his life-style of womanising, leaving Sheila to look after children. Whenever they went out it was always " someone else " who took Sheila home---never Colin !
The twins and Sheila didn't appear to enjoy any outings in the car ( courtesy of the Bambers ) What DID Colin do to improve their lives ?

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2021, 01:44:PM »




In his book, he'd wished Sheila dead because she leant on him a lot. He got his wish, didn't he ?
 I notice he didn't tell anyone that, except probably to Sheila ! That alone would have been on her mind and besides everything else in her life, would definitely have had a bearing on what happened.

This dead beat also left Sheila and the twins during an affair he had. The twins were about 5 months old.
His idea of marriage with the daughter of wealthy parents, was to make sure that there were plenty of babies for Sheila so that he could continue his life-style of womanising, leaving Sheila to look after children. Whenever they went out it was always " someone else " who took Sheila home---never Colin !
The twins and Sheila didn't appear to enjoy any outings in the car ( courtesy of the Bambers ) What DID Colin do to improve their lives ?
An awful lot. He had full care and control those last few months. He took them to the Planetarium, art galleries and the Royal Albert Hall. They visited their aunt in Norway. They planted sunflowers together.

I'm really surprised at you lookout.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2021, 02:28:PM »
An awful lot. He had full care and control those last few months. He took them to the Planetarium, art galleries and the Royal Albert Hall. They visited their aunt in Norway. They planted sunflowers together.

I'm really surprised at you lookout.





I'm talking about when Sheila was alive.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2021, 03:49:PM »




I'm talking about when Sheila was alive.
I don't know what you mean. He did all these activities whilst Sheila was alive. It was June whom he expressed imprecatory thoughts towards, not Sheila.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2021, 04:30:PM »
I don't think Colin and Sheila would have reconciled in the future, but everyone is guessing and doesn't know for sure how events would have transpired. I do feel that Colin was the only man Sheila really loved and if he couldn't live with her then nobody could.


Why did Colin go on National TV and say it ???
Obviously to cover up his massive failings as her husband

Steve you are actually losing your mind to say Colin was the only person Sheila loved
The fact is you have no idea so why make ridiculous comments
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2021, 04:32:PM »
The wedding night anecdote is unsubstantiated. Sheila was admittedly very difficult to live with, which is why Colin rightly chose to leave the marital home. I might add that none of the Caffells were remotely materialistic in nature, in sharp contrast to the predator who is Jeremy Bamber.

The wedding night anecdote is unsubstantiated just like Mugfords claims are unsubstantiated
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2021, 04:49:PM »

Why did Colin go on National TV and say it ???
Obviously to cover up his massive failings as her husband

Steve you are actually losing your mind to say Colin was the only person Sheila loved
The fact is you have no idea so why make ridiculous comments
I think some members are too busy contemplating their own navels to get at the truth. The only people who can really comment on a marriage are the two that are in it. Notwithstanding neither Colin nor Sheila were materialistic, nor did they find suitable partners immediately after the divorce.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #23 on: October 30, 2021, 04:52:PM »
The wedding night anecdote is unsubstantiated just like Mugfords claims are unsubstantiated
Circumstantial evidence is like a rope made up of a number of strands. One strand may not be sufficient to sustain a weight, but sufficient strands working together may do so.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2021, 06:15:PM »
I think some members are too busy contemplating their own navels to get at the truth. The only people who can really comment on a marriage are the two that are in it. Notwithstanding neither Colin nor Sheila were materialistic, nor did they find suitable partners immediately after the divorce.

Why are you commenting then?

Colin has consistently made money out of the tragedy books, tv appearances
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2021, 06:16:PM »
Circumstantial evidence is like a rope made up of a number of strands. One strand may not be sufficient to sustain a weight, but sufficient strands working together may do so.


Fact Unsubstantiated
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2021, 06:20:PM »

Fact Unsubstantiated


Julie must be so famous in Canada where she lives.

I wonder what friends, colleagues and her children think of her behaviour and the photos of her posing like a Cheshire Cat in her underwear

What an embarrassment

She obviously never took into account the internet would happen 😊😊😊
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2021, 06:24:PM »
Why are you commenting then?

Colin has consistently made money out of the tragedy books, tv appearances
..because your vile attacks on Colin, who suffered the most grievous loss of all the players in this tragedy, will not go unnoticed or unpunished.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44386
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2021, 06:24:PM »
Circumstantial evidence is like a rope made up of a number of strands. One strand may not be sufficient to sustain a weight, but sufficient strands working together may do so.

There is a mountain of 'circumstantial' evidence against Bamber.

He's the only alive suspect!
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Julie does not sound to sure?
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2021, 06:37:PM »
There is a mountain of 'circumstantial' evidence against Bamber.

He's the only alive suspect!
I came to this case 10 years ago with an open mind. I found myself jumping over more hurdles than Karsten Warholm. At that point I realized he was guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2021, 06:37:PM by Steve_uk »