Author Topic: Questions for Steve  (Read 5613 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #60 on: October 23, 2021, 09:59:AM »
JB was so patient whereas anyone else in his position wouldn't have been.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #61 on: October 23, 2021, 10:06:AM »
The one you have read is a one sided summary for public consumption. The other is the whole oral hearing and it tells a rather different story.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9957.msg454156.html#msg454156

I'm interested in what the court concluded.  As William Clegg QC said 'you want to know what the prosecution are saying' as a starting point!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GW6MM7dLhuY

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #62 on: October 23, 2021, 10:26:AM »
I remember reading that and was horrified at the arrogant and pompous idiots with their shameful----but typical behaviour of those on the side of the majority. What chance does anyone have ?





I know Justice Kay was a prosecuting judge, not sure of the others but also during the trial Rivlin too was a prosecuting judge. You can't tell me that their work on defence cases can't be anything else but biased !
They obviously have more knowledge when prosecuting than defencing.
If it was me being defended I'd demand a judge whose prime knowledge was defending.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #63 on: October 23, 2021, 10:34:AM »




I know Justice Kay was a prosecuting judge, not sure of the others but also during the trial Rivlin too was a prosecuting judge.You can't tell me that their work on defence cases can't be anything else but biased !
They obviously have more knowledge when prosecuting than defencing.
If it was me being defended I'd demand a judge whose prime knowledge was defending.

 :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o


Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #64 on: October 23, 2021, 10:41:AM »




I know Justice Kay was a prosecuting judge, not sure of the others but also during the trial Rivlin too was a prosecuting judge. You can't tell me that their work on defence cases can't be anything else but biased !
They obviously have more knowledge when prosecuting than defencing.
If it was me being defended I'd demand a judge whose prime knowledge was defending.

Utterly clueless. 

https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/the-judiciary-the-government-and-the-constitution/jud-acc-ind/independence/

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #65 on: October 23, 2021, 10:43:AM »




I know Justice Kay was a prosecuting judge, not sure of the others but also during the trial Rivlin too was a prosecuting judge. You can't tell me that their work on defence cases can't be anything else but biased !
They obviously have more knowledge when prosecuting than defencing.
If it was me being defended I'd demand a judge whose prime knowledge was defending.

I don't believe you have learning difficulties rather you have a terrible attitude and the worst listening skills I have ever encountered in my life.


Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #66 on: October 23, 2021, 11:19:AM »
I don't believe you have learning difficulties rather you have a terrible attitude and the worst listening skills I have ever encountered in my life.


Can we have some moderation on this forum for this obvious troll who is more than likely the troll Matt
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #67 on: October 23, 2021, 11:20:AM »
And your attitude stinks !!

At least I speak the truth as it's people like you who wouldn't know the truth if it poked you in the eye !

Once anyone here starts with their insults/ abuse I know I've hit a chord which brings out the nasty person that you are !

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #68 on: October 23, 2021, 11:25:AM »
Jackie at my time of life I don't have to tolerate this ill-mannered oaf. What a nasty piece of work it is !!

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #69 on: October 23, 2021, 11:29:AM »
People/Things like these CLEARLY come on this forum at very sensitive times to disrupt and stop genuine posters who want to learn more about this horrendous miscarriage of justice case

Anyone who research this case knows for a FACT this is an unsafe conviction

That is undeniable
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #70 on: October 23, 2021, 11:35:AM »
Lookout these trolls know the truth about the murders is so close to coming out. So many great producers and documentary makers queuing up to rubbish the Carol Anne Lee and Louis Theroux efforts

The general public won’t be disappointed by the actual truth
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #71 on: October 23, 2021, 11:39:AM »
The one you have read is a one sided summary for public consumption. The other is the whole oral hearing and it tells a rather different story.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9957.msg454156.html#msg454156
This is just a complaint on the manner of the presiding judges. There's no evidence whatsoever contained therein.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #72 on: October 23, 2021, 11:42:AM »
Lookout these trolls know the truth about the murders is so close to coming out. So many great producers and documentary makers queuing up to rubbish the Carol Anne Lee and Louis Theroux efforts

The general public won’t be disappointed by the actual truth





Adam must be delighted that he has a cowardly side-kick like himself.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #73 on: October 23, 2021, 12:24:PM »




Adam must be delighted that he has a cowardly side-kick like himself.


At least we spotted it immediately. Thes people obviously have no lives
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44394
Re: Questions for Steve
« Reply #74 on: October 23, 2021, 12:52:PM »
I don't believe you have learning difficulties rather you have a terrible attitude and the worst listening skills I have ever encountered in my life.

I received a PM when joining the forum. Part of it saying Lookout was dim & another (former poster) was one of the biggest Bamber defenders.

I don't believe Lookout is as dim as she makes out. Just a lazy poster who wants to deflect posts from guilters. This is through a combination of unsourced new statements which contradict sourced information & repeatedly asking the same questions.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2021, 12:53:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.