Evidence relatives dismantled silencer & Robert Boutflour's blood contaminated?

[killingeve]

Why don't you find it for a change ? Afterall, the search facility is easy enough.

You're the one making the claim so the onus is on you. 

[Adam]

You're the one making the claim so the onus is on you.

Lookout has never provided a source since joining the forum 9 years ago.

[killingeve]

At trial Robert Boutflour was asked

Did you personally at any stage touch it?  No.

[lookout]

You're the one making the claim so the onus is on you.

No, it was Adam who said " best find the source "----so he can get cracking, can't he ?

[Adam]

No, it was Adam who said " best find the source "----so he can get cracking, can't he ?

I didn't make the claim.

[killingeve]

No, it was Adam who said " best find the source "----so he can get cracking, can't he ?

No. As I said the onus is on the poster wishing to assert something to find the source. Also called forum etiquette. 

[killingeve]

At trial Robert Boutflour was asked

Did you personally at any stage touch it?  No.

For some reason I'm unable to provide the link but its under Robert Boutflours statements in the libarary - court evidence - page 1.

[killingeve]

It doesn't make them always wrong either. Therefore, in reality, they are partially reliable. If Jeremy Bamber is innocent, then by default you must agree that our entire justice system from Bews upwards, including Dickinson, COLP, Stokenchurch, the 2002 appeal judges, the 2012 CCRC etc, are all unreliable sources.

Its up to you who/what you rely on for information but I would certainly never use the support group/website for reliable information.   

Anyway I think the operative word above is 'If'.

[David1819]

[killingeve]

You believe Ann Eaton deliberately/knowingly contaminated the silencer with diluted period blood from a pair of Sheila's knickers left to soak in a bucket of water   

How would she overcome all the points in Adam's post re the relatives fabricating the silencer?

I believe the sort of tests carried out to identify blood groupings requires good quality blood samples of a certain quantity.  How does very diluted period blood fit this criteria?  The ratio would be about 1:1,000,000. 

[Bubo bubo]

There you go. It seems although AE did not move in till after the conviction she says she went in every day!

[Adam]

You believe Ann Eaton deliberately/knowingly contaminated the silencer with diluted period blood from a pair of Sheila's knickers left to soak in a bucket of water   

How would she overcome all the points in Adam's post re the relatives fabricating the silencer?

I believe the sort of tests carried out to identify blood groupings requires good quality blood samples of a certain quantity.  How does very diluted period blood fit this criteria?  The ratio would be about 1:1,000,000.

The ratio would be about 1:1,000,000.

----------

That sounds about right.

As said the relatives would not have the idea in the first place.

[Adam]

The Q & A is just saying AE found diluted period blood knickers in a bucket of water. Together with other clothes.

She tried washing them & then threw them away.

This is already known.

[Adam]

AE wouldn't have such a sick idea in the first place. Partly because it was impossible to do.

Even the CT agree. Agreeing it is human blood matching Sheila's. But claiming RB put his own blood inside!

[Adam]

AE wouldn't have such a sick idea in the first place. Partly because it was impossible to do.

Even the CT agree. Agreeing it is human blood matching Sheila's. But claiming RB put his own blood inside!

Even the CT agree. Agreeing it is human blood matching Sheila's. But claiming RB put his own blood inside

----------

The relatives wouldn't have such a sick idea either. In such a short time span.

They would need to find out a mountain of information. Which would be impossible to obtain without alerting the police.