0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Being as the man is now dead---nothing.
What are you basing your claims on that the relatives dismantled the silencer and Robert Boutflour's blood ended up inside? What difference does it make if the person is alive or dead?
Quite uppity, aren't you ? You either don't read posts or you can't think for yourself. Which is it ?
Why am I going to rely on posts? Do you honestly think posts are going to assist Bamber?
You don't know who reads posts and judging by yours they don't exactly shout encouragement do they ?
I tell you one thing for absolute certainty, posts made on this forum are not a reliable source of information especially when they do not contain any supporting evidence. Shout encouragement about what?
Mike has put up plenty of documented evidence, I don't know what you mean.
I dont know who created the library etc. Yes some of the material is reliable eg pathology reports, trial testimony from pathologists, but those of you who believe Bamber innocent then claim these people are corrupt or incompetent.
Because perhaps I have a habit of seeing both sides, i.e. what JB says against what these others say too, whereas your mind is just one-track only.
And now you're a mind reader? Who are you referring to when you say "others"?
Know-it-alls. Those who don't allow you to have a view of your own.
So it seems this one can be put to bed since no one has offered up any evidence to support the relatives dismantling the silencer and Robert Boutflour's blood contaminating?