Author Topic: Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission  (Read 35400 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
The latest podcast is Peter Tatchell. Quite enjoyed it. Not sure whether there was a Freudian slip by Philip of the CT. Tatchell advocates for picket type protests regarding non-disclosure, which in turn prompts Philip to suggest that such direct action could be an option, should the current submissions fail at the CCRC. I would expect the CT to remain positive until told otherwise - but this doesn't seem a very positive remark.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
The latest podcast is Peter Tatchell. Quite enjoyed it. Not sure whether there was a Freudian slip by Philip of the CT. Tatchell advocates for picket type protests regarding non-disclosure, which in turn prompts Philip to suggest that such direct action could be an option, should the current submissions fail at the CCRC. I would expect the CT to remain positive until told otherwise - but this doesn't seem a very positive remark.

I think it’s very hard to be positive when we keep reminding ourselves of how many silencers there are floating about, the police helping out anti Jeremy dramas and the continued withholding of all case related evidence regarding Mugford

But everyone is aware of how much the public loves true crime documentaries and there is absolutely tons of information still to be disclosed to the public. It’s coming

David Boutflour was crying his eyes out for a reason. Not the cocky person he was in previous documentaries
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
The latest podcast is Peter Tatchell. Quite enjoyed it. Not sure whether there was a Freudian slip by Philip of the CT. Tatchell advocates for picket type protests regarding non-disclosure, which in turn prompts Philip to suggest that such direct action could be an option, should the current submissions fail at the CCRC. I would expect the CT to remain positive until told otherwise - but this doesn't seem a very positive remark.

What did you enjoy about it?  He could have said what he did in less than half the time. 

Does Peter Tatchell realise Bamber is withholding vital docs from the public eg his 2012 100 page doc from the commission giving a belt and braces why it was unable to refer? 

Picket type protests?   ;D  Who is going to take part?  JackieD, Lookout, yourself and the support group? 

It is plainly obvious the submission is going nowhere.  Will the support group make an announcement?  And will they reveal the warts and all document? 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
I await to see what sort of a mess the CCRC make of this submission.
Is it possible that anyone can do the job they were appointed to do ?  ::)

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
I await to see what sort of a mess the CCRC make of this submission.
Is it possible that anyone can do the job they were appointed to do ?  ::)

Its unlikely we will ever know as I doubt Bamber will release the document.