The latest podcast is Peter Tatchell. Quite enjoyed it. Not sure whether there was a Freudian slip by Philip of the CT. Tatchell advocates for picket type protests regarding non-disclosure, which in turn prompts Philip to suggest that such direct action could be an option, should the current submissions fail at the CCRC. I would expect the CT to remain positive until told otherwise - but this doesn't seem a very positive remark.
What did you enjoy about it? He could have said what he did in less than half the time.
Does Peter Tatchell realise Bamber is withholding vital docs from the public eg his 2012 100 page doc from the commission giving a belt and braces why it was unable to refer?
Picket type protests?

Who is going to take part? JackieD, Lookout, yourself and the support group?
It is plainly obvious the submission is going nowhere. Will the support group make an announcement? And will they reveal the warts and all document?