Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[David1819]

In 2002, Justice Kay et al ruled it was Christopher Columbus, after an appeal based on the argument it was Leif Erikson was thrown out. In fact, the more the judge's looked at, the more it became apparent to them that it was Christopher Columbus. This has set a really high bar for any future referrals to the court of appeal, with the intention of overturning the original Christopher Columbus decision.

WTF? 

[killingeve]

Wow...I only just discovered that the submission thrown in Apr 2012 was originally submitted to the commission in Mar 2004.  On this basis we will have to wait to learn the outcome of the Mar 2021 submission until around Apr 2029!

[David1819]

Wow...I only just discovered that the submission thrown in Apr 2012 was originally submitted to the commission in Mar 2004.  On this basis we will have to wait to learn the outcome of the Mar 2021 submission until around Apr 2029!

Incorrect.

[Adam]

Incorrect.

Elaborate.

You have not got the gravitas to post a one word dismissal.

[killingeve]

Incorrect.

Elucidate. 

[Adam]

It looks like David is not going to elaborate.

Therefore his 'incorrect' is dismissed.

[lookout]

The legal representative behind all the 347,000 documents which had to be scrutinised from ground level, is Joe Stone QC and his junior council Matt Stanbury.
I'm sure that Joe Stone thought the case worthwhile to fight for or he wouldn't have touched it.

The submission isn't all about Jeremy's innocence, but a very detailed and focussed application based on material which has been uncovered since 2011.


"Press Note : We will only be commenting on Major events in the case that can be made public and otherwise will not be elaborating on the evidence before the commission at this stage ".

[JackieD]

The legal representative behind all the 347,000 documents which had to be scrutinised from ground level, is Joe Stone QC and his junior council Matt Stanbury.
I'm sure that Joe Stone thought the case worthwhile to fight for or he wouldn't have touched it.

The submission isn't all about Jeremy's innocence, but a very detailed and focussed application based on material which has been uncovered since 2011.


"Press Note : We will only be commenting on Major events in the case that can be made public and otherwise will not be elaborating on the evidence before the commission at this stage ".

👏👏👏

[David1819]

Elucidate.

The legal work done in 2004 had nothing to do with the CCRC in 2012. A submission was made in 2010 and rejected in 2012.

[killingeve]

The legal representative behind all the 347,000 documents which had to be scrutinised from ground level, is Joe Stone QC and his junior council Matt Stanbury.
I'm sure that Joe Stone thought the case worthwhile to fight for or he wouldn't have touched it.

The submission isn't all about Jeremy's innocence, but a very detailed and focussed application based on material which has been uncovered since 2011.


"Press Note : We will only be commenting on Major events in the case that can be made public and otherwise will not be elaborating on the evidence before the commission at this stage ".

Wrong as usual.  Just more flooding the board with misinformation.  Joe Stone QC was instructed by Bamber to launch a court challenge over CPS withholding evidence (Dec '19).  He failed

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8392497/High-Court-rejects-Jeremy-Bamber-bid-release-evidence-claims-clear-murder.html

[killingeve]

The legal work done in 2004 had nothing to do with the CCRC in 2012. A submission was made in 2010 and rejected in 2012.

I hope you're right.  2029 seems an awfully long time based on what I quoted.  The thought of succumbing to 8 years of podcasts put out by the support group in moments of weakness is more than I could bear 

[Adam]

I don't know why David gives a one word dismissal. Then ekaborates with a short unsourced post the following day.

Maybe he wants attention.

[Adam]

The legal work done in 2004 had nothing to do with the CCRC in 2012. A submission was made in 2010 and rejected in 2012.

If right, 2 years is a long time.

[killingeve]

I don't know why David gives a one word dismissal. Then ekaborates with a short unsourced post the following day.

Maybe he wants attention.

I give him slack.  Lots of teenageers, especially boys in my experience, go through monosyllabic phases. 

[David1819]

I give him slack.  Lots of teenageers, especially boys in my experience, go through monosyllabic phases.

I'm 31