Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[Adam]

The 'trick of the light' was so trivial Bamber didn't mention it in  his WS, police interviews or testimony.

So not surprised Bews can't remember who saw it. If it was Bamber, it was simply part of the insinuation plan. So Bews & Saxby automatically decided it was a 'trick of the light'.

But appreciate this minor thing has escalated over the last 36 years.

[Rob_]

The 'trick of the light' was so trivial Bamber didn't mention it in  his WS, police interviews or testimony.

So not surprised Bews can't remember who saw it. If it was Bamber, it was simply part of the insinuation plan. So Bews & Saxby automatically decided it was a 'trick of the light'.

But appreciate this minor thing has escalated over the last 36 years.

Keep up Adam it was Bews and Myall who decided it was nothing but then ran anyway. I find this event very interesting actually.

[Bubo bubo]

Bubo you are wasting your time, it’s a wind up and he did exactly the same the last time an application was made to the CCRC. I’m ignoring the think now. What a sick individual

I hear you. We have had QC and QT I wonder what happened to  QD thru QS. Maybe we might expect them to drop by in the near future.

[killingeve]

Read the non disclosure booklet. It might be in there (situation report) prior to force arms being drawn.

And if you had access to the review commissions statement of reasons for not referring Bamber's last submission, which Bamber refuses to disclose, you might feel very differently about aspects of the case!

[killingeve]

If you cared to read posts that are on this forum you will see that arguments have been advanced that suggest that Bews and Myall rewrote their witness statements and pocket books. You still have not read why I think there are issues with PV25 and PV26. If you take investigating this case seriously you have to read the evidence presented by people who claim innocence. Purely going by the case material here is a waste of time since if JB was framed you would expect the police to do a thorough job ensuring their case was solid.

Despite the fact that we only have a tiny fraction of the information available many have highlighted  considerable number of issues contained in the information we do have. Some of these may well be part of the latest submission.
It is no good coming on the forum to spout the Crowns case, we all know it inside out. If you were truly serious in your endeavour's you would examine what people on here have found and generally absorb their stances on a whole variety of issues. We cannot debate with someone who only understands one side of the argument. If you are not prepared to do this then technically you might be considered a troll but if I may say not a nasty one.

We do have Bamber's first statement dated 7th Aug 1985 and not a word about the 'trick of the light', movement in house, lights on/off, curtains opening/closing.  Bamber has never claimed his statement was altered.  Furthermore no one else mentioned such either those present or others that might have heard second hand eg Colin Caffell. 

This is simply Bamber scraping the barrel. 

[killingeve]

Which is why Bew's ran to his car as though his backside was on fire.

Perhaps you could explain why Bamber overlooked mentioning this in his statement of 7th August 1985. 

[killingeve]

All those who were " helping police with their enquiries " were quite adept at seeing things that weren't there ! Maybe QT has caught the bug too.

You're the one claiming things that simply do not exist.

[killingeve]

Keep up Adam it was Bews and Myall who decided it was nothing but then ran anyway. I find this event very interesting actually.

If they ran away why didn't Bamber refer to this in his statement of 7th August 1985?  Or during his police interviews?  Or at trial?

[killingeve]

Bubo you are wasting your time, it’s a wind up and he did exactly the same the last time an application was made to the CCRC. I’m ignoring the think now. What a sick individual

You post such drivel I could be forgiven for thinking the State planted you here as a stooge!

I bet you don't ignore me because you wil lack the discipline to follow through!

[killingeve]

The 'trick of the light' was so trivial Bamber didn't mention it in  his WS, police interviews or testimony.

So not surprised Bews can't remember who saw it. If it was Bamber, it was simply part of the insinuation plan. So Bews & Saxby automatically decided it was a 'trick of the light'.

But appreciate this minor thing has escalated over the last 36 years.

The voice of reason 

[killingeve]

If the glow in the bedroom window is a light bulb can someone please tell me what the exact same glow is around the door handle on the main door.  Thanks.

Any ideas about the above?

[lookout]

One thing for sure, the sun wouldn't have been that high at the time of the morning EP were there. It would have only been about 05.20 before the sun would even show itself at that time of the year, so no doubt it was an electric light. As for any other area which appeared to be illuminated, it only needs one light on to reflect into an adjoining room before daylight begins.

[lookout]

You're the one claiming things that simply do not exist.

I know what I mean even if you don't !

[lookout]

Perhaps you could explain why Bamber overlooked mentioning this in his statement of 7th August 1985.

It wasn't JB who saw it first, so he'd have been relying on the officers present to do the explaining.
IF he had been the one who'd first reported the sighting it would have been looked on as " another way out of him committing any crime by seeing someone alive inside ". Whatever he said he couldn't win----and sadly didn't, as he was surrounded by the craftiest sods on this earth !

[Roch]

And if you had access to the review commissions statement of reasons for not referring Bamber's last submission, which Bamber refuses to disclose, you might feel very differently about aspects of the case!

Are you claiming there was no situation report?