Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[JackieD]

Not so much a label more a description.  How would you describe someone who works pro bono AND funds forensic tests?

A hero

[killingeve]

I have just emailed the support group requesting a copy of the submission. 

Hi.  I enjoyed your recent podcast presented by Shaun Atwood.  At the end Yvonne Hartley said if viewers required further info etc to just ask and it would be made available to enable interested parties to form their own opinions.  Therefore I would be grateful if you could email me the full 'Statement of Reasons' issued by the review commission setting out why Jeremy Bamber's submission was declined in 2011/12 as I am unable to locate on your website.

Thank you.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8263.msg392394.html#msg392394

Is this not what you want?

[killingeve]

A hero

Well that as well I guess but sounds like you might have a crush 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWcASV2sey0

[killingeve]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8263.msg392394.html#msg392394

Is this not what you want?

Thanks but no I believe that's the summary and there's a somewhat more comprehensive doc?

[ngb1066]

Thanks but no I believe that's the summary and there's a somewhat more comprehensive doc?

The full document is around 100 pages.

[Roch]

The full document is around 100 pages.

Given what QT has expressed regarding a 'bolt and braces' refusal document, the next one could be 300 pages 

[JackieD]

Well that as well I guess but sounds like you might have a crush 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWcASV2sey0

Not at all Ngb and I fall out all the time but I do believe if he worked exclusively for Jeremy the case would be referred

The help he has given Jeremy is amazing

[killingeve]

The full document is around 100 pages.

Thanks NGB1066.  I would like to read through the document.  I think Bamber himself said in a police interview when something was put to him that 'seeing is believing'.  As the review commission is funded by the tax payer are the public entitled to obtain a copy through a 'Freedom of Information' request?

Philip Walker said in the podcast about 1 hour, 19 mins in something like 'They should ask themselves why Essex police are withholding documents.  We believe its because they're hiding the truth'.  (Philip if you read this forum please can you make available the full 2011/12 Statement of Reasons issued by the review commission by uploading it to Bamber's website.  If you are unwilling or unable to do so, and in the absence of some explanation, your claim about Essex police smacks of hypocrisy). 

[killingeve]

And what of Peter Tatchell who I believe campaigns for Bamber in respect of disclosure of documents.?  Has he seen this document?  Is he aware that the public are being denied access?  Eric Allison? 

And what about those here who are supportive of Bamber have they seen this doc?  If not are you happy to continue supporting Bamber when a 100 page document exists setting out why the review commission was unable to refer Bamber's case which you have effectively been denied access to? 

[Roch]

And what of Peter Tatchell who I believe campaigns for Bamber in respect of disclosure of documents.?  Has he seen this document?  Is he aware that the public are being denied access?  Eric Allison? 

And what about those here who are supportive of Bamber have they seen this doc?  If not are you happy to continue supporting Bamber when a 100 page document exists setting out why the review commission was unable to refer Bamber's case which you have effectively been denied access to?

I have a suggestion, which may be able to help break the deadlock.

[killingeve]

I have a suggestion, which may be able to help break the deadlock.

I'm all ears!

[killingeve]

I have just emailed the support group requesting a copy of the submission. 

Hi.  I enjoyed your recent podcast presented by Shaun Atwood.  At the end Yvonne Hartley said if viewers required further info etc to just ask and it would be made available to enable interested parties to form their own opinions.  Therefore I would be grateful if you could email me the full 'Statement of Reasons' issued by the review commission setting out why Jeremy Bamber's submission was declined in 2011/12 as I am unable to locate on your website.

Thank you.

Ive received a response from Yvonne

Hello XXXXXXX,

Thank you for your e-mail and for listening to the interview.

Unfortunately, we cannot disclose the Statement of Reasons from 2012 at this time, as the legal team and Jeremy haven't authorised the release.

However, if you have any specific questions regarding any of the previous submissions,  i will be happy to help.

Thank you
Kind regards

Yvonne

[killingeve]

I responded

Hi Yvonne

Many thanks for the speedy response.

I would like to read the Statement of Reasons to draw my own conclusions. 

Without wishing to sound rude I think Jeremy Bamber is being somewhat disingenuous by on the one hand claiming non-disclosure of case related material by Essex police is hampering his chances of having his conviction overturned and on the other hand withholding from the general public a vital document that sets out exactly why his 2011/12 submission was not referred to the appeal courts. 

At the end of your podcast you said you want the whole world to know about what you consider to be a miscarriage of justice and yet it seems we are being denied access to documents to enable us to reach informed opinons. 

I am very disappointed about this and wonder if you might speak with Bamber and put to him my argument above and see what he has to say on the matter.

Thank you

XXXXXXX

[killingeve]

I responded

Hi Yvonne

Many thanks for the speedy response.

I would like to read the Statement of Reasons to draw my own conclusions. 

Without wishing to sound rude I think Jeremy Bamber is being somewhat disingenuous by on the one hand claiming non-disclosure of case related material by Essex police is hampering his chances of having his conviction overturned and on the other hand withholding from the general public a vital document that sets out exactly why his 2011/12 submission was not referred to the appeal courts. 

At the end of your podcast you said you want the whole world to know about what you consider to be a miscarriage of justice and yet it seems we are being denied access to documents to enable us to reach informed opinons. 

I am very disappointed about this and wonder if you might speak with Bamber and put to him my argument above and see what he has to say on the matter.

Thank you

XXXXXXX

Lol the X's are my name not kisses!