Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[Adam]

The photo of Sheila shows the bible resting on her arm. Impossible for Sheila to put it there after the second shot. 

Sheila's legs were pulled after the second shot as stated in the COA. The rifle and bible were then put on her.

Rob's claim that after returning the silencer & burning Nevill's back, Bamber would not be able to walk back upstairs has no basis. No one reported Bamber having any walking difficulties after the massacre.

[Rob_]

The photo of Sheila shows the bible resting on her arm. Impossible for Sheila to put it there after the second shot. 

Sheila's legs were pulled after the second shot as stated in the COA. The rifle and bible were then put on her.

Rob's claim that after returning the silencer & burning Nevill's back, Bamber would not be able to walk back upstairs has no basis. No one reported Bamber having any walking difficulties after the massacre.

Adam sorry to say this but I think you are a bit of a joke really sorry to be rude.

I am still waiting for your improved JB scenario Adam? though from what Bill has posted I don't think it matters now.

[lookout]

Adam sorry to say this but I think you are a bit of a joke really sorry to be rude.

I am still waiting for your improved JB scenario Adam? though from what Bill has posted I don't think it matters now.

Notice how he changes tack when there are posts in JB's favour. Adam's going to look silly I'm afraid.

[lookout]

As well as a few more with eggy faces !

[Roch]

The photo of Sheila shows the bible resting on her arm. Impossible for Sheila to put it there after the second shot. 

We know from the TFG that the Bible wasn't originally in that position. So it was either rucked up against her arm by an officer opening the door - or - it was deliberately placed prior to photography. Given that it is covering a peculiar blood stain on the carpet (which we probably only know about due to Mike Tesko photographing the photos obtained by JB's solicitor at the time) I would plum for deliberate placement.

[Rob_]

Notice how he changes tack when there are posts in JB's favour. Adam's going to look silly I'm afraid.

Going to Lookout? he already does I am afraid!. He thinks I said JB cannot go back upstairs because of a walking problem gosh, though maybe it was because of the flippers!

[lookout]

Going to Lookout? he already does I am afraid!. He thinks I said JB cannot go back upstairs because of a walking problem gosh, though maybe it was because of the flippers!

I'm sure you sussed him out a while back Rob.

[Roch]

Is anyone able to explain how a police officer admitting on tape that there was a suicide note at WHF, is the same thing as anonymous scribble on a wardrobe, stating 'I hate this place'? In addition, is anyone able to explain how a professional discussing suicidal ideation, is the same thing as a police officer admitting on tape that a suicide note was found at WHF?

[JackieD]

Is anyone able to explain how a police officer admitting on tape that there was a suicide note at WHF, is the same thing as anonymous scribble on a wardrobe, stating 'I hate this place'? In addition, is anyone able to explain how a professional discussing suicidal ideation, is the same thing as a police officer admitting on tape that a suicide note was found at WHF?

It’s ridiculous

Why is Cambridge cutie so desperate for the application to be thrown out and to make out she is impartial

It’s absolutely vile and I am sick to death of people posting on this forum desperate for the truth NOT to come out

[Adam]

Adam sorry to say this but I think you are a bit of a joke really sorry to be rude.

I am still waiting for your improved JB scenario Adam? though from what Bill has posted I don't think it matters now.

Good old Bill.

What would you like amended?

[David1819]

Adam sorry to say this but I think you are a bit of a joke really sorry to be rude.

I am still waiting for your improved JB scenario Adam? though from what Bill has posted I don't think it matters now.

A bit? 

[Adam]

We know from the TFG that the Bible wasn't originally in that position. So it was either rucked up against her arm by an officer opening the door - or - it was deliberately placed prior to photography. Given that it is covering a peculiar blood stain on the carpet (which we probably only know about due to Mike Tesko photographing the photos obtained by JB's solicitor at the time) I would plum for deliberate placement.

We know from the TFG that the Bible wasn't originally in that position.

----------
Was the bible moved after the police accidentially shot her?

[Roch]

We know from the TFG that the Bible wasn't originally in that position.

----------
Was the bible moved after the police accidentially shot her?

MT has previously suggested so, I believe.

[Bill Robertson]

I think you misunderstand the weight of evidence Bamber needs for an acquittal.

There’s no need for patronizing comment. We are fully aware that the odds are stacked against us. But it’s better to labour for years to discover materials that cast doubt on the conviction than sit and passively accept that the judiciary will always win. It is essential that the evil acts carried out by the police and people such as Mugford and Eaton/Boutflour are exposed even if it doesn’t lead to Jeremy’s release. At least we will have tried.

In terms of “the woman” in the podcast, her name is Yvonne Hartley, one of the finest people I have ever met. Her sacrifices to expose the wrongdoing in the case are staggering. She is an extremely talented investigator and deserves the admiration and respect of everyone.

[killingeve]

Is anyone able to explain how a police officer admitting on tape that there was a suicide note at WHF, is the same thing as anonymous scribble on a wardrobe, stating 'I hate this place'? In addition, is anyone able to explain how a professional discussing suicidal ideation, is the same thing as a police officer admitting on tape that a suicide note was found at WHF?

The 2002 appeal contains 2 arguments which to some extent or another revolve around Sheila's state of mind: open pages of the bible and inscription on the wardrobe (Ground 8 Points 392 - 404 and Ground 9 Points 405 - 421).  If you care to read you will see how the appeal judges have batted away.  Any suicide note will go the same way.  The Court will argue the jury heard about Sheila's state of mind and they still found Bamber guilty.  Then you have all the rest of the evidence against Bamber, particularly the silencer and Julie Mugoford, which will trump any suicide note. 

As Patrick O'Connor said it requires a slam dunk or blockbuster piece of evidence.