Updated Bamber scenario. Matching crime scene evidence.

[Roch]

OK

OK all you like, I am being serious.

[Jane]

Sorry I don't understand that.

Roch, you can't mean that. God knows, way back, I had problems with Adam's 'style'. It hasn't changed. Neither has Adam. My attitude to him has. I think Adam is being made a scapegoat. He's certainly being vilified. We have a poster who calls him names but when Adam complains you tell him you have more to do with your time than reprimand posters for name calling. You put out a general request for it to stop. However, Adam does get singled out for reprimands.

Posters here are adults. They/WE have a choice. If we don't like what a poster has to say, we can use the ignore facility, and have the backbone to ignore quotes. This isn't Coutts Bank. We can't start to get rid of posters because they don't share our values.

[Roch]

Roch, you can't mean that. God knows, way back, I had problems with Adam's 'style'. It hasn't changed. Neither has Adam. My attitude to him has. I think Adam is being made a scapegoat. He's certainly being vilified. We have a poster who calls him names but when Adam complains you tell him you have more to do with your time than reprimand posters for name calling. You put out a general request for it to stop. However, Adam does get singled out for reprimands.

Posters here are adults. They/WE have a choice. If we don't like what a poster has to say, we can use the ignore facility, and have the backbone to ignore quotes. This isn't Coutts Bank. We can't start to get rid of posters because they don't share our values.

He's being accused of spreading dung. If I thought that Adam was not in control of what he was doing, then I might empathise more with him. However, my take on Adam is that he knows exactly what he is doing.

Adam isn't being scapegoated. He's being Adam, deliberately.

[Bubo bubo]

Yep, but not in the same post and I don't have time to go searching through your extensive posts to find those answers. I have posted about many things in the past but if someone asks me something 'genuinely', I will answer them. There's no king of the board here and I'm not hanging on your every word. Answer the questions or don't, it's all the same to me - it's your theory you're trying to promote, I'm not searching to be 'educated' by you!

I am am a republican at heart and have no ambition beyond that of a plebeian. You asked four questions at once, yet you expect me to answer them all. The image post required no reading and covered one question

[Adam]

Roch, you can't mean that. God knows, way back, I had problems with Adam's 'style'. It hasn't changed. Neither has Adam. My attitude to him has. I think Adam is being made a scapegoat. He's certainly being vilified. We have a poster who calls him names but when Adam complains you tell him you have more to do with your time than reprimand posters for name calling. You put out a general request for it to stop. However, Adam does get singled out for reprimands.

Posters here are adults. They/WE have a choice. If we don't like what a poster has to say, we can use the ignore facility, and have the backbone to ignore quotes. This isn't Coutts Bank. We can't start to get rid of posters because they don't share our values.

One poster complains about me creating a thread on the case every 2-4 days. I then get simultaneously & publically attacked, goaded and blocked  while I am offline. 

I spend several months asking that a poster is stopped from hardcore abuse - calling me a Hippo. This is refused.

Make of that what you will.

[Roch]

One poster complains about me creating a thread on the case every 2-4 days. I then get simultaneously & publically attacked, goaded and blocked  while I am offline. 

I spend several months asking that a poster is stopped from hardcore abuse - calling me a Hippo. This is refused.

Make of that what you will.

In your world Adam, in your world. 

[ILB]

One poster complains about me creating a thread on the case every 2-4 days. I then get simultaneously & publically attacked, goaded and blocked  while I am offline. 

I spend several months asking that a poster is stopped from hardcore abuse - calling me a Hippo. This is refused.

Make of that what you will.

You call me an ex criminal a scumbag, " bambers mate"

Should I complain ?

I won't, water off a ducks back. I'm only interested in the case of Jeremy Bamber

[Adam]

You call me an ex criminal a scumbag, " bambers mate"

Should I complain ?

I won't, water off a ducks back. I'm only interested in the case of Jeremy Bamber

Have never said that word before.