Hi...

[killingeve]

Hi.  I joined earlier in the year having watched the ITV series.  Recently watched the Sky doc and thought I would throw in my two-penneth from time-to-time! 

[ngb1066]

Hi.  I joined earlier in the year having watched the ITV series.  Recently watched the Sky doc and thought I would throw in my two-penneth from time-to-time!

Welcome to the forum.

[Steve_uk]

Hi.  I joined earlier in the year having watched the ITV series.  Recently watched the Sky doc and thought I would throw in my two-penneth from time-to-time!

Welcome Cambridgecutie.

[killingeve]

Hey thanks for the welcome guys 

[Roch]

[1] Can the forum member Cambridge Cutie / AKA QT / AKA CC, please identify their current forum name on UK Justice Forum?

[2] Can the above also confirm they are in fact a JB supporter?

[3] Can the above please desist from this current charade of pretending to be a member favouring guilt?

[4] If [3] is not possible, due to a genuine stance change, can this change please be confirmed by the member in question?

[killingeve]

[1] Can the forum member Cambridge Cutie / AKA QT / AKA CC, please identify their current forum name on UK Justice Forum?

[2] Can the above also confirm they are in fact a JB supporter?

[3] Can the above please desist from this current charade of pretending to be a member favouring guilt?

[4] If [3] is not possible, due to a genuine stance change, can this change please be confirmed by the member in question?

The fact it has taken you nearly 2 months to acknowledge my intro says it all really!

And there's no space between Cambridge and Cutie!  Its Cambridgecutie!

[Roch]

The fact it has taken you nearly 2 months to acknowledge my intro says it all really!

And there's no space between Cambridge and Cutie!  Its Cambridgecutie!

Please answer the questions.

[guest29835]

The fact it has taken you nearly 2 months to acknowledge my intro says it all really!

And there's no space between Cambridge and Cutie!  Its Cambridgecutie!

But are you actually a cutie?  That's what I want to know!

Answer the question!  Members have the right to know!

[Roch]

I won't persist with this, if CC refuses to cooperate. But I feel members should take it in to consideration, when digesting and interpreting CC's posts, tactics, approach to the case etc.

[Roch]

Alright CC, I can see you have boxed yourself in to a corner here. I'm guessing you feel it's too late to come clean regarding your little game. You should have come clean from the moment there was any hint that existing members had sussed you out. Well it's your call, if you want to continue posting like some 'glorified Adam' character.  What I don't get is why the likes of Jane and RJ are going along with it as well.

[guest7363]

Alright CC, I can see you have boxed yourself in to a corner here. I'm guessing you feel it's too late to come clean regarding your little game. You should have come clean from the moment there was any hint that existing members had sussed you out. Well it's your call, if you want to continue posting like some 'glorified Adam' character.  What I don't get is why the likes of Jane and RJ are going along with it as well.

Roch, I can honestly say I haven’t a clue who she/he is, I’m personally not bothered who they are, your entitled to post whichever way you want in my eyes.  You can ask NGB I haven’t a clue, I’ve heard suggestions but I’m not bothered about putting faces to anyone. I’ve not messaged CC, me and Jane made no plan to come back together, I think Jane spotted me back and then posted.  I think it’s becoming very very childish, I don’t post on Red or look at it, if I wanted to it’s no one’s business.  I’m trying to study the Bews Saga after doing a cycle this morning and I can see it’s a waste of time with yours and QC  stupid  posting again.

[Roch]

Well RJ, since there was no response to Bill's last post, I assumed it was done and dusted. Like Jackie said, you could hear a pin drop. I will have another look, as I do not know what I have posted on there. As for CC I take your point. You are absolved in my eyes regarding that.

[guest29835]

Roch, I can honestly say I haven’t a clue who she/he is, I’m personally not bothered who they are, your entitled to post whichever way you want in my eyes.  You can ask NGB I haven’t a clue, I’ve heard suggestions but I’m not bothered about putting faces to anyone. I’ve not messaged CC, me and Jane made no plan to come back together, I think Jane spotted me back and then posted.  I think it’s becoming very very childish, I don’t post on Red or look at it, if I wanted to it’s no one’s business.  I’m trying to study the Bews Saga after doing a cycle this morning and I can see it’s a waste of time with yours and QC  stupid  posting again.

I agree it's no-one's business who posts what and for what reason, but my reaction to these posts is down to Cambridgecutie's almost satirical persona.  You can't really expect me to take any of this seriously?  Come on.

If I didn't know any better, somebody is having a laugh with us.

[guest7363]

Well RJ, since there was no response to Bill's last post, I assumed it was done and dusted. Like Jackie said, you could hear a pin drop. I will have another look, as I do not know what I have posted on there. As for CC I take your point. You are absolved in my eyes regarding that.

Roch, I don’t go on Red and I don’t read it, I have in the past but I’m not bothered who’s on who’s side, I find it a challenge either way.  You yourself said yesterday how well the forum was going.  Look on CC as a challenge.  I don’t want to bring Bill into it again personally Roch, I said my point and it was mainly about posting Fact or opinion which is a big difference.  I think Bill clarified it with a post not long after and I respect that, I shouldn’t have said what I did, but credit to Bill he  never gets angry or cross with anyone and he has my respect for that.

[guest7363]

Well RJ, since there was no response to Bill's last post, I assumed it was done and dusted. Like Jackie said, you could hear a pin drop. I will have another look, as I do not know what I have posted on there. As for CC I take your point. You are absolved in my eyes regarding that.

Sorry I didn’t see Bill’s last post, to be honest the whole clock saga gets rather confusing, clocks fast clocks slow, did they record it when it was first reported or did they record times when they finished writing, it’s something no one will ever prove.  It was an era of Approx times with everything not like nowadays.