« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 38   Go Down

Author Topic: Louis Theroux  (Read 40156 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #30 on: September 18, 2021, 07:00:PM »
Quote from: JackieD on September 15, 2021, 08:25:AM
Thank you Gringo. You have made everything very clear. It’s seems these type of documentary/drama series are now coming on a regular basis. There is still obviously a lot of interest in the case however much the guilty camp deny this.

Let’s keep the Jeremy Bamber case in the news because there will be a documentary maker that will approach the case from another angle

I believe in the saying no news is bad news

After the Carol Ann Lee hatchet job I spoke to numerous people who were mystified at how Jeremy Bamber was ever found guilty looking at the content in the drama.

The truth about the relatives, Julie Mugford and Essex Police will come out.

There will be documentary makers chomping at the bit to show the truth if the latest documentary is rubbish.

It is after all the greatest miscarriage of justice in British Justice

The problem for any documentary maker is that JBs official campaign team are putting out crazy ideas that no reasonable documentary maker will entertain. The CT then cut ties with anyone not singing to their tune.

Thus any documentary maker is only going to be left with only pro guilt outlets to go by.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2021, 07:01:PM by David1819 »
Logged

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #31 on: September 18, 2021, 08:17:PM »
Logged

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #32 on: September 18, 2021, 08:42:PM »
Logged
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #33 on: September 18, 2021, 08:45:PM »
Quote from: JackieD on September 18, 2021, 08:42:PM

It was because of the way Mark Williams Thomas was treated by the campaign he decided not to do a series of documentary’s on the case

Why cant he do one without them? He can get plenty of information from this forum
Logged

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #34 on: September 19, 2021, 09:57:AM »
Quote from: David1819 on September 18, 2021, 08:45:PM
Why cant he do one without them? He can get plenty of information from this forum

There has been major problems in the past with professional people give free help and advice. Unless these professional people can work without interference I cannot see Jeremy getting free help in the future

One of the criticism of the MWT documentary was it didn’t show a bias to Jeremy. MWT has you know wanted to do further documentaries but will not be dictated to by the campaign team

That is why I would love to see Piers Morgan work on the case as I can’t see him taking instructions from anyone
Logged
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #35 on: September 19, 2021, 01:08:PM »
It's a thousand pities that the programme " Rough Justice " fizzled out. That would have sorted the wheat from the chaff and shown everyone up for the sort of people they all were.
Logged

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #36 on: September 19, 2021, 01:28:PM »
Piers Morgan won't get involved in the Bamber case. He's much too big a star & has lots of better options than latching onto a man who has been in prison for 36 years.
Logged
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #37 on: September 19, 2021, 01:28:PM »
Quote from: lookout on September 19, 2021, 01:08:PM
It's a thousand pities that the programme " Rough Justice " fizzled out. That would have sorted the wheat from the chaff and shown everyone up for the sort of people they all were.


Why was that scrapped ?
Logged
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #38 on: September 19, 2021, 02:39:PM »
Quote from: JackieD on September 19, 2021, 01:28:PM

Why was that scrapped ?




No idea Jackie.
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #39 on: September 19, 2021, 02:40:PM »
Maybe it proved that there were too many cock-ups  in the justice system ?
Logged

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #40 on: September 19, 2021, 05:29:PM »
Logged

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #41 on: September 19, 2021, 08:28:PM »
Just watching the Rough Justice video now and saw a well known saying which had been posted by someone------" Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely " How very true that is.
Logged

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #42 on: September 19, 2021, 10:05:PM »
Quote from: David1819 on September 19, 2021, 05:29:PM
This might explain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6tDARIM8dI
In addition to the above I would say that Trial and Error, which was really the successor to Rough Justice examined a couple of dubious cases after Simon Hall, notably Eddie Gilfoyle and Sheila Bowler, which finished the series off.
Logged

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #43 on: September 20, 2021, 06:53:PM »
Quote from: Steve_uk on September 19, 2021, 10:05:PM
In addition to the above I would say that Trial and Error, which was really the successor to Rough Justice examined a couple of dubious cases after Simon Hall, notably Eddie Gilfoyle and Sheila Bowler, which finished the series off.

Simon Hall done a lot of damage to genuine claims of miscarriages of justice.
Logged

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #44 on: September 20, 2021, 07:04:PM »
Quote from: David1819 on September 20, 2021, 06:53:PM
Simon Hall done a lot of damage to genuine claims of miscarriages of justice.
Yes I agree, there was posters on here totally gone with him even though he confessed they wouldn’t accept it. 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 38   Go Up
« previous next »