Author Topic: Louis Theroux  (Read 40162 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2021, 09:47:AM »
She’s disgusting Roch, QC says it’s a shame they don’t Post on here, I think they have got more sense and this is the answer.

Your disgusting for your support of the family that lied to put an innocent man in prison. You should be ashamed of yourself

Course AA is truthful. She had sex with Jeremy in a Cat A prison. You couldn’t make it up
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2021, 10:13:AM »
She’s disgusting Roch, QC says it’s a shame they don’t Post on here, I think they have got more sense and this is the answer.

And just remember when you play on your ‘friendship’ with Ngb that has done work and advised Jeremy, believes the conviction is unsafe because of numerous reasons but including the relatives part in Jeremys stitch up.

So laughable you trust what AA says just like you believe the relatives
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2021, 10:33:AM »
And just remember when you play on your ‘friendship’ with Ngb that has done work and advised Jeremy, believes the conviction is unsafe because of numerous reasons but including the relatives part in Jeremys stitch up.

So laughable you trust what AA says just like you believe the relatives
No, it’s about respecting other posters point of view irrespective of what they believe without such vile  attacks from you.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2021, 10:39:AM »
Jackie, please, I urge you to moderate your recent posts, remove name and remove a certain remark. It's up to you whether you do.

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2021, 11:04:AM »
I have edited a post here to remove confidential information.  Save in very exceptional circumstances it is not acceptable to post PMs on the open forum.


Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #20 on: September 13, 2021, 11:34:AM »
Ah well, at least I know AA is a " real " person, having spoken to her a few times. :)

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #21 on: September 13, 2021, 11:54:AM »
Jackie, please, I urge you to moderate your recent posts, remove name and remove a certain remark. It's up to you whether you do.

To be quite honest I am sick to death of people going on here telling lies, not authentic or making out they are not friends with the relatives or Mugford.
How long did it take everyone to realise that Matt was a troll ???
Unbelievable

David I have sent you some of the information by pm you asked for but not all. As you can imagine it’s highly confidential and involves a documentary maker.
It’s a shame I can’t post it here but as everything goes back to the relatives. You know
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #22 on: September 13, 2021, 11:56:AM »
Where was the moderation when I was getting sent threatening messages from Matt ?

Silent

Where was the moderation when Matt was making up false posts I was meant to have made

Silent
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #23 on: September 13, 2021, 12:37:PM »
To be quite honest I am sick to death of people going on here telling lies, not authentic or making out they are not friends with the relatives or Mugford.
How long did it take everyone to realise that Matt was a troll ???
Unbelievable

David I have sent you some of the information by pm you asked for but not all. As you can imagine it’s highly confidential and involves a documentary maker.
It’s a shame I can’t post it here but as everything goes back to the relatives. You know

Ok Thank you

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #24 on: September 13, 2021, 01:08:PM »
Where was the moderation when I was getting sent threatening messages from Matt ?

Silent

Where was the moderation when Matt was making up false posts I was meant to have made

Silent




That was a truly despicable poster !

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #25 on: September 13, 2021, 02:14:PM »



That was a truly despicable poster !


The truth hurts
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #26 on: September 13, 2021, 02:18:PM »



That was a truly despicable poster !

He was allowed on this forum years two long with the sole aim of closing down this forum
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2021, 11:12:PM »
Also on the Sky documentaries slate, part of a wider unveiling of 125 original series, films and docs, is the first project from Louis Theroux’s Mindhouse Productions that won’t feature the cult documentarian in front of the camera.

The Bambers: Murder at the Farm (working title) examines the tragic murder of a family at a secluded English farmhouse in 1985. The three-part true-crime series uses first-hand testimony and unseen archive footage to reflect on the events and the conviction of Jeremy Bamber, who was brother to murdered mother Sheila Caffell.

Theroux, who executive produces alongside Arron Fellows, said: “A big part of wanting to start a production company a little over a year ago was to make programs that I don’t appear in… It’s a story that’s socially important, with a powerfully compelling narrative, and the intention is to tell it in a way that is both sensitive and creatively ambitious.”
    It will be the usual hatchet job, Jackie. From the Bamber blog spot on 30th April earlier this year- copy pasted below;
  When Mindhouse contacted us with a view to making a documentary on the evidence of Jeremy's innocence, we were obviously interested.



Having done some brief preliminary work with them on a potential project, we were then advised by industry contacts that Mindhouse had somehow obtained crime scene photographs of the bodies of the deceased at the scene, which we understood were to be used unethically on screen in their series.  Information we received also made clear that the programme would not be about the case evidence proving Jeremy’s innocence, and that it would have a very different nature to that presented to us by Mindhouse.

 

Police officers have disseminated distressing photographs of the deceased Bamber family to third parties, when they had no authority to do so, and the unauthorised distribution of these photographs was and still is, the subject of a criminal investigation. This placed us in a very difficult position in pursuing a criminal complaint, while at the same time, potentially working with those who had received illegally distributed images.

 

Mindhouse never gave us a satisfactory response to this, or to other serious concerns we had, and as a result, we terminated our involvement with them on the 20th of November 2020.

 

Mindhouse were not privy to the 10th of March 2021 submissions to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), and any attempt by the programme makers to suggest they are working with the campaign, Jeremy Bamber, his legal team, or the CCRC is wholly inaccurate.

 

 

 

Posted 30th April by Jeremy Bamber

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #29 on: September 15, 2021, 08:25:AM »
Thank you Gringo. You have made everything very clear. It’s seems these type of documentary/drama series are now coming on a regular basis. There is still obviously a lot of interest in the case however much the guilty camp deny this.

Let’s keep the Jeremy Bamber case in the news because there will be a documentary maker that will approach the case from another angle

I believe in the saying no news is bad news

After the Carol Ann Lee hatchet job I spoke to numerous people who were mystified at how Jeremy Bamber was ever found guilty looking at the content in the drama.

The truth about the relatives, Julie Mugford and Essex Police will come out.

There will be documentary makers chomping at the bit to show the truth if the latest documentary is rubbish.

It is after all the greatest miscarriage of justice in British Justice

Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000