Police only option to get Julie to commit massive perjury:

[Steve_uk]

After her friend contacted police to say she had been withholding information and Stan Jones collected her and took her back to the police station she was at some point (I do not no exactly when but it was at the police station) arrested and held in custody.  She was interviewed at length under caution and the notes of these interviews have never been released.

How do you know this? Being arrested and interviewed under caution are two separate things anyway: if you're arrested don't the police have a time limit in which to charge you, but interviewed under caution means you are free to leave the interview at any time and may have access to legal advice?

[Adam]

After her friend contacted police to say she had been withholding information and Stan Jones collected her and took her back to the police station she was at some point (I do not no exactly when but it was at the police station) arrested and held in custody.  She was interviewed at length under caution and the notes of these interviews have never been released.

Is it regular practice that interview notes of a witness should be released?

Next people will be wanting to see her draft WS's.

[Steve_uk]

Maxine Carr got 21 months in prison.

I believe she assisted Huntley in disposing the bodies and removing evidence. As well as refusing to admit to any involvement for a long time even after the police started questioning her.

I don't think this is true.

[JackieD]

How do you know this? Being arrested and interviewed under caution are two separate things anyway: if you're arrested don't the police have a time limit in which to charge you, but interviewed under caution means you are free to leave the interview at any time and may have access to legal advice?

Are you really suggesting you know more about the law than a criminal barrister?

[Steve_uk]

Are you really suggesting you know more about the law than a criminal barrister?

No but I would like clarification. I do know more about every aspect of this case under the sun than yourself, by the way.

[David1819]

After her friend contacted police to say she had been withholding information and Stan Jones collected her and took her back to the police station she was at some point (I do not no exactly when but it was at the police station) arrested and held in custody.  She was interviewed at length under caution and the notes of these interviews have never been released.

So she never actually went to the police voluntarily?

[Adam]

Before approaching the police, Julie may have been worried that Bamber would confess & then say he confided in her.

Or he gets arrested & charged. Resulting in a long trial & the police interviewing her. 

Best she made the first move. If it was not enough to get Bamber arrested, at least she was honest.

[Rob_]

Is it regular practice that interview notes of a witness should be released?

Next people will be wanting to see her draft WS's.

Something I find strange is that she keeps changing the time JB called her on the morning, first it is 3.30 in the first WS then 3.00 then back to 3.30?

[JackieD]

No but I would like clarification. I do know more about every aspect of this case under the sun than yourself, by the way.

You clearly don’t or you wouldn’t be defending Mugford.

Everyone on here knows you are not impartial. If you really believe Mugfords role in this conviction why don’t you fight to have all Mugfords withheld statements released

[Adam]

You clearly don’t or you wouldn’t be defending Mugford.

Everyone on here knows you are not impartial. If you really believe Mugfords role in this conviction why don’t you fight to have all Mugfords withheld statements released

Her draft WS's would have been binned in 1985.

Why keep them?

[Adam]

Something I find strange is that she keeps changing the time JB called her on the morning, first it is 3.30 in the first WS then 3.00 then back to 3.30?

Ditto Bamber. Have you read his police interviews?

Believe she said one time. One of her flatmates was sure it was another.

[JackieD]

Her draft WS's would have been binned in 1985.

Why keep them?

Are you serious ??

[Adam]

Are you serious ??

Why keep 36 year old draft WS's?

Why keep them at all?

[ngb1066]

Why keep 36 year old draft WS's?

Why keep them at all?

They were not draft witness statements, they were notes of very lengthy interviews. 

[JackieD]

Why keep 36 year old draft WS's?

Why keep them at all?

Out of all the most ridiculous and embarrassing posts you have made over the years this has to be the worst

Since Jeremy has been convicted he has been appealing the decision

So you believe anyone appealing against their sentence should have any evidence withheld destroyed

Crawl back under that stone you came from