Massacre & caravan robbery. How they relate.

[Adam]

What forensic evidence, Adam ?

Do you have difficulty remembering things?

[Adam]

It looks like Rob is not going to do a Sheila scenario. Which is disappointing.

The crime scene evidence is not disputed by either side. So a scenario should fit it like a glove. At least it does with Bamber.

[Adam]

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,4108.0.html

The minor cheque book fraud with Susan Battersby was in 1984. So between 8-20 months before the massacre.

So really nothing to do with the massacre. But desperate times call for desperate measures.

It would be good to know the exact date of the minor cheque book fraud.

If it was early 1984, it is very surprising that it was brought up at the 1986 trial. Up to 18 months/3 years after Julie/SB committed the fraud. 

Maybe NGB can enlighten us more.

[Rob_]

What did the police do that was not police protocol at the time?

The forensic evidence was submitted by independent experts.

I expect the highest levels of honesty and integrity from a police officer, it's up to the jury to decide on a case with all the facts not the evidence the police wants them to see.

[lookout]

Do you have difficulty remembering things?

Not at all, but it would seem that you do.

[lookout]

Wasn't it Stan Jones who'd said " we've nothing on him ?" This would include evidence as well as forensic.

[Adam]

Not at all, but it would seem that you do.

I have posted it for you 5-10 times before.

[lookout]

I have posted it for you 5-10 times before.

All you post is gobble-de-gook. You're programmed like a zombie.