THE SILENCER SAGA

[killingeve]

They weren't looking very hard then, were they.  I hope the defence asked for a refund.

Weren't they?

[guest29835]

Weren't they?

No, they weren't.

I think you should discipline them, Cambridgecutie.

It's time for the pretence to end.  You should put on your leathers, get out your whip, and administer some good old-fashioned discipline!

[killingeve]

No, they weren't.

I think you should discipline them, Cambridgecutie.

It's time for the pretence to end.  You should put on your leathers, get out your whip, and administer some good old-fashioned discipline!

 

[Rob_]

I suppose her WS was watertight. Desperate times....

I just hope if ever a witness, in cross examination my apple stealing on my uncles allotment when I was 9 isn't brought up.

Watertight WS?? but where did the information in her WS come from?? SC on the bed maybe AE?

Stealing a apple I would not worry about that, but going to bed with a mass killer including two children?? Very few women would do that would they?? 

[Rob_]

No, they weren't.

I think you should discipline them, Cambridgecutie.

It's time for the pretence to end.  You should put on your leathers, get out your whip, and administer some good old-fashioned discipline!

I think Cc needs someone to practice on first QC 

[guest29835]

I think Cc needs someone to practice on first QC 

[Bubo bubo]

You have no evidence for this just your interpretation of sloppy paperwork.

Maybe you need to be clearer then?  Is it yourself or David1819 and myself?

If you can't see the flaws in the above then really there's no hope for you. 

The errors have been explained by the authorities but the supporters just refuse to accept them.

I do have evidence. All the DB items 1- 7 were collected on the day but then he takes another soil sample a month later and another a little later still according to his pocket book and what he told the COLP.

[Adam]

Watertight WS?? but where did the information in her WS come from?? SC on the bed maybe AE?

Stealing a apple I would not worry about that, but going to bed with a mass killer including two children?? Very few women would do that would they??

Yes there was a lot of information Julie could have only got from Bamber.

Both the police & relatives are ruled out in giving her this info -

The police would not give her info & then tell her to bring up MM.

The relatives would not give her info (if they had any), as she was Bamber's girlfriend.

[Adam]

The defence at trial claimed Julie got all the information from the following days papers.

However the information was much too  wide ranging & detailed for journalists to find out in a few hours.

The press would not bother putting any of it in the following days papers anyway. It would be all about Sheila the crazy model.

[Rob_]

Yes there was a lot of information Julie could have only got from Bamber.

Both the police & relatives are ruled out in giving her this info -

The police would not give her info & then tell her to bring up MM.

The relatives would not give her info (if they had any), as she was Bamber's girlfriend.

So are you saying SC was originally on the bed when the armed police went into the house? Why was she moved onto the floor?

[Adam]

Low house insurance.

Bible by Sheila.

Sheila's shot locations.

Kitchen fight.

Twins asleep.

Sheila putting up no resistance.

Nevill's multiple shots.

June shot in bed.

Kitchen windows.

Portable phone.

Meissen clock.

Twins shot first.

Sheila shot last.

June's sleeping pills.

Sheila & the twins sleeping in different rooms on different nights.

Kitchen argument.

Shooting rabbits.

Sheila shot on parents bed.

Matthew Macdonald

----------

Obviously Julie only got this information from Bamber.

[Rob_]

Not sure if that answers the question Adam, JM said SC was on the bed, so if this came from JB then the police moved her to the bedroom floor for some reason?

[Adam]

Not sure if that answers the question Adam, JM said SC was on the bed, so if this came from JB then the police moved her to the bedroom floor for some reason?

Bamber probably said 'by' or 'next to' the bed. Julie remembered it as 'on'.

Or Bamber did say 'on' in error.

Very minor detail considering Julie's WS was 24 pages & gave so much information. 

[David1819]

1 The fact that the silencer was swapped to a soil sample

That is not a fact.

[killingeve]

I do have evidence. All the DB items 1- 7 were collected on the day but then he takes another soil sample a month later and another a little later still according to his pocket book and what he told the COLP.

Which day?