Why would Julie bring up Matthew McDonald?

[Adam]

Just re read replies 1, 4, 6, 8, 12, 13 & 14.

None give any explanation why Julie would bring up MM if she was trying to frame an innocent Bamber.

Reply 9 does give a reason ' it was the first person that came into her head'. Although she was trying to frame Bamber!

[Adam]

Other threads give reasons why Bamber would use a proxy. As well as why that proxy would be MM.

It has to be concluded that MM was in Julie's WS because Bamber told her he had committed the massacre for money.

I don't agree with QC that he may have been kidding her. He wouldn't spend 18 months doing that.

[lookout]

At least JB had a sense of humour which is more than you've got. JB and his dad used to have a whale of a time when they were together as both had the same  sense of humour. JM had latched on to this and was used to JB being a joker-----until it suited her otherwise. What he'd said in joke form she twisted to suit the agenda because of her ulterior motive, MONEY !

[Adam]

At least JB had a sense of humour which is more than you've got. JB and his dad used to have a whale of a time when they were together as both had the same  sense of humour. JM had latched on to this and was used to JB being a joker-----until it suited her otherwise. What he'd said in joke form she twisted to suit the agenda because of her ulterior motive, MONEY !

Do you think Julie's WS is correct. But everything Bamber told her was in jest?

[lookout]

Do you think Julie's WS is correct. But everything Bamber told her was in jest?

Of course he was kidding her. It wasn't he who had anything to hide.

[Adam]

Of course he was kidding her. It wasn't he who had anything to hide.

So you believe Julie's WS covering her 18 months with Bamber is true.

[lookout]

So you believe Julie's WS covering her 18 months with Bamber is true.

I've only read the bits that aren't, the rest is typical of a schoolgirl's rantings after a split.

[guest29835]

Other threads give reasons why Bamber would use a proxy. As well as why that proxy would be MM.

It has to be concluded that MM was in Julie's WS because Bamber told her he had committed the massacre for money.

I don't agree with QC that he may have been kidding her. He wouldn't spend 18 months doing that.

Why not? 

[Adam]

Why not?

18 months kidding her about plans to massacre his family. Then telling her he was involved & hired MM.

His kidding her included a lot of detailed information.

Do you believe Julie's 24 page WS could be correct but he was kidding her?

[lookout]

Normally JM would have ignored his witterings, as maybe he was waiting for some kind of a reaction from her for having said these things----if he said them at all !

[lookout]

The pair of then appeared to have been very immature at the time. Unlike your average 20 odd year old.

[Rob_]

18 months kidding her about plans to massacre his family. Then telling her he was involved & hired MM.

His kidding her included a lot of detailed information.

Do you believe Julie's 24 page WS could be correct but he was kidding her?

Sorry but I don't believe a single word of a woman who would knowingly sleep with the killer of two young children, nothing she says or writes can be trusted. Did the jury know she had 32 interviews with the police??

[Adam]

Sorry but I don't believe a single word of a woman who would knowingly sleep with the killer of two young children, nothing she says or writes can be trusted. Did the jury know she had 32 interviews with the police??

Have you read Bamber's interviews? They are online.

Doubt it was 32. She would have met the police several times while compiling her WS.

Why would Julie bring up MM if she was trying to frame an innocent Bamber?

[Rob_]

Have you read Bamber's interviews? They are online.

Doubt it was 32. She would have met the police several times while compiling her WS.

Why would Julie bring up MM if she was trying to frame an innocent Bamber?

No I have not read the Bamber interviews I am new to the case so have a lot of catching up to do.

[Adam]

No I have not read the Bamber interviews I am new to the case so have a lot of catching up to do.

Bamber was evasive from the start.

Over 30 'No comments' & 'can't remembers'. Over 10 -don't knows' & 'can't say'.

Several one word answers as well as vague answers such as 'not really', 'I think so'  & 'less than 40 but more than 10 !'