The Official Jeremy Bamber and White House Farm Podcast Series - Season 1

[David1819]

Also for the record. It has been four years since the CT came up with this idea.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8578.0.html

To make matters worse. The Campaign Team also claim that an event log sheet shows Sheila was "in a conversation" with the police outside. If that was the case why would she then need to contact them via telephone in the first place? lol

[David1819]

Depends on how much credence you give the content of the podcasts. They suggest evidence exists to underpin the claims made. But like you said yourself, would the evidence stand up to critical scrutiny? Ambiguity in interpretation has not been a good servant for the defence cause so far.

I have only listened to four minutes worth of the podcasts. There are now 35 podcasts. Talk about quantity over quality.

Furthermore "evidence" has been made public before, such as -

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg456440.html#msg456440

[Roch]

I have only listened to four minutes worth of the podcasts. There are now 35 podcasts. Talk about quantity over quality.

Furthermore "evidence" has been made public before, such as -

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,10006.msg456440.html#msg456440

I think your attitude towards the podcasts is self defeating. But it's your choice to only listen to four minutes. They're quite varied.

[Steve_uk]

I think your attitude towards the podcasts is self defeating. But it's your choice to only listen to four minutes. They're quite varied.

For them the last one was mercifully mild.

[Roch]

To make matters worse. The Campaign Team also claim that an event log sheet shows Sheila was "in a conversation" with the police outside. If that was the case why would she then need to contact them via telephone in the first place? lol

Why wouldn't she? It's not like the officers outside provided her with a mobile number or a walkie-talkie.

[David1819]

Why wouldn't she? It's not like the officers outside provided her with a mobile number or a walkie-talkie.

Why would you call the police when they are literally outside on your front lawn? 

According to CTs (incorrect) interpretation of the message log. Sheila was already having a conversation with the officers outside.

[Roch]

Why would you call the police when they are literally outside on your front lawn? 

According to CTs (incorrect) interpretation of the message log. Sheila was already having a conversation with the officers outside.

How do you know she was in the mood for shouting by 6.09am?  Re the earlier log entry.. how can you know for certain that the interpretation is incorrect?  You can certainly suggest it is incorrect but you cannot know that it is.

[Adam]

Why would you call the police when they are literally outside on your front lawn? 

According to CTs (incorrect) interpretation of the message log. Sheila was already having a conversation with the officers outside.

CT keeping their options open.

Sheila having conversations with outside police officers together with phoning 999.

New evidence showing Bamber is innocent, together with withheld evidence which would prove his innocence.

[David1819]

How do you know she was in the mood for shouting by 6.09am?  Re the earlier log entry.. how can you know for certain that the interpretation is incorrect?  You can certainly suggest it is incorrect but you cannot know that it is.

I know its incorrect because, when you read further down the log it states nobody responded to the attempts to communicate.

Moreover if such event took place, all the police and everyone outside (including Jeremy) would have noticed and he would never have been convicted in the first place.

[Roch]

I know its incorrect because, when you read further down the log it states nobody responded to the attempts to communicate.

Moreover if such event took place, all the police and everyone outside (including Jeremy) would have noticed and he would never have been convicted in the first place.

Check the time between both entries. Moreover, Jeremy was given the impression that there were people alive within the farmhouse. This is the reason why, when first told everyone was dead, his immediate response was to exclaim that the TFG must have shot everyone.

[David1819]

Check the time between both entries. Moreover, Jeremy was given the impression that there were people alive within the farmhouse. This is the reason why, when first told everyone was dead, his immediate response was to exclaim that the TFG must have shot everyone.

No. The police simply told him "everything will be alright" in order to calm him down. That is why he accused he TFG of shooting.

[Roch]

No. The police simply told him "everything will be alright" in order to calm him down. That is why he accused he TFG of shooting.

Not so. The police behaved like there were people still alive inside the house. In the build up and during the raid.

[David1819]

Not so. The police behaved like there were people still alive inside the house. In the build up and during the raid.

Because they had no way of knowing if they were dead or alive.

[Roch]

Because they had no way of knowing if they were dead or alive.

In which case, neither would JB. He would therefore not have accused police of having shot his family members - as he would have been aware of the possibility, that a silent house with no signs of life might indicate the very worst case scenario.

[David1819]

In which case, neither would JB. He would therefore not have accused police of having shot his family members - as he would have been aware of the possibility, that a silent house with no signs of life might indicate the very worst case scenario.

What has this got to do with the subject? I thought you didn't believe Sheila rang 999 for an ambulance?