The Official Jeremy Bamber and White House Farm Podcast Series - Season 1

[Roch]

Even the description text is wrong. The Jury never asked if AE had motive to lie, only RWB.

I expect that they want to encourage average Joe to consider the relatives as a deceitful group. The jury's question was put to RWB. He represented the relatives, arguably. It was his wife who benefited and therefore it's likely his offspring benefitted via her. Ann is one of those offspring.   

[Roch]

These podcasts are intended for the general public who know little about the case.

I have gone over about 15,000 pages of case related documents. All of them at least twice, and some documents I consider crucial I re-read over half a dozen times. There is not really much more I need to know.

Yes but it would seem those documents are only part of the case evidence. And the other part may contain different information (that was deemed unhelpful in the prosecution of Jeremy Bamber,).

[David1819]

Yes but it would seem those documents are only part of the case evidence. And the other part may contain different information (that was deemed unhelpful in the prosecution of Jeremy Bamber,).

The only key evidence I have not seen is Julie Mugfords PII and police questioning etc. And I don't really need to see that to work out she was full of BS.

Half of what the CT ask to be disclosed simply never existed in the first place and the other half has been destroyed. such as Sheila's diaries.

[Roch]

The only key evidence I have not seen is Julie Mugfords PII and police questioning etc. And I don't really need to see that to work out she was full of BS.

Half of what the CT ask to be disclosed simply never existed in the first place and the other half has been destroyed. such as Sheila's diaries.

Ok. What about the other half of what they asked to be disclosed, that does exist? Also, did you work through the PII schedule under Ewen Smith's tenure? It's on here.

[lookout]

These podcasts are intended for the general public who know little about the case.

I have gone over about 15,000 pages of case related documents. All of them at least twice, and some documents I consider crucial I re-read over half a dozen times. There is not really much more I need to know.

What you need to know David, is the truth ,and it's that which has been hidden so I reckon that there's plenty more  yet that you need to know.

[Adam]

30 according to the podcast, inclusive of new evidence.

It is good that the CT can come up with new information 36 years later.

[lookout]

It is good that the CT can come up with new information 36 years later.

It wasn't around during previous appeals ! PII, remember.

[Adam]

These podcasts are intended for the general public who know little about the case.

I have gone over about 15,000 pages of case related documents. All of them at least twice, and some documents I consider crucial I re-read over half a dozen times. There is not really much more I need to know.

Have you not made any further breakthroughs since 2016? 

[lookout]

Much of this information has only come about in recent years.

[David1819]

Ok. What about the other half of what they asked to be disclosed, that does exist? Also, did you work through the PII schedule under Ewen Smith's tenure? It's on here.

What did exist has been destroyed. As for PII JB has all those. What ever is there is not going to change to my view on what happened.

[Roch]

What did exist has been destroyed. As for PII JB has all those. What ever is there is not going to change to my view on what happened.

I would like to summarize your view.

[David1819]

I would like to summarize your view.

Consider this, the only PII stuff the CT have shown, is a note stating JB was on the phone at around 3.37AM. This was no secret anyway as JB was on the phone for around 10-15 minutes. If that's all they have worth showing then I wont get my hopes up.

The claim that there is a WS from Mrs Boutflour stating RWB never told her that JB told him he could murder his family, (which is a rather stunning thing not to tell your wife when the whole family ends up dead). Is interesting. However -

I expect the conspiracy theorists looking for a police conspiracy will be rather disappointed once the PII stuff is looked at critically.

If you want a summary of my view of what happened in 1985/86, that will take a while to type up.

[Adam]

Consider this, the only PII stuff the CT have shown, is a note stating JB was on the phone at around 3.37AM. This was no secret anyway as JB was on the phone for around 10-15 minutes. If that's all they have worth showing then I wont get my hopes up.

The claim that there is a WS from Mrs Boutflour stating RWB never told her that JB told him he could murder his family, (which is a rather stunning thing not to tell your wife when the whole family ends up dead). Is interesting. However -

I expect the conspiracy theorists looking for a police conspiracy will be rather disappointed once the PII stuff is looked at critically.

If you want a summary of my view of what happened in 1985/86, that will take a while to type up.

'The claim that there is a WS from Mrs Boutflour stating RWB never told her that JB told him he could murder his family, (which is a rather stunning thing not to tell your wife when the whole family ends up dead). Is interesting.'

----------

No big deal. He either forgot or did not want to tell his wife something so distasteful. RB would have thought Bamber was not serious anyway.

As you said, there is a 'claim' of a WS.

[Roch]

Consider this, the only PII stuff the CT have shown, is a note stating JB was on the phone at around 3.37AM. This was no secret anyway as JB was on the phone for around 10-15 minutes. If that's all they have worth showing then I wont get my hopes up.

The claim that there is a WS from Mrs Boutflour stating RWB never told her that JB told him he could murder his family, (which is a rather stunning thing not to tell your wife when the whole family ends up dead). Is interesting. However -

I expect the conspiracy theorists looking for a police conspiracy will be rather disappointed once the PII stuff is looked at critically.

If you want a summary of my view of what happened in 1985/86, that will take a while to type up.

I meant I would summarize your take on things. Just a bit of fun really. 

[guest29835]

Have you not made any further breakthroughs since 2016?

It's a difficult one for Adam because up to now he has maintained steadfastly that Jeremy is guilty.  Now that Adam knows the truth, he is understandably scared of making his stance change public.

That's why I am making myself available to Adam and others like him through the PM system where I can offer confidential moral support.