The Official Jeremy Bamber and White House Farm Podcast Series - Season 1

[guest29835]

Julie was smuggling drugs before she met Bamber? Was it to Columbia? She must have been a devious teenager. But Yvonne knows best.

Bamber said himself in the police interviews they spoke about marriage.

Need to see a source of 13 separate occasions. Yvonne will automatically say this as she supports Bamber.

Not sure how any of this negates to evidence.

Thanks Adam.  I believe Essex Police did capture it all on video, and some of the footage is below.  Devious Julie was hiding in the khazi while the deal was going down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lT8iKko4YQ

Thanks to Mike for finding this, but he's releasing it in stages.

[Adam]

So Julie was a teenager smuggling drugs to Miami. Was it Heroin or Cocaine?

Maybe she thought it was her drug baron ringing her at 3am.

Thanks Yvonne. And QC.

[guest29835]

So Julie was a teenager smuggling drugs to Miami. Was it Heroin or Cocaine?

Maybe she thought it was her drug baron ringing her at 3am.

Thanks Yvonne. And QC.

I know.  It all gets murkier.  I'll let you know if Mike releases any more footage.  Thanks Adam. 

[Adam]

I know.  It all gets murkier.  I'll let you know if Mike releases any more footage.  Thanks Adam.

With Mike, Yvonne and David's 2016 'Forensic Evidence Breakthrough' it will not be long until Jeremy is standing on the COA steps. Victorious.

[guest29835]

With Mike, Yvonne and David's 2016 'Forensic Evidence Breakthrough' it will not be long until Jeremy is standing on the COA steps. Victorious.

Thanks Adam.  I'm just relieved they've got you on board for the appeal.  I assume you'll be posting a new thread: 86 Reasons Why Jeremy Is Innocent.  I look forward to it.  I always thought there was something in your theory about Peggy and Pat from EastEnders.  I just wish people would take my Crispy theory more seriously.  As for Myster, he still won't let me join in at Cluedo.  Mister Board Game Supremo!

[JackieD]

I’m so pleased you, Adam and Steve are on the same team. Some of us take the case seriously

[guest29835]

I’m so pleased you, Adam and Steve are on the same team. Some of us take the case seriously

I joke and satirise for a very good reason.  It's because I can't take much of what is posted on this Forum seriously, quite frankly, and having a sense of humour helps keep me sane.  Laughter is a tonic, especially when reading some of Adam's posts.

You claim you take this case seriously, but with respect, you don't appear to do much to consider the case from all angles - which is what I would consider to be the hallmark of a serious person.  I acknowledge that you are accepting of my posts, but have you really thought about this case?

I think people who come on here to mislead or with one-eyed agendas deserve scorn and ridicule, especially when they come off as arrogant and put down other people.  I don't aim it at everybody who deserves it, because some people don't aim it at others in the first place, or just don't understand what they are doing ["Forgive them Father, for they know not what they do"].

[JackieD]

Of course I take the case seriously. We are talking about a person who is in prison on a full life tariff because the main prosecution witness is a pathological liar, nutcase and a thief and taking account of everyone of your very long posts you have not come close to reaching what I believe is the threshold of a guilty verdict. I personally asked Jeremy plenty of questions and didn’t hold back.

You have make your 98% guilty assumption knowing that the majority of Mugfords statements are witheld. There is no justice in this case even if Jeremy wins an appeal. The whole thing is an absolute disgrace and I feel sorry for every single member of the jury that was hoodwinked by our justice system.

I don’t know if Jeremy is guilty or not and nobody does but my odds on him being innocent are a lot higher than yours.

Have you ever bothered to speak to people Jeremy grew up or went to school with because I have

If have jokes with Adam floats your boat carry on but quite frankly I am bored reading it now

[guest29835]

See Adam, look what you've done.  I've fallen out with Jackie now.  I hope you're satisfied!  Thanks Adam.  You need to make up for it with another list of reasons Jeremy must have been set up by Julie, Robert Boutflour and Stan Jones.  I want to see it, Adam.  I need my daily Adam fix.

[Roch]

PV 20 has been given a whirl..

https://open.spotify.com/episode/2jbMRjtNQ4S93WtDWOv8px

[guest29835]

PV 20 has been given a whirl..

https://open.spotify.com/episode/2jbMRjtNQ4S93WtDWOv8px

I'm getting used to the simulated voice now.  It's like a female HAL 9000 has been roped in to help Jeremy.

It is an interesting podcast, raising lots of questions about Malcolm Fletcher and his evidence.  I personally believe the key to the case is the ballistic evidence.

[Roch]

I'm getting used to the simulated voice now.  It's like a female HAL 9000 has been roped in to help Jeremy.

It is an interesting podcast, raising lots of questions about Malcolm Fletcher and his evidence.  I personally believe the key to the case is the ballistic evidence.

Bill Robertson showed me how his trial testimony was ridiculous. I don't know how Fletcher came away unscathed from it.

[lookout]

All I can say is -------unbelievable. The lies, the spin and how the jury were hoodwinked by so-called professional people who were without doubt "all in it together ".

[Adam]

All I can say is -------unbelievable. The lies, the spin and how the jury were hoodwinked by so-called professional people who were without doubt "all in it together ".

The Industrial Frame.

[Roch]

hoodwinked by so-called professional people who were without doubt "all in it together ".

Think I would put it differently. Fletcher's evidence was probably suspect, so he may well have been towing the line, 'and some'. I think some of PV's evidence is suspect, so possibly a similar situation for him.  But I think police just knew every trick in the book.  How to handle professionals. When to get their point across and how to do it. I can't quite fathom Rivlin.  He seems to have done Jeremy a great disservice. As for the judge, he put away the Bridgewater Four and he was also the prosecutor against Ricky Tomlinson & co in the 70's. I think the police went in to the trial, plying all the tricks of the trade, with their fingers crossed, half believing the case against JB would collapse. Some of them must have felt elation at the conviction, purely because they managed to manipulate a winning result against the odds, after having pulled out all the stops to do so. It must have felt a bit like winning a tournament by cheating.