'SILENCERS GALORE' - 'SBJ/1',[('SJ/1'), 'DB/1',( 'AE/1'), ('HGO/1'), 'DRB/1'

[mike tesko]

There is much confusion around the silencer (Sound Moderator)  evidence..

Exactly, how many different ones existed which were physical exhibits, and in the possession of the police, fingerprinted, sent or taken to the Home Office Forensic Lab' at Huntingdon, and when key forensic evidence discovered on or inside one or other of these.

Well, there is/are certain undeniable facts that can be proved about it or them..

(1) At the beginning of the trial, an Essex police motor cycle outrider collected 'two Parker hale silencers from the relatives', and conveyed these to court, should the Crown be requested to explain all the contradictions and inconsistencies of the surrounding multiple exhibit references for the existence of only one silencer (' SBJ/1', 'SJ/1', 'DB/1', 'AE/1', 'HGO/1', and 'DRB/1'..

However..

(2) there was already one further Parker Hale silencer lodged with the court, and it had the exhibit reference, 'DRB/1'...

(3) three separate Parker hale silencers at court on the first day of the trial, 'two collected from relatives', and 'one' to which was being portrayed as 'home to blood group evidence', and 'red paint'. The exhibit references of the two Parker hale silencers in relatives possession up to the beginning of the trial 'did not have any exhibit references', or if they did, 'none were disclosed'...

This proves, 'relatives', 'cops', 'Lab' experts' had been dealing with 'at least three different Parker hale silencers', at 'one time' or 'another'. I can identify each of these 'three unique Parker hale silencers' with 'the original exhibit reference' given to each one..

'SBJ/1'

'DB/1'

'DRB/1'

One or other, of these three silencers was submitted to Huntingdon Lab', on three  different stages of the police investigation..



13th August 1985 'SBJ/1'

30th August 1985'DB/1'

20th September 1985 'DRB/1'


Each one of these 'three silencers' was present at 'Chelmsford Crown Court' on 'the first day of the trial' (2nd October 1986)

to be continued..

Each of these unique parker hale silencers, were recovered, seized, or found, at the crime scene on three separate occasions. It remains possible, that the original exhibit reference ('SBJ/1') may have just been allocated to the 'Brno' rifle belonging to Anthony Pargeter, on it's own (better explanation to follow on this point)

As follows:-

7th August 1985 'SBJ/1'

taken to Lab' by DI Cook on 13th August 1985

Involvement of DS Jones, DCI Jones, DI Cook and PC Bird..

Fingerprinted by DI Cook on 15th and 23rd August 1985

10th August 1985 'DB/1'

Involvement of David Boutflour, Robert Boutflour and Ann Eaton (suspected of being the parker hale silencer belonging to Anthony Pargeters .22 'Brno' bolt action rifle, probably used with his gun).The find of this parker hale silencer, fits snugly with David Boutflours later account that he found a parker hale silencer in two different positions inside the gun cupboard at whf.

Sent to Lab" on 30th August 1985
 Blood group tests carried out on blood found in/on baffle plates of this particular parker hale silencer, on the following dates, 12th September 1985, 13th September 1985  18th September 1985  and 19th September 1985 (prior to parker hale silencer 'DRB/1' had even yet been submitted to the lab's (20th September 1985), this establishes beyond doubt, that the blood group evidence was not/ could not have been found inside 'DRB/1', but rather that it was present in one of the other two parker hale silencers ('DB/1'), and later for the sake of simplicity and ease, attributed as though it was blood found inside 'DRB/1'..


11th September 1985 'DRB/1'

Involvement of David Boutflour, Ann Eaton, DC Oakey, DS Eastwood, and DS Davison


Handed to DC Okey by Ann Eaton on 11th September 1985, it originally been given exhibit reference 'AE/1', later altered to 'HGO/1', until it was subsequently sent to the Lab' on 20th September 1985. On 14th September 1985, DS Eastwood and DS Davison fingerprinted this particular parker Hale silencer, after which time, its exhibit reference was altered once more, and it became 'DRB/1'. It was first examined forensically at the Lab' on 25th September 1985. Crushed Red paint particles from the kitchen farmhouse aga, were subsequently identified as matching the paint to the aga, in tests which were conducted at the beginning of October 1985..

David Boutflour telephoned Essex police on 12th September 1985 to inform them that he had found the parker hale silencer ('DRB/1') belonging exclusively to the .22 semi-automatic 'Anshuzt' rifle.

It seems almost certain that the first parker hale silencer found in the gun cupboard on 10th August 1985, was the one belonging to Anthony Pargeters 'Brno' rifle which had 17 internalised baffle plates, upon which was subsequently found the crucial blood group evidence, used to convict Jeremy Bamber. At some point prior to 11th September 1985, it became known to themselves probably having been told by Anthony Pargeter himself that the police had got his 17 baffle plated parker hale silencer, and if police had only got one parker hale silencer in their possession, then there should have been a second parker hale silencer in the same gun cupboard back at the scene. It was only after David Boutflour found and recovered the second parker hale silencer at the scene by 11th September 1985 it was realised that the relatives had handed Pargeters parker hale silencer to cops. Hence why, when he telephoned police on 12th September 1985, he was able to specifically state that this second silencer belonged to the .22 semi-automatic 'Anshuzt' rifle...

sent to Lab' on 20th September 1985

[mike tesko]

Here are some references, which pinpoint how Essex police, and others falsified the blood and paint evidence as only relevant to a single silencer ('DRB/1') which at various stages had multiple other exhibit references linked or associated with /to it, in the form of exhibit references, 'SBJ/1', 'SJ/1', 'DB/1', 'AE/1', and 'HGO/1'

'SBJ/1' refers witness Stanley Brian Jones recovery of silencer from scene on 7th August 1985

'SJ/1' refers to witness Stan Jones handing over silencer ('SBJ/1') to DI Cook on 13th August 1985. Cook states he did not know DS Jones had the middle Christian name of 'Brian", and thus made an entry in his pocketbook that he had received the silencer from Stan Jones which did not have a signed exhibit label attached to it  so he referred to that silencer ('SBJ/1'), as 'SJ/1'...


'DB/1' refers to witness, David Boutflour, and the first of his finding of two different silencers, this one which he took possession of on 10th August 1985, as opposed to the second silencer ('DRB/1') that he recovered from the same gun cupboard at whf a month later, '11th September 1985'

'AE/1' refers to witness Ann Eaton

'HGO/1' refers to witness Hayden Godfrey Oakey


'DRB/1' refers to witness David Robert Boutflour


to be continued..

[mike tesko]

There is almost no doubt at all, that the two parker hale silencers which a police motorcycle outrider collected from the relatives and brought to the courthouse on the first morning of the trial (2nd October 1985), were two of the three different silencers which were discovered,  seized or found at the scene on 7th August 1985, and 10th August 1985. I think we can assume that the two silencers which relatives had possession of until the start of the trial, were indeed the one bearing the original exhibit reference 'SBJ/1', along with the second parker hale silencer 'DB/1', recovered, seized or found at the scene, on 7th August 1985, and 10th August 1985, or in other words, the one found by David Boutflour in the gun cupboard on 10th August 1985, was the silencer inside which the blood group evidence originated from, how could such an important item of evidence end up back in  the possession of the relatives? Whilst at the same time, police, and others were mischievously allocating it to the third parker hale silencer ('DRB/1'), simply because that particular silencer belonged to the .22 semi-automatic 'Anshuzt' rifle which became touted as the sole weapon to have fired any of the 25, 26  27 or 28 bullets during the shootings, somebody tampering with the batches of crime scene ammunition (bullets, as opposed to spent cartridge cases, and vice versa) to make it appear as though it was a one gun crime...

[mike tesko]

Even more disturbing, depending upon which description regarding the condition of each of these three different parker hale silencers  where one silencer was described as having a long shiny scratch along one side of the silencers outer metal casing  versus the grey coloured hair that was supposedly stuck  to a blob of dried blood on the end cap of one of the other silencers, could not be seen, or found attached to silencer 'DRB/1', because the distinctive shiny scratch along the side of one silencer, was not the same silencer to which a single strand of a grey hair had been stuck upon. It beggars belief, that such a distinctive shiny scratch mark was nowhere to be found, discovered or noted to be present anywhere at all on the outer surface of silencer 'DRB/1', or for that matter, what had really happened to the solitary strand of grey hair which had been stuck on one of the silencers end cap to a blob of drying, or dried blood..

[mike tesko]

Additionally, is it really so surprising that prior to the second silencer 'DB/1' being sent to the Lab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985, why the jaws of the 17 baffle plates, were facing in the opposite direction to the jaws of baffle plates received at the Lab' and examined on that date, and later...

With the dismantled silencer ('SJ/1') laid bare on a desktop at the time DI Cook took photographs of it, it is absolutely astonishing that he (Cook) was not the person who first saw all of the blood on 7 or 8 of the 17 baffle plates he was examining. So, after Cook had removed all 17 baffle plates from a parker hale silencer he had in his possession prior to him submitting 'it' ('DB/1') to the Lab' at Huntingdon on 30th August 1985 for 17 consecutive days, the parker hale silencer which David Boutflour had, found in the gun cupboard on 10th August 1985, which had been kept in storage at the Eaton premises until the afternoon of 12th August 1985, at which point Robert Boutflour had got in in the act, by attending Witham police station and informing the police that a silencer had been found at the scene which they should be taking an interest in. Later that evening DS Jones attended at the Eaton residence and collected silencer 'DB/1' from Peter Eaton. According to Jones he took it back to Witham police station and rather that place the item in secure storage, he says he put that silencer in a lockable drawer that only he had a key to it. On the following day (13th August 1985) DS Jones handed 'it' over to DI Cook, who took it along to Huntingdon Laboratory for Glynis Howard to inspect. In his pocket book identified this silencer by the exhibit reference by the identifying mark of 'SJ/1', although examination of a relevant Lab' examination record, it was booked in as exhibit 'SBJ/1'. There are grounds for believing that the lab's records have been doctored at a later stage as part of the plot to try and maintain the existence of one silencer. In any event, the silencer ('SJ/1' or 'SBJ/1') was returned back into DI Cooks possession and he returned back to Withham police station, but instead of placing this silencer in  secure storage, he has claimed that from then on until 30th August 1985, when it was sent to the Lab' how he had kept silencer 'SJ/1' or 'SBJ/1' in his coat pocket. What this means is that on the 14th September 1985 when Cook, DS Jones and DI Miller attended the farmhouse in company with Ann Eaton, that he had that silencer with him. Ann Eaton later recollected that Cook had said to her whilst they were examining the red painted aga surround and mantle shelf, that she was not supposed to have seen what the police had been doing there, and that if anyone asked, she was to tell them that police were simply there ar the scene taking measurements on the aga surround. By a strange coincidence this was also supposed to be the day that Ann Eaton brought police attention to the red painted aga and the fact that there was a scratch mark under the right hand side of kitchen mantelpiece...

[mike tesko]

What a coincidence, what with Ann Eaton drawing police attention to the red painted kitchen aga surround/ mantelpiece, which was scratched, and he (Cook) having got 'the silencer' in his pocket, presumably with particles of crushed red paint on the circumference of the silencers end cap, and yet further, that he should take a paint sample ('RWC/1') from an area where the scratch was present...

It beggars belief, that he should take such a paint sample at such a late stage, and ask Ann Eaton for an assurance that she would not tell anyone about she had seen the police doing in the region of the kitchen, on that occasion..

[mike tesko]

It beggars belief, that he should take such a paint sample at such a late stage, and ask Ann Eaton for an assurance that she would not tell anyone about she had seen the police doing in the region of the kitchen, on that occasion..

So, we are expected to accept and believe, and that on 14th August 1985, when DI Cook, DS Jones, PI Miller, and Ann Eaton went to whf, and in particular, to the kitchen to take measurements of the red painted aga surround and its mantelpiece shelf, (a)  that police had been unaware beforehand that the underside of the shelf had been damaged at all, or scratched. No crime scene photographs exist or were taken showing any of this damage, or scratch marks  existed to show that damage was present at the time the bodies had been discovered until the 14th September 1985, and when as it turns out, David Boutflour had three days earlier (11th September and 1985) found a second Parker hale silencer ('AE/1','HGO/1', 'DRB/1'), in the exact same gun cupboard where a month earlier (10th August 1985), he had found the 'other silencer'  ('DB/1'), and that Cook should take a paint sample ('RWC/1') from the underside of the mantelpiece near the then damaged aga, and whilst he had in his coat pocket the silencer with crushed red paint particles in the knurled end of the silencers end cap, a blob of blood or jam like substance with a solitary grey coloured  hair attached to it, lick it a shiny elongated scratch along the silencers outer casing, and also the first 5, 6, 7 or 8 internal baffle plates contaminated with blood group puzzling, and was innocently being carried by DI Cook in his jacket pocket?

Worse still, but the silencer in his pocket had also got blood inside the inverted screw threads of this particular silencer, which is rather puzzling/disturbing because it suggests in the strongest terms possible that this/that particular silencer ('DB/1') had been screwed onto the external screw thread of a bloodstained rifle barrel, and and that such a rifle could not have been the barrel end of the. 22 semi-automatic, '' Anshuzt' rifle, because to all intents and purposes the barrel of the Anshuzt rifle was examinedand declared to have been blood free!