Query re forum members

[lookout]

65

I'm not too surprised by that Hartley as your posts latterly , to me anyway, hinted at uncertainty as opposed to your posts initially. You can sense a change in some posters who were regulars.

[guest7363]

I'm not too surprised by that Hartley as your posts latterly , to me anyway, hinted at uncertainty as opposed to your posts initially. You can sense a change in some posters who were regulars.

Yes I’ve gone down Lookout to 99% 😂😂😂😂. Only joking my friend 👍. If NGB keeps posting I might slide down a bit more 🙈🙈

[lookout]

Yes I’ve gone down Lookout to 99% 😂😂😂😂. Only joking my friend 👍. If NGB keeps posting I might slide down a bit more 🙈🙈

I'm sure you will RJ. Take it from me.

[JackieD]

Why the change?  I am genuinely interested.

I thought that might be a wind up when I saw it this morning

[guest2181]

Why the change?  I am genuinely interested.

Not really changed in terms guilt, just soundness of conviction, mostly concerning JM's evidence and how it was obtained.

[ngb1066]

Not really changed in terms guilt, just soundness of conviction, mostly concerning JM's evidence and how it was obtained.

Thanks Hartley.

[Roch]

Not really changed in terms guilt, just soundness of conviction, mostly concerning JM's evidence and how it was obtained.

I'm afraid this doesn't move you on my scale. As it is a scale of guilt.  I'm not aware of any recent developments regarding JM's evidence or how it was obtained. I did see something in The Guardian a few years back.

[Roch]

There are quite a few forum members, whose posting period didn't really coincide much with mine - or- I may not have had much involvement with them. 

Can anyone please help me understand.. at roughly what percentage of guilt, the following members perceived JB?

NotSure

OnceSaid

Sherlock

Any more help available with the first two?

[guest2181]

I'm afraid this doesn't move you on my scale. As it is a scale of guilt.  I'm not aware of any recent developments regarding JM's evidence or how it was obtained. I did see something in The Guardian a few years back.

Okay.

[Roch]

Here's one for you all. Of the current posters Robittybob1 and Smythe, which one is the more neutral in their stance? Is it a case that you couldn't get a cigarette paper between their neutrality.. Or is one less neutral than the other?

[lookout]

Smythe, to my mind is more neutral between the two of them.

[Roch]

Smythe, to my mind is more neutral between the two of them.

Thank you for your view. I'm not sure what those members themselves think, however I would be tempted to place them in the 50%-60% guilt band. I don't have a dead on 50% option, so the only other option for neutrality would be 40%-50%.  Not sure where I'm supposed to put QC either.

[Robittybob1]

Here's one for you all. Of the current posters Robittybob1 and Smythe, which one is the more neutral in their stance? Is it a case that you couldn't get a cigarette paper between their neutrality.. Or is one less neutral than the other?

I think someone else did it.  Not JB or SC but a third party tidied up after SC started the massacre.

[David1819]

I think someone else did it.  Not JB or SC but a third party tidied up after SC started the massacre.

lol

[Roch]

lol

They're entitled to their opinion. I'd be interested to read more.