it was i who removed the post from jailman, hes a newbie and that was his first post...what does that tell us ? he was blatantly rude by calling the other poster a c@@k. newbies should read the disclaimer before posting, that way their posts wouldnt get removed. I explianed to ngb yesterday that i dont want to remove posts, and that post was the first time that i have.
but as is clearly stated in the disclaimer, if you start being rude towards other posters the post will be removed. simple 
dont blame the mods balme the posters.
Might I suggest a fairer approach would be to determine whether there was any truth to the post before removing it? That way we could avoid any accusations of undue censorship.
In the case of the claims made in my earlier post, we could perhaps set up a poll to determine whether smiffy is indeed a massive cock. I suggest a 7 day voting period should be sufficient to settle the matter. The poll thread could also serve as a discussion forum, to give the issue a much-needed airing.
Alternatively we could make a judgment based on the number of applauds and smites smiffy has against his account, since this would already seem to give some insight into the esteem in which he is held amongst his peers, and is thus a reasonably accurate indicator of the magnitude of his phallic nature.
I welcome all comments on this suggestion and hope we can move forward in a constructive fashion.
