Did JM ever really love Jeremy Bamber?

[hartley]

Yes.

Not sure about JM though.

so hartley the family then look at this board, have they ever indicated to you that what is wrote on here is in their opinion libellous?

No they have not.

EDIT: Although they may have to someone else, I don't know.

[andrea]

Yes.

Not sure about JM though.

so hartley the family then look at this board, have they ever indicated to you that what is wrote on here is in their opinion libellous?

No they have not.

EDIT: Although they may have to someone else, I don't know.

thanks hartley, in your opinion would they take legal action against anyone on this board, if they felt they were being libelled?    if your not sure hartley thats fine.

[hartley]

Yes.

Not sure about JM though.

so hartley the family then look at this board, have they ever indicated to you that what is wrote on here is in their opinion libellous?

No they have not.

EDIT: Although they may have to someone else, I don't know.

thanks hartley, in your opinion would they take legal action against anyone on this board, if they felt they were being libelled?    if your not sure hartley thats fine.

I don't know, I'm not really in a position to offer an opinion.

[andrea]

can you tell us which members look at the forum hartley? are they "main players" so to speak ?

[Roch]

Rochford
As plain as anything (and backed up by people who have sent me pm s)  it was to get rid of Ngb because of his experience and to stop us saying anything about the relatives and JM

I am clear on that

Ngb and I have become friends over the last few months and if I had said anything that would have got me in trouble legally he would have warned me

He hasnt

Do I trust him
Yes

Do I trust some of the other posters on here who are saying he doesnt know what he is talking about

No I dont

If they were right me and shona would be looking at 20 years inside for what we have said about Mugford

I trust him also.  The issue of libel and defamation went right back to Kaldin, Mb1, TBM who questioned this either in the disclaimer or early threads I believe.  I've not seen the pm's you are referring to so I cant comment on them.  But I would like to see ngb return and argue the case for Jeremy Bamber, as he has previously done with great skill and tact.  If he returns, then any alleged plan to get rid of him hasn't worked has it?

[hartley]

can you tell us which members look at the forum hartley? are they "main players" so to speak ?

Unfortunately I'll have to direct you towards Vic.

I'm not happy divulging that information, Vic may be.

[andrea]

ah well....i tried

[vidvic]

ah well....i tried

I'm worried there would be a witchhunt to work out their identities.

[andrea]

ah well....i tried

I'm worried there would be a witchhunt to work out their identities.

have they actually joined the forum vic ?

[vidvic]

ah well....i tried

I'm worried there would be a witchhunt to work out their identities.

I don't know, honestly. But some of them do read the stuff regularly.





have they actually joined the forum vic ?

[andrea]

are the ones that read main players vic ?

[vidvic]

are the ones that read main players vic ?

Yes. Ann comes on here from time to time.

[andrea]

so she just looks and hasnt registered?

[vidvic]

I don't know, honestly. But some of them do read the stuff regularly.

[grahameb]

To be fair, he did state that he'd been involved in many defamation cases.

This is getting a tad boring though, he could claim to be the prime minister for all I care, as long as he is civil to others, which for the most part he has been as far as I can see.

It may be becoming a tad boring to you Hartley. But to the one who has this near libellous accusations levelled at him constantly they are becoming more and more distressing and I intend to put a stop to it one way or another.

I think it's a tad boring to everyone.

Finish it then, lock the thread, have a word with the mods and the people involved, take it to PM's rather than on the public boards.

Issue warning or bans, temporary or permanent, delete posts, etc, etc.

It really shouldn't be this difficult.

Hartley I am the kind of person that likes to think the best in people to be adult enough to control their own childish behaviour. There are 7 moderators in this forum. But it seems that I am the only one who has gut enough to admit there is a serious problem with a few posters which by some strange fluke always seem to be in the anti bamber camp who are also it seems to me to be backed up by the anti bamber moderators. I don't know about you, but to me there seems to be some kind of unequal judgement on the part of those particular moderator. The others it seems to me are afraid to take a stand against it? I'm sorry, but this has to be said publically whether folk like it or not.

You are not alone in taking this view, Grahame, I too am concerned about this issue and I know that I am only mod who shares your view.

Do you mean that only you and I have the insight to see what is going on here? Well that is a surprise and a disappointment.