Did JM ever really love Jeremy Bamber?

[Jackiepreece]

Hartley you might think you are clever but I will stay on the side of all those people that have written testimonials and you stay on the side of Ann eaton, Vidvic, Jerry, Gerald and jailbird and Paulg if that makes you happy and I count Ngb as a friend and an amazing person and him and Jeremy are working very well together

[Jackiepreece]

Paulg what exactly is serious

[hartley]

Hartley you might think you are clever but I will stay on the side of all those people that have written testimonials and you stay on the side of Ann eaton, Vidvic, Jerry, Gerald and jailbird and Paulg if that makes you happy and I count Ngb as a friend and an amazing person and him and Jeremy are working very well together

My opinions are my own. I'm not on anybodies side.

[Roch]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

[Jackiepreece]

Paulg I never want Ngb s name mentioned again he's gone I am glad he's left and the legal stuff on the forum can be left to you

I am absolutely disgusted

[paulg]

Well that just shows someone's intelligence and the very reason I have put a stop to Ngb ever posting on this forum again.  For your information Paul a number of members of this forum know who Ngb is and they know exactly his background and his experience but I am glad you have got your legal beagle mates to take Ngb s place on the forum

Maybe a lot of people are too stupid to realise but this is a nice set up with Paul Vidvic Hartley Gerry and Jerry to stop people saying anything against Mugford and the relatives

What a great forum this is but I can take away something good from Pauls profound conclusions Ngb has so much more time working on JB s case and just incase your interested Ngb is very connected to people who make the highest decisions

I suggest Jackie that you ask Mike T for his take on things, because Gerald just might have saved a lot of people from law suits.

The facts are Jackie, that if you call JM an evil lying bitch, it is down to you to prove this in a court of law, she would not have to say a single word, and her lawyers would have to say very little as well.

NGB is welcome to come in here and show us in English law any different, but i don't think he can...if he does, i'll gladly fall on my sword, apologise, and melt away.

[Jackiepreece]

Rochy I don't want Ngb mentioned again it's bad enough what he has had to put up with over the weeks and a lot of it was probably because he defended me

Rocky don't get in any arguments it's just not worth it nobody here is worth it

[paulg]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

Are you serious Rochy, NGB gives mis-information about defamatory laws, is questioned on it, claims to represent companies on the laws, and suspects its John out to goad him. Do me a favour, he would have known he was wrong.

Gerald may have seemed to be John to the casual observer, but it shouldn't have been the case with NGB.

[Roch]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

Are you serious Rochy, NGB gives mis-information about defamatory laws, is questioned on it, claims to represent companies on the laws, and suspects its John out to goad him. Do me a favour, he would have known he was wrong.

Gerald may have seemed to be John to the casual observer, but it shouldn't have been the case with NGB.

I wasn't kidding and I don't doubt for a moment his absolute genuine credentials.  He posted many times on this forum, often very quickly in response to many different legal queries.  The forum will be considerably lesser for his withdrawal.  But that's his choice I suppose.  P.S. It was me who suggested to him that Gerald was John.  In light of that being incorrect, I do apologise.  Since Gerald had only posted a few times and used a sarcastic tone, plus it's quite feasible for John to have some knowledge of such legal matters, given who he allegedly is, I think the thought of further cretinous baiting by 'John' was off-putting for him.

[paulg]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

Are you serious Rochy, NGB gives mis-information about defamatory laws, is questioned on it, claims to represent companies on the laws, and suspects its John out to goad him. Do me a favour, he would have known he was wrong.

Gerald may have seemed to be John to the casual observer, but it shouldn't have been the case with NGB.

I wasn't kidding and I don't doubt for a moment his absolute genuine credentials.  He posted many times on this forum, often very quickly in response to many different legal queries.  The forum will be considerably lesser for his withdrawal.  But that's his choice I suppose.  P.S. It was me who suggested to him that Gerald was John.  In light of that being incorrect, I do apologise.  Since Gerald had only posted a few times and used a sarcastic tone, plus it's quite feasible for John to have some knowledge of such legal matters, given who he allegedly is, I think the thought of further cretinous baiting by 'John' was off-putting for him.

But he shouldn't withdraw though should he Rochy? Just a "i got it wrong, sorry" is enough.

[chochokeira]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

Are you serious Rochy, NGB gives mis-information about defamatory laws, is questioned on it, claims to represent companies on the laws, and suspects its John out to goad him. Do me a favour, he would have known he was wrong.

Gerald may have seemed to be John to the casual observer, but it shouldn't have been the case with NGB.

I wasn't kidding and I don't doubt for a moment his absolute genuine credentials.  He posted many times on this forum, often very quickly in response to many different legal queries.  The forum will be considerably lesser for his withdrawal.  But that's his choice I suppose.  P.S. It was me who suggested to him that Gerald was John.  In light of that being incorrect, I do apologise.  Since Gerald had only posted a few times and used a sarcastic tone, plus it's quite feasible for John to have some knowledge of such legal matters, given who he allegedly is, I think the thought of further cretinous baiting by 'John' was off-putting for him.

Hi Rocky, I thought he was John too because he used the tactics, the same line of attack, the same manner, the same accusation that ngb was lying about his profession when that is not the case.

[paulg]

paulg I don't think he 'hid behind' anything.  There was a genuine suspicion that Gerald was another John incarnation.  What should be taken in to account therefore, is not only Gerald's opening salvo but also the previous war of attrition waged by John against ngb. It should be seen in that context.

Are you serious Rochy, NGB gives mis-information about defamatory laws, is questioned on it, claims to represent companies on the laws, and suspects its John out to goad him. Do me a favour, he would have known he was wrong.

Gerald may have seemed to be John to the casual observer, but it shouldn't have been the case with NGB.

I wasn't kidding and I don't doubt for a moment his absolute genuine credentials.  He posted many times on this forum, often very quickly in response to many different legal queries.  The forum will be considerably lesser for his withdrawal.  But that's his choice I suppose.  P.S. It was me who suggested to him that Gerald was John.  In light of that being incorrect, I do apologise.  Since Gerald had only posted a few times and used a sarcastic tone, plus it's quite feasible for John to have some knowledge of such legal matters, given who he allegedly is, I think the thought of further cretinous baiting by 'John' was off-putting for him.

Hi Rocky, I thought he was John too because he used the tactics, the same line of attack, the same manner, the same accusation that ngb was lying about his profession when that is not the case.

Well NGB should come on here and correct his statements then.

[Jackiepreece]

You are now absolutely taking the piss now Paul you are not trying to insinuate Ngb is wrong

You are kidding yes

Paul thanks for bringing the forum to it's knees

A big clap for you though getting rid of a barrister and gun expert all in one day
What good work for the anti Bamber camp

It does not take a genius to see Gerald got everything off the Internet

I will put it to you Paul why don't you have a thousand pound bet with Ngb who has got the best credentials

Think before you make ridiculous statements about genuine people

Put up or shut up

[Roch]

paulg / choch...Well ideally I would have preferred for ngb to hang around and challenge / post as before, rather than pack in.  Any grievance he has is his grievance.  I cant speak for him.  I can only offer an opinion of the context surrounding what happened, as I perceived it to be.   

I don't see any prosecution linked witnesses scrambling to undergo polygraphs and I dont think we'll see any dragging posters through the courts... but I appreciate your concern on the defamation / libel issue paulg, in relation to the forum.

[chochokeira]

paulg / choch...Well ideally I would have preferred for ngb to hang around and challenge / post as before, rather than pack in.  Any grievance he has is his grievance.  I cant speak for him.  I can only offer an opinion of the context surrounding what happened, as I perceived it to be.   

I don't see any prosecution linked witnesses scrambling to undergo polygraphs and I dont think we'll see any dragging posters through the courts... but I appreciate your concern on the defamation / libel issue paulg, in relation to the forum.

Well said, Rocky, I agree with you.