The thing is they are claiming they have found evidence that 5 senior officers knew about this , but would they have dared to write this down anywhere ? It doe not seem feasible does it ?
There exists a further five Crime reference numbers, which are totally different to the disclosed two that we know of (relating to the original investigation, 7th August 1985 until 7th September 1985 - SC/688/85), and then afterwards when Jeremy was arrested, bailed, and subsequently rearrested (7th September 1985, onwards - SC/786/85), the documentary evidence contained in each of these two crime reference files, have become partly integrated into both files, in order to prosecute Jeremy Bambers for the collective five murders!
Different documentary evidence was gathered into and became an integral part of these other crime reference files, related in connection with the individual shootings of all five victims. Of particular interest, is the unique crime reference file, put together regarding the circumstances surrounding the shooting incidents of Sheila Caffell after the firearm officers entered the farmhouse. The truth surrounding how, where and when Sheila was shot is contained in her personal crime reference file, held at Southend-on-Sea police station (Special Branch, Department)...
Just so that you and others are made aware, the evidence gathered in the two crime reference files (SC/688/85, and SC/786/85), do not tally entirely. In the first of these two files (SC/688/85), is contained all the evidence regarding the 'informatives' carried out by senior officers, and the role played by headquarters SOCO, in the restaging of the various crime scenes inside the farmhouse, and the fact that the first team of SOCO's recovered, and redistributed spent cartridge cases in accordance with how the police had rearranged the position of the three adult victims bodies after Sheila was accidentally shot on the second occasion once her body had been removed from on top of her parents bed, and placed onto the bedroom floor!
Jeremy Bamber implored me to believe that he did not harm his sister, he needed her to be alive so that she would take the wrap for the other deaths, having reassured her that he would make sure that she would get half of their parents inheritance...
In my opinion, Jeremy made an error, in going along with the original Essex police narrative (crime reference file, SC/688/85), that Sheila killed the others, and then took her own life! This was despite the fact that he knew that Sheila was still very much alive by the time (3.36am) he spoke to PC West in the control room at Chelmsford police station..
The relatives had their suspicion that something was just not right, with the narrative that Sheila had shot dead her young boys, as well as both her adoptive parents and then before the police gained entry into the farmhouse at just after 7.30am, that she had taken her own life on the parents bedroom floor!
The relatives were right in assuming that Sheila had not physically shot any of the other four victims!
The relatives were spot on in their belief that Sheila could not have shot herself twice in the throat - because she hadn't and she didn't. The problem insofar as the circumstances surrounding the death of Sheila are / were concerned, is that they mistook the actions of the police, as though Jeremy was responsible for having done that which police were responsible for having done to Sheila, whether it had been the right thing to do or not, in the overall circumstances of Sheila's death...
