Author Topic: PEN PAL FROM HELL Jeremy Bamber sent me hundreds of twisted letters from prison  (Read 30601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sami

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4490
Nobody knows who it was or if it even happened.
cant the ct get wilkes to remove it

Offline ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
I might have to repost his racist posts he can still be charged because of the serious content of them

You are quite right.  He disappeared for a long time when he was exposed.  Prosecution was a serious risk he faced.




Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Not really. The version of events she puts near the end of the book of how she thinks Jeremy could have carried out the murders, is not compatible with the known facts and even contradicts her own research.

The prerogative word being....COULD     I have CAL's book, but you are doing a brilliant job in promoting it to those who haven't read it.

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
     Could any believers clarify which CAL claims or claims made on her behalf they actually do still believe. It seems to be a moving target at the moment.
     Are we now agreed that CAL never said twisted? If so, are the descriptions of "friendly bulletins" an accurate view of CAL's thoughts as summed up in her 2015 interview with the Yorkshire Post?
     Regardless of the position on twisted v friendly or a mixture of the two possibly. Which of CAL's claims is now the definitive position of the actual amount of these twisted letters/friendly bulletins? Is it a pile, dozens or hundreds?
    There are nine possible positions to take from the above options, enough for believers to have their own bespoke opinion.
    How about a pile of twisted letters?
    Perhaps you believe that there are hundreds made up of twisted/friendly bulletins?
    Perhaps your favoured options are dozens of friendly bulletins?
    Which is the current position?

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
As its already been pointed out by Gringo. She has claimed a few years ago that she received "dozens" of "friendly" letters from him. Now its "hundreds" of twisted letters. They cannot both be true.

Not that this is really a big deal anyway.

You said it David!!

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
You said it David!!
   Shows CAL to be unreliable and not a credible source. No consistency, no  credibility.

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
   Shows CAL to be unreliable and not a credible source. No consistency, no  credibility.

In your opinion!

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Spot on. XD

Ditto

Another complete waste of money

I would like to see a book written from a legal point of view

There is plenty to pull apart there and a whole new viewpoint
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
The prerogative word being....COULD     I have CAL's book, but you are doing a brilliant job in promoting it to those who haven't read it.


Really. That’s in your opinion. The book can’t be very good as she is obviously quite happy to have lies broadcast to sell it

Very desperate comes to mind.

I guarantee she won’t be able to produce one twisted letter
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
The prerogative word being....COULD     I have CAL's book, but you are doing a brilliant job in promoting it to those who haven't read it.

I also have the book. If a scenario is not compatible with the physical evidence, it COULDN'T and therefore didn't happen period.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2020, 10:19:PM by David1819 »

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
   Shows CAL to be unreliable and not a credible source. No consistency, no  credibility.

Absolutely spot on
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13786
Ditto

Another complete waste of money

I would like to see a book written from a legal point of view

There is plenty to pull apart there and a whole new viewpoint

I have considered doing this, but I suck at writing.  :(

Offline Romeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 319
Ditto

Another complete waste of money

I would like to see a book written from a legal point of view

There is plenty to pull apart there and a whole new viewpoint

I agree regarding some books JackieD, I've got Scott Lomax book 'Evil, Almost Beyond Belief'....Another waste of money. 

Offline gringo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
In your opinion!
   By any objective view she is unreliable. Contradictory claims.
    Do you think she is a reliable source?

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Journalist
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000