Author Topic: Guardian re Boyce findings  (Read 20385 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #60 on: December 10, 2019, 07:53:PM »


Perhaps you can give some insight into how Sheila's blood came to be in two silencers/moderators?

Well, they’re going to say it was RB’s but you’d be left with the problem of there being 2! Who is going to doctor 2 silencers? It doesn’t make any sense.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #61 on: December 10, 2019, 07:54:PM »
Well, they’re going to say it was RB’s but you’d be left with the problem of there being 2! Who is going to doctor 2 silencers? It doesn’t make any sense.





Who's talking about doctoring ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #62 on: December 10, 2019, 07:57:PM »




Who's talking about doctoring ?



So perhaps you can shed some light on how you think Sheila's blood was found in two silencers/moderators?

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #63 on: December 10, 2019, 08:02:PM »


So perhaps you can shed some light on how you think Sheila's blood was found in two silencers/moderators?

Well if there is blood specifically from Sheila inside two different sound moderators, the only light I can shed is that it is highly unlikely the blood got there from her being killed by Jeremy Bamber, for two reasons.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 08:03:PM by Roch »

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21087
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #64 on: December 10, 2019, 08:09:PM »
These are all allegations. I seem to recall Andrew Hunter discussing this subject. The incriminating silencer was given three different labels over its life history. There was a reference to a police motor cycle outrider handing back two silencers to the relatives pot-conviction. Another reference claimed a police officer was using one silencer as a paperweight in the office before it was sent to the laboratory for testing.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 08:10:PM by Steve_uk »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #65 on: December 10, 2019, 08:14:PM »
Well if there is blood specifically from Sheila inside two different sound moderators, the only light I can shed is that it is highly unlikely the blood got there from her being killed by Jeremy Bamber, for two reasons.


I don't think it's enough to imply she was killed by a.n.other, and it's asking rather too much to ask anyone to believe that she committed suicide using two silencers/moderators. However, it doesn't suspend belief to take on board that IF Jeremy had used a silencer/moderator, and pressed it against her flesh, that her blood might be in it......................but that only accounts for one.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #66 on: December 10, 2019, 08:24:PM »
Well if there'd been an elongated deep gash down the side of one silencer it's pretty obvious that if any attempt was made to fit it to the rifle it would be rendered unsuitable so another in its place would have been attempted-------hence the blood on them, though not necessarily all from the same person, in other words contaminated as we've heard mixtures of blood was in one of them .

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17579
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #67 on: December 10, 2019, 08:29:PM »

I don't think it's enough to imply she was killed by a.n.other, and it's asking rather too much to ask anyone to believe that she committed suicide using two silencers/moderators. However, it doesn't suspend belief to take on board that IF Jeremy had used a silencer/moderator, and pressed it against her flesh, that her blood might be in it......................but that only accounts for one.

If it were really true that blood specifically from Sheila was in two separate sound moderators, both of which were in police custody, then that could only point towards skullduggery on the part of police or associated others. Jeremy Bamber can't have swapped silencers in between shots. Not only is this not the prosecution case; it is also not consistent with the nature of both wounds (I think).
« Last Edit: December 10, 2019, 08:29:PM by Roch »

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #68 on: December 10, 2019, 08:40:PM »
I remember there was some kind of report which indicated that David Boutflour actually found the silencer in September, but I put that down to a typo. I'll see if I can find it.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #69 on: December 10, 2019, 08:42:PM »
If it were really true that blood specifically from Sheila was in two separate sound moderators, both of which were in police custody, then that could only point towards skullduggery on the part of police or associated others. Jeremy Bamber can't have swapped silencers in between shots. Not only is this not the prosecution case; it is also not consistent with the nature of both wounds (I think).


So can you expand on that. For instance unless it was decided, at ground level, when there was plenty of Sheila's blood available, to frame Jeremy -that would have been on the day they went in?- where did they get the blood from?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #70 on: December 10, 2019, 08:44:PM »

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #71 on: December 10, 2019, 08:50:PM »
Oakey made a statement that he had been to Ann Eaton's house in September to pick up certain articles, but these did not include a silencer.

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,625.msg14058.html#msg14058

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #72 on: December 10, 2019, 09:34:PM »
BTW it was Boyce himself who'd said that it was Sheila's blood on both silencers--------or RWB's.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33771
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #73 on: December 10, 2019, 09:39:PM »
BTW it was Boyce himself who'd said that it was Sheila's blood on both silencers--------or RWB's.



Actually, he used the word "......could......" which is rather different from ".....did....."

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Guardian re Boyce findings
« Reply #74 on: December 10, 2019, 09:43:PM »


Actually, he used the word "......could......" which is rather different from ".....did....."




He " Believes both silencers contain blood from either JB's sister or RWB ".