Author Topic: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985  (Read 9395 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #45 on: November 16, 2019, 05:25:PM »
Unless he thought of her as an accomplice or accessory, in which case he wouldn't think she might go to the police and drop herself in it.
she was no accessory kaldin. And it Jeremy if guilty would have known that to well. And I think Julie did too. Bamber would know he would have to cater to Julie's every whim and beckon call if the police had always accepted the initial story. He would have been on knife edge, you would expected him to be at her side constantly, taking close interest. When in reality it appears the exact opposite took place
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #46 on: November 16, 2019, 05:26:PM »
she was no accessory kaldin. And it Jeremy if guilty would have known that to well. And I think Julie did too. Bamber would know he would have to cater to Julie's every whim and beckon call if the police had always accepted the initial story. He would have been on knife edge, you would expected him to be at her side constantly, taking close interest. When in reality it appears the exact opposite took place

You are aware of the note he sent her after his arrest?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #47 on: November 16, 2019, 05:27:PM »
There was evidence against Jeremy in the form of the silencer. Did Julie know about that before she went to the police?

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #48 on: November 16, 2019, 05:27:PM »
There was evidence against Jeremy in the form of the silencer. Did Julie know about that before she went to the police?

No.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44395
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #49 on: November 16, 2019, 05:28:PM »
There was evidence against Jeremy in the form of the silencer. Did Julie know about that before she went to the police?

There is a mountain of evidence againsr Bamber.

All Bamber told her was he was watertight & it was an open & shut case.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #50 on: November 16, 2019, 05:30:PM »
she was no accessory kaldin. And it Jeremy if guilty would have known that to well. And I think Julie did too. Bamber would know he would have to cater to Julie's every whim and beckon call if the police had always accepted the initial story. He would have been on knife edge, you would expected him to be at her side constantly, taking close interest. When in reality it appears the exact opposite took place

I'm not saying she was an accessory, but Jeremy might have thought of her that way. According to her, he had often spoken about killing his family, and she did nothing to dissuade him, so he might have interpreted that as her going along with it. She covered up for him afterwards, and lied by omission in her first statement. She could have been charged with assisting an offender at least, so he might have thought he was safe even if he dumped her.


Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #51 on: November 16, 2019, 05:30:PM »
She wasn't alone though was she ? She was drip-fed by S.Jones telling her what he wanted her to know but not necessarily what she'd wanted to do. It was the promise of the pot of gold at the end of it that clinched the deal between EP and herself.

What do you suppose would have happened had there been no money ?

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #52 on: November 16, 2019, 05:32:PM »
There is a mountain of evidence againsr Bamber.

All Bamber told her was he was watertight & it was an open & shut case.

I'm referring to this part of your own post:

Quote
Too many problems in Julie trying to frame an innocent man -


There was no evidence against Bamber. He was innocent.

There was evidence though. The question is - did Julie know about it?

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #53 on: November 16, 2019, 05:33:PM »
You are aware of the note he sent her after his arrest?
the " love you stinker" one
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #54 on: November 16, 2019, 05:38:PM »
There is a mountain of evidence againsr Bamber.

All Bamber told her was he was watertight & it was an open & shut case.
actually it equates to a silencer and a jilted girlfriend by the way I'm not pro Jeremy Bamber innocence
« Last Edit: November 16, 2019, 05:39:PM by ilovebooze »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #55 on: November 16, 2019, 05:39:PM »
the " love you stinker" one

Yes, your ex girlfriend has just got you arrested for the murder of your recently dead family; would you send this note?

" Hi Darling, Hope this gets to you from Stalag 13. Thinking about you. Sorry we're splitting up. I love you Stinker"
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #56 on: November 16, 2019, 05:40:PM »
Yes, your ex girlfriend has just got you arrested for the murder of your recently dead family; would you send this note?

" Hi Darling, Hope this gets to you from Stalag 13. Thinking about you. Sorry we're splitting up. I love you Stinker"

Yes, if he thought she might retract her statement.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #57 on: November 16, 2019, 05:43:PM »
Yes, your ex girlfriend has just got you arrested for the murder of your recently dead family; would you send this note?

" Hi Darling, Hope this gets to you from Stalag 13. Thinking about you. Sorry we're splitting up. I love you Stinker"
the letter reeks of sarcasm from Bamber. You'd be a fool to think otherwise
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #58 on: November 16, 2019, 05:46:PM »
the letter reeks of sarcasm from Bamber. You'd be a fool to think otherwise

I can read the sarcasm - so why send such a letter? It's going to make her worse, sounds like he's mocking her and rubbing it in that they split up. Last thing on my mind would be to get one over on her if I were facing those charges.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Julie Mugford's Full Typed Statement 08/09/1985
« Reply #59 on: November 16, 2019, 05:50:PM »
I can read the sarcasm - so why send such a letter? It's going to make her worse, sounds like he's mocking her and rubbing it in that they split up. Last thing on my mind would be to get one over on her if I were facing those charges.


"Sorry we're splitting up"? Surely, as a couple, they'd already split up? It sounds as if he's making a joke of the whole thing. Did she really refer to him as "Stinker" or, was it what he was calling her?