Author Topic: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.  (Read 39590 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #150 on: November 12, 2019, 08:20:PM »

You haven't answered my question. In fact, I don't think you've answered ANY questions. You just move goal-posts. I don't believe you have interest in anything here other than trolling.
you are totally wrong. But I'm willing to answer your question what is it?
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #151 on: November 12, 2019, 08:22:PM »
Steve, JB had Valium so I doubt he'd have been prescribed sleeping pills in addition. There were probably hundreds of sleeping pills at WHF before June's medication was removed.


Why would Jeremy have needed to take Valium prior to the murders? Whilst I'm not sure about the "probably hundreds of sleeping pills at WHF........." there would have been some but I can't see June leaving them laying around, and Jeremy hadn't lived at WHF for several years so it's unlikely he'd have gone hunting for them, besides which, June would probably have missed them.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #152 on: November 12, 2019, 08:23:PM »

I'm not sure that Jeremy thought it was entirely wrong. He thought the twins were a mill-stone around Colin's neck and his parents were old -I think there may have been something about it being a kindness? Oh, and he said his mother was a religious maniac.
interesting... Why would Jeremy Bamber be stupid enough to tell Julie mugford of what he intended to do??
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #153 on: November 12, 2019, 08:24:PM »

Why would Jeremy have needed to take Valium prior to the murders? Whilst I'm not sure about the "probably hundreds of sleeping pills at WHF........." there would have been some but I can't see June leaving them laying around, and Jeremy hadn't lived at WHF for several years so it's unlikely he'd have gone hunting for them, besides which, June would probably have missed them.




I didn't say he took Valium prior to the murders  ::)

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #154 on: November 12, 2019, 08:26:PM »
What's the relevance of someone taking valium...
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #155 on: November 12, 2019, 08:26:PM »

You haven't answered my question. In fact, I don't think you've answered ANY questions. You just move goal-posts. I don't believe you have interest in anything here other than trolling.
I'll reserve judgement for the moment but ilovebooze please direct your questions to the members as a whole and not to one particular individual.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #156 on: November 12, 2019, 08:30:PM »
Steve, JB had Valium so I doubt he'd have been prescribed sleeping pills in addition. There were probably hundreds of sleeping pills at WHF before June's medication was removed.


Lookout, this is what you said. "He had Valium so I doubt he'd have been prescribed sleeping pills in addition" He wasn't taking Valium at the time he wanted sleeping pills to drug his father, ergo, there was nothing to stop him requesting them from his doctor.......................other than if it had worked, the trail would have led back to him.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13152
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #157 on: November 12, 2019, 08:31:PM »
I'll reserve judgement for the moment but ilovebooze please direct your questions to the members as a whole and not to one particular individual.
no problem , you are wrong
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #158 on: November 12, 2019, 08:34:PM »

Lookout, this is what you said. "He had Valium so I doubt he'd have been prescribed sleeping pills in addition" He wasn't taking Valium at the time he wanted sleeping pills to drug his father, ergo, there was nothing to stop him requesting them from his doctor.......................other than if it had worked, the trail would have led back to him.





You know as well as I do that he took the Valium after the tragedy, so therefore there was no need for him to have taken sleeping pills as well. It was JM who needed the sleeping pills.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #159 on: November 12, 2019, 08:39:PM »




You know as well as I do that he took the Valium after the tragedy, so therefore there was no need for him to have taken sleeping pills as well. It was JM who needed the sleeping pills.


Well, of course I know, but it seems that you're implying that he may have had them prior to the murders. He experimented with Julie's sleeping pills before the murders. To the best of my knowledge the two medications are entirely separate.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #160 on: November 12, 2019, 08:43:PM »

Well, of course I know, but it seems that you're implying that he may have had them prior to the murders. He experimented with Julie's sleeping pills before the murders. To the best of my knowledge the two medications are entirely separate.




Experimented on who ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #161 on: November 12, 2019, 08:47:PM »



Experimented on who ?


Experimented with crushing them into Nevill's nightcap, after which it had been his intention to burn the house. He gave up on that plan because of the valuable objets d'art/family heirlooms which would be ruined.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #162 on: November 12, 2019, 08:50:PM »

Experimented with crushing them into Nevill's nightcap, after which it had been his intention to burn the house. He gave up on that plan because of the valuable objets d'art/family heirlooms which would be ruined.




Oh dear, he " gave up on the plan " because it wasn't there in the first place.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #163 on: November 12, 2019, 08:52:PM »



Oh dear, he " gave up on the plan " because it wasn't there in the first place.
If it wasn't there there'd have to be collusion between Michael Deckers and Julie. I'm sorry but this is what I mean by jumping through hoops: every way you turn the circumstantial evidence is damning against Jeremy.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Perjury that went unchallenged at trial.
« Reply #164 on: November 12, 2019, 09:01:PM »
If it wasn't there there'd have to be collusion between Michael Deckers and Julie. I'm sorry but this is what I mean by jumping through hoops: every way you turn the circumstantial evidence is damning against Jeremy.




Circumstantial evidence isn't always enough though in such a case as it was.