Daily Mirror Exclusive: Bambi Killer 19/10/2019

[David1819]

Bonnet's log of the call from West at 3.26 makes it clear that West was reporting a call from Jeremy - IMO.

Bonnet's in his witness statement says the call was West reporting a call from Jeremy. Its not even a matter of opinion.

[mike tesko]

But the new document describes a call to police from Jeremy Bamber timed at "appox 3:37am"

His legal team argue it shows Bamber could not have made the 3:26am call from the farm and returned to his home 3.5 miles away in Goldhanger to make the second call.

it only takes about 7 miutes to drive normally from Jeremy's cottage to the farmhouse. The Jeremy could have been at whf at 3.26am, and back at his cottage in time for him to call the police again at 3.37am..

[Steve_uk]

it only takes about 7 miutes to drive normally from Jeremy's cottage to the farmhouse. The Jeremy could have been at whf at 3.26am, and back at his cottage in time for him to call the police again at 3.37am..

Yes Mike but neighbours at Head Street, Goldhanger said his car never moved all night.

[Kaldin]

it only takes about 7 miutes to drive normally from Jeremy's cottage to the farmhouse. The Jeremy could have been at whf at 3.26am, and back at his cottage in time for him to call the police again at 3.37am..

What are you suggesting? That Jeremy called the police from the farm at 3.26, and then called them again from his own house at 3.37? Why would he do that?

[Kaldin]

Bonnet's in his witness statement says the call was West reporting a call from Jeremy. Its not even a matter of opinion.

It is to some people. 

My view is that there was no call to the police from the farm at any time, and that Jeremy called the police from his own house at around 3.24. However, this doesn't mean that there was no phone call from Nevill to Jeremy at around 3.10. He will never be able to prove that though.

[Steve_uk]

It is to some people. 

My view is that there was no call to the police from the farm at any time, and that Jeremy called the police from his own house at around 3.24. However, this doesn't mean that there was no phone call from Nevill to Jeremy at around 3.10. He will never be able to prove that though.

You're still jumping through hoops to make this scenario fit as there was no blood on the kitchen telephone.

[Kaldin]

You're still jumping through hoops to make this scenario fit as there was no blood on the kitchen telephone.

Well there wouldn't be if Nevill phoned Jeremy before the shooting started.

[Steve_uk]

Well there wouldn't be if Nevill phoned Jeremy before the shooting started.

But it's not in his nature to delegate responsibility. How do you think the family became so wealthy in the first place? You have to look at the context of the whole tragedy: Jeremy toiling away or at least going through the motions of a job he loathed, whilst Sheila was in his view living it up in London in a flat which he had his eye on. The refusal of June to continue writing out personal cheques in his favour to supplement his income, whilst she had just consulted solicitor Basil Cock about providing a quarterly stipend to her daughter, which was in the process of going through.

All of this could be stopped and the will in effect overturned if all died together one morning..

[David1819]

But it's not in his nature to delegate responsibility. How do you think the family became so wealthy in the first place? You have to look at the context of the whole tragedy: Jeremy toiling away or at least going through the motions of a job he loathed, whilst Sheila was in his view living it up in London in a flat which he had his eye on. The refusal of June to continue writing out personal cheques in his favour to supplement his income, whilst she had just consulted solicitor Basil Cock about providing a quarterly stipend to her daughter, which was in the process of going through.

All of this could be stopped and the will in effect overturned if all died together one morning..

Once again Steve makes up a load of fiction about a group of people he has never met nor known. His imaginative theme being the sole basis for his conclusion.

[Kaldin]

But it's not in his nature to delegate responsibility. How do you think the family became so wealthy in the first place? You have to look at the context of the whole tragedy: Jeremy toiling away or at least going through the motions of a job he loathed, whilst Sheila was in his view living it up in London in a flat which he had his eye on. The refusal of June to continue writing out personal cheques in his favour to supplement his income, whilst she had just consulted solicitor Basil Cock about providing a quarterly stipend to her daughter, which was in the process of going through.

All of this could be stopped and the will in effect overturned if all died together one morning..

Yes, but lots of people could say they have family issues, and they don't decide to shoot the whole of them. All that is pure conjecture re motive.

Do you not think it's possible that Nevill could have phoned Jeremy before the violence started?

[Steve_uk]

Once again Steve makes up a load of fiction about a group of people he has never met nor known. His imaginative theme being the sole basis for his conclusion.

You're not averse to a modicum of speculation yourself, such as how Julie arrived at the £2000 bounty figure.

[Steve_uk]

Yes, but lots of people could say they have family issues, and they don't decide to shoot the whole of them. All that is pure conjecture re motive.

Do you not think it's possible that Nevill could have phoned Jeremy before the violence started?

No because what difference would bringing an individual to the scene who was not congenial? It smacks of an attempt to concoct an alibi and as I say was the weakest part of his plan.

[Steve_uk]

I'm sure some of you here will be taking shortly a leaf out of lookout's book..

I've written quite a few letters and sent B/Day and Christmas cards as well. He'll be getting another letter, stamps included, showing my support for keeping his case going and reminding the world that he remains an innocent victim in all this. Positive vibes from me, no need to ask him questions, what for when he's done nothing ?

In my very first letter years ago I told him that I wasn't going to remind him what had happened but I did tell him from the start that I'd known in 1985 that it wasn't he who had committed the crime. My letters just consist of light-hearted news. I've avoided saying how disgusted I am with the justice system.   

[Caroline]

Yes, but lots of people could say they have family issues, and they don't decide to shoot the whole of them. All that is pure conjecture re motive.

Do you not think it's possible that Nevill could have phoned Jeremy before the violence started?

Most don't - some do but Jeremy was more motivated by receiving his inheritance early. I do think something that happened that day was the catalyst though.

Of course it's possible - although highly unlikely he called at all.

[Caroline]

Yes Mike but neighbours at Head Street, Goldhanger said his car never moved all night.

Would they really know?