0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Maybe he couldn't count ? He wouldn't have realised the ( now ) importance of it back then would he ?
Couldn't count? That's the BEST excuse yet! You don't have an answer do you? That's OK though, because there is only one answer - the rifle was already loaded with 5 bullets and he had no intention of shooting rabbits and no, you're right, he didn't realise the importance!
It would have been more to the point if they'd been fingerprinted would it not ? Along with the fingerprints on the Bible and other things, then maybe this forum wouldn't exist.
It probably wouldn't. My guess is that Jeremy's fingers would have been all over everything. Once the murder/suicide with Sheila responsible theory was accepted -and held- what would have been the necessity of taking fingerprints?
There'd have been every necessity to have taken prints of 5 loose bullets as he usually fed bullets to capacity and not one at a time.
What do you mean '5 loose bullets'? There was 30 loose bullets but should have only been 25!
Well where were the 5 ?
What? OK, there are 50 shells in a pack, Jeremy opened a new box and tipped them onto the counter top. He said the magazine was empty (or he wouldn't have needed the new pack as he was in a hurry to shoot rabbits). 25 were used in the killings, so that should leave 25, BUT there were 30 shells found on the counter top not 25. The rifle MUST have had 5 shells already loaded and that's where the extra 5 come from. The story about being in a hurry to shoot rabbits is therefore BS!
Who said he was in any hurry to shoot rabbits ? Not me.
Didn't he say he was? Rabbits tend not to wait...................as proved to be the case.
It's just another detail the Bamberettes will brush off..
